<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Abstract Painting Under Wraps: David Hammons at L&#038;M Arts	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://artcritical.com/2011/02/24/david-hammons/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://artcritical.com/2011/02/24/david-hammons/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2015 04:36:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.5.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Noah Dillon		</title>
		<link>https://artcritical.com/2011/02/24/david-hammons/#comment-324943</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Noah Dillon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2015 04:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://artcritical.com/?p=14291#comment-324943</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://artcritical.com/2011/02/24/david-hammons/#comment-324940&quot;&gt;vicske&lt;/a&gt;.

Did you like the show? I thought it was amazing and now seems like a prescient critique of the four years of bad painting shows that have succeeded it in New York.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://artcritical.com/2011/02/24/david-hammons/#comment-324940">vicske</a>.</p>
<p>Did you like the show? I thought it was amazing and now seems like a prescient critique of the four years of bad painting shows that have succeeded it in New York.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: vicske		</title>
		<link>https://artcritical.com/2011/02/24/david-hammons/#comment-324940</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vicske]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2015 04:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://artcritical.com/?p=14291#comment-324940</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I stumbled upon this review a few years too late and I&#039;m glad because its terrible]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I stumbled upon this review a few years too late and I&#8217;m glad because its terrible</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Justin		</title>
		<link>https://artcritical.com/2011/02/24/david-hammons/#comment-15107</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Justin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://artcritical.com/?p=14291#comment-15107</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What is the meaning of the door?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the meaning of the door?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: joanna thompson		</title>
		<link>https://artcritical.com/2011/02/24/david-hammons/#comment-4918</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[joanna thompson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 13:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://artcritical.com/?p=14291#comment-4918</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[isnt Hammons reiterating what he has always said,why should he play to an art audience,of over educated people who are no fun]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>isnt Hammons reiterating what he has always said,why should he play to an art audience,of over educated people who are no fun</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: sweetman		</title>
		<link>https://artcritical.com/2011/02/24/david-hammons/#comment-3530</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sweetman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 12:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://artcritical.com/?p=14291#comment-3530</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Good commentary after suffering through those of Schjeldahl and Saltz.  Hammonds shows us that good abstract painting is not so easy to dash off. The painted part is a very weak link in his show!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good commentary after suffering through those of Schjeldahl and Saltz.  Hammonds shows us that good abstract painting is not so easy to dash off. The painted part is a very weak link in his show!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
