<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Building Up and Breaking Down: Dennis Hollingsworth at Galerie Richard	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://artcritical.com/2019/03/03/john-mendelsohn-on-dennis-hollingsworth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://artcritical.com/2019/03/03/john-mendelsohn-on-dennis-hollingsworth/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2019 14:54:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.5.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Martin Mugar		</title>
		<link>https://artcritical.com/2019/03/03/john-mendelsohn-on-dennis-hollingsworth/#comment-356632</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin Mugar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2019 11:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.artcritical.com/?p=80371#comment-356632</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The last sentence of this review has the flavor of Heidegger&#039;s notion of &quot;letting be&quot; when the reviewer says&quot;made itself known&quot; as though what appears in the painting is something not willed by the artist (which seems applicable to the other work) but revealed to the attentive viewer who lingers in front of the painting. Also Heidegger&#039;s notions  of appearing and the winding down (getting over)of machination in Western thinking are hinted at here. I would imagine that this is more than a calming of the &quot;derangement&quot; inflicted by the other work but the start of a new way of seeing.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The last sentence of this review has the flavor of Heidegger&#8217;s notion of &#8220;letting be&#8221; when the reviewer says&#8221;made itself known&#8221; as though what appears in the painting is something not willed by the artist (which seems applicable to the other work) but revealed to the attentive viewer who lingers in front of the painting. Also Heidegger&#8217;s notions  of appearing and the winding down (getting over)of machination in Western thinking are hinted at here. I would imagine that this is more than a calming of the &#8220;derangement&#8221; inflicted by the other work but the start of a new way of seeing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
