<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: &#8220;This is how it&#8217;s done&#8221;: David Salle Curates Recent Painting	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://artcritical.com/2016/04/08/katelynn-mills-on-nice-weather/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://artcritical.com/2016/04/08/katelynn-mills-on-nice-weather/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2016 06:46:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.5.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Gerry Bell		</title>
		<link>https://artcritical.com/2016/04/08/katelynn-mills-on-nice-weather/#comment-355223</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gerry Bell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2016 00:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.artcritical.com/?p=56518#comment-355223</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Would have been nice to have at least listed the artists included in the show – some of the names were new to me, like Martha Diamond and Shawn Kuruneru. I found the comparison with The Forever Now overstretched and the contrast between the titles – one firstly a conversational pleasantry, the other a pretentious bid for timelessness – flagged far greater differences in scope and attitude than affinities.

 As Barbara Rose observed, Hoptman’s show would have looked more at home at an art fair or gallery – shorn of museum expectations of an historical perspective and the main difference here is that Salle confines his preferences to an abstract/figurative interface and more gestural or painterly options and looks altogether more knowing for not trying to cram too much in. It’s a shame his show is also is largely New York-centric, but for a gallery show this is only practical and the selection is surely intended to echo Salle’s own circle.  

It’s good to see a ‘critic’ walk the walk and put his talk into action and all the more interesting for being an established painter into the bargain. There wasn’t a lot here that really surprised me, but the selection and hang were undeniably well judged.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would have been nice to have at least listed the artists included in the show – some of the names were new to me, like Martha Diamond and Shawn Kuruneru. I found the comparison with The Forever Now overstretched and the contrast between the titles – one firstly a conversational pleasantry, the other a pretentious bid for timelessness – flagged far greater differences in scope and attitude than affinities.</p>
<p> As Barbara Rose observed, Hoptman’s show would have looked more at home at an art fair or gallery – shorn of museum expectations of an historical perspective and the main difference here is that Salle confines his preferences to an abstract/figurative interface and more gestural or painterly options and looks altogether more knowing for not trying to cram too much in. It’s a shame his show is also is largely New York-centric, but for a gallery show this is only practical and the selection is surely intended to echo Salle’s own circle.  </p>
<p>It’s good to see a ‘critic’ walk the walk and put his talk into action and all the more interesting for being an established painter into the bargain. There wasn’t a lot here that really surprised me, but the selection and hang were undeniably well judged.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
