<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: “Artists who write write for a purpose”	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://artcritical.com/2011/08/31/bookmarked-hofmann/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://artcritical.com/2011/08/31/bookmarked-hofmann/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 05:46:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.5.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Iskra Johnson		</title>
		<link>https://artcritical.com/2011/08/31/bookmarked-hofmann/#comment-12109</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Iskra Johnson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 05:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://artcritical.com/?p=18299#comment-12109</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I love to visit artists and deeply absorb their work in the studio or in performance-space/gallery settings. I do like the comment above about &quot;earnestness and faith:&quot; I&#039;ll happily stand accused of that. I visit other artists and review their work to renew my own faith. It&#039;s the best medicine for doubt that I know of. 

On my blog I post works in progress, thoughts about process, printmaking, photography and mixed media and how the practice of Buddhism informs my work and community. When I see a show that seems to be underexposed I do my best to send out the word and help build an audience. You may visit me at www.iskrafineart.com.

Love &quot;No Hassle at the Castle!&quot;

Iskra]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love to visit artists and deeply absorb their work in the studio or in performance-space/gallery settings. I do like the comment above about &#8220;earnestness and faith:&#8221; I&#8217;ll happily stand accused of that. I visit other artists and review their work to renew my own faith. It&#8217;s the best medicine for doubt that I know of. </p>
<p>On my blog I post works in progress, thoughts about process, printmaking, photography and mixed media and how the practice of Buddhism informs my work and community. When I see a show that seems to be underexposed I do my best to send out the word and help build an audience. You may visit me at <a href="http://www.iskrafineart.com" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.iskrafineart.com</a>.</p>
<p>Love &#8220;No Hassle at the Castle!&#8221;</p>
<p>Iskra</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Melany Terranova		</title>
		<link>https://artcritical.com/2011/08/31/bookmarked-hofmann/#comment-9993</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Melany Terranova]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 18:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://artcritical.com/?p=18299#comment-9993</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[LOVE addition of BOOKMARKED to artcritical.com! Interesting reads.
Thanks.  Melany]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOVE addition of BOOKMARKED to artcritical.com! Interesting reads.<br />
Thanks.  Melany</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Laurie Fendrich		</title>
		<link>https://artcritical.com/2011/08/31/bookmarked-hofmann/#comment-9661</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Laurie Fendrich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 13:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://artcritical.com/?p=18299#comment-9661</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The question of whether artists are somehow superior to critics (or art historians, for that matter) because they tend to write &quot;from the heart&quot; has always interested me.

Here&#039;s how I see it. When artists indulge in overt careerism, it&#039;s always tedious. When they try to explain their own art and its purpose, sometimes it&#039;s good, but often it&#039;s bad. The same holds when they write to promote particular aesthetic ideas (e.g., Juan Gris and Donald Judd), or explore the aesthetic ideas of others. Sometimes it&#039;s good, but often it&#039;s bad. Much depends on the quality of the writing itself. Sharon Butler and Joanne Mattera are both interesting artists and excellent writers, and they have a lot to say about the work they choose to write about. This makes it worthwhile to read their blogs.

Unfortunately, &quot;writing from the heart&quot; is not the sine qua non of good art writing. The sad truth about art, artists and writing about art is that being a good artist, and writing from the heart about art, don&#039;t necessarily lead to good writing. Many terrific artists, writing from the heart, are not good at writing, just as artists writing very well about art are not necessarily good artists.  

Some critics (as well as art historians, while we&#039;re at it) are obsessed with analysis and dissection, but some are not. Dave Hickey&#039;s AIR GUITAR, for example, contains brilliant, moving ruminations on art, with little analysis. Gombrich wrote limpid, inspiring narratives about the history and meaning of art, dipping into analysis only occasionally.

As a painter who writes essays on art for The Chronicle Review, and blogs for Brainstorm, its blog site, I write on many topics other than art. Although I would like to say I &quot;write from the heart,&quot; I think it&#039;s more the case that being a painter drives me to write with a certain disregard for whether or not I will get approval from others. The experience of being an artist teaches artists how to be loners--to take aesthetic stands that aren&#039;t necessarily popular. Whether they write well or not, they almost always have a lot of interesting takes on the world in general.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question of whether artists are somehow superior to critics (or art historians, for that matter) because they tend to write &#8220;from the heart&#8221; has always interested me.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s how I see it. When artists indulge in overt careerism, it&#8217;s always tedious. When they try to explain their own art and its purpose, sometimes it&#8217;s good, but often it&#8217;s bad. The same holds when they write to promote particular aesthetic ideas (e.g., Juan Gris and Donald Judd), or explore the aesthetic ideas of others. Sometimes it&#8217;s good, but often it&#8217;s bad. Much depends on the quality of the writing itself. Sharon Butler and Joanne Mattera are both interesting artists and excellent writers, and they have a lot to say about the work they choose to write about. This makes it worthwhile to read their blogs.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, &#8220;writing from the heart&#8221; is not the sine qua non of good art writing. The sad truth about art, artists and writing about art is that being a good artist, and writing from the heart about art, don&#8217;t necessarily lead to good writing. Many terrific artists, writing from the heart, are not good at writing, just as artists writing very well about art are not necessarily good artists.  </p>
<p>Some critics (as well as art historians, while we&#8217;re at it) are obsessed with analysis and dissection, but some are not. Dave Hickey&#8217;s AIR GUITAR, for example, contains brilliant, moving ruminations on art, with little analysis. Gombrich wrote limpid, inspiring narratives about the history and meaning of art, dipping into analysis only occasionally.</p>
<p>As a painter who writes essays on art for The Chronicle Review, and blogs for Brainstorm, its blog site, I write on many topics other than art. Although I would like to say I &#8220;write from the heart,&#8221; I think it&#8217;s more the case that being a painter drives me to write with a certain disregard for whether or not I will get approval from others. The experience of being an artist teaches artists how to be loners&#8211;to take aesthetic stands that aren&#8217;t necessarily popular. Whether they write well or not, they almost always have a lot of interesting takes on the world in general.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Nancy Natale		</title>
		<link>https://artcritical.com/2011/08/31/bookmarked-hofmann/#comment-9651</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nancy Natale]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 02:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://artcritical.com/?p=18299#comment-9651</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Joanne Mattera&#039;s blog is always insightful, interesting, well written and knowledgeable. Besides all those things, you never lose sight of the real living and breathing artist who is doing the writing. She brings a personal perspective to it all and shares her valuable assessments unstintingly. To top it all off, her sense of humor is killer.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joanne Mattera&#8217;s blog is always insightful, interesting, well written and knowledgeable. Besides all those things, you never lose sight of the real living and breathing artist who is doing the writing. She brings a personal perspective to it all and shares her valuable assessments unstintingly. To top it all off, her sense of humor is killer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
