<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jacquelyn Gallo &#8211; artcritical</title>
	<atom:link href="https://artcritical.com/author/jacquelyn-gallo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://artcritical.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 16:55:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.5.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Step Right Up!  A Conversation with Crispin Hellion Glover</title>
		<link>https://artcritical.com/2011/09/05/glove/</link>
					<comments>https://artcritical.com/2011/09/05/glove/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jacquelyn Gallo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 01:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Film/Music/Performance]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://artcritical.com/?p=18456</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Enfant terrible actor/director screens his movies with slideshows and Q&#38;As at the IFC</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2011/09/05/glove/">Step Right Up!  A Conversation with Crispin Hellion Glover</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>What is it? </em>and <em>It is fine!  EVERYTHING IS FINE</em>, accompanied by live slideshows, Q&amp;A and book signings</p>
<p>September 5-7 at <a href="http://www.ifccenter.com/films/it-is-fine-everything-is-fine/" target="_blank">IFC Center</a>, New York, and subsequent tour</p>
<p><em> </em></p>
<p><em> </em></p>
<figure id="attachment_18457" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-18457" style="width: 384px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/style-shop-copy.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-18457 " title="Anna Stave (as &quot;Girl On Street&quot;) and Steven C. Stewart (as &quot;Paul Baker&quot;) in EVERYTHING IS FINE! Photo: David Brothers" src="https://artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/style-shop-copy.jpg" alt="Anna Stave (as &quot;Girl On Street&quot;) and Steven C. Stewart (as &quot;Paul Baker&quot;) in EVERYTHING IS FINE! Photo: David Brothers" width="384" height="400" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2011/09/style-shop-copy.jpg 480w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2011/09/style-shop-copy-275x286.jpg 275w" sizes="(max-width: 384px) 100vw, 384px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-18457" class="wp-caption-text">Anna Stave (as &quot;Girl On Street&quot;) and Steven C. Stewart (as &quot;Paul Baker&quot;) in EVERYTHING IS FINE! Photo: David Brothers </figcaption></figure>
<p>Actor/Director Crispin Hellion Glover (best known for playing the most eccentric roles in mainstream Hollywood including George “Get your damn hands off her!” McFly in “Back to the Future”, the Thin Man in “Charlie’s Angels”, Grendel in “Beowulf” and the Knave of Hearts in Tim Burton’s “Alice in Wonderland” oh and yes, yes, he’s the guy who almost kicked Letterman in the face&#8230;) steadfastly continues his vaudeville- style tour performing as his most idiosyncratic character&#8230;himself!  On each evening, Glover personally presents one of two feature films (“What is it?” and “It is fine!  EVERYTHING IS FINE.” both considered part of the “It” trilogy though either stand alone just fine on their own) alongside a slide show presentation, critical Q&amp;A and book signing.</p>
<p><em> </em></p>
<p><em>Both films have received a great deal of ancillary attention due to their graphic and confrontational subject matter (including racism, self destruction, sexually aggressive tendencies and fetishistic urges), bold imagery (swastikas, black face, oral and manual sex performed for and by the handicapped and Charles Manson) and choice of cast, a majority being disabled actors with Down’s Syndrome, Cerebral Palsy and amputations. But casting actors with these conditions eased (or at least distracted) some of the tension away in both films and allowed for the seemingly guileless characters to unabashedly talk about the elephant in the room that most corporately supported films would try to avoid.  Since both films are independently funded by Glover, the director had the liberty to react instead of pander to the corporate restraints imposed on modern film and dive into one of our culture’s most “taboo” subject matters. </em></p>
<p><em> </em></p>
<p><em>I caught up with the aberrant auteur to put a few questions regarding his cinematic feat.</em></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>You are such a showman!  I love the vaudevillian aspect of the Glover experience.  Other than the amazingly comfortable chairs, why did you choose a venue like IFC to host your event rather than say, a space at Coney Island or an art gallery/museum? </strong></p>
<p>Thank you! This will be my fourth time showing at the IFC. I have a comfortable association with them. If other venues wish to book me they can do so by contacting <a href="mailto:booking@CrispinGlover.com">booking@CrispinGlover.com</a>. People erroneously believe that I choose venues and then book those venues. Generally venues contact me and then I go to them. I have played in many museums, which I enjoy greatly. It is very important that the venue has a 35 mm projection system as my films are 35 mm prints. I am open to playing in almost any place that has good 35 mm projection.</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Is the film component the main attraction or are all parts integral to each other? </strong></p>
<p>I have been performing two different specific performances alongside the two specific feature films that then have a Q &amp;A that follows each, followed by a book signing.  The live aspect of the shows is not to be underestimated. This is a large part of how I bring audiences in to the theater&#8230; For “Crispin Hellion Glover&#8217;s Big Slide Show” I perform a one hour dramatic narration of eight different books I have made over the years. The books are taken from old books from the 1800&#8217;s that have been changed into different books from what they originally were. They are heavily illustrated with original drawings and reworked images and photographs&#8230;</p>
<p>The fact that I tour with the film helps the distribution element. I consider what I am doing to be following in the steps of vaudeville performers. Vaudeville was the main form of entertainment for most of the history of the US. It has only relatively recently stopped being the main source of entertainment, but that does not mean this live element mixed with other media is no longer viable. In fact it is apparent that it is sorely missed.</p>
<p><strong>In the future, will you ever show one without the other or do they always need to hold hands? </strong></p>
<p>In this economy it seems like touring with the live show and showing the films with a book signing is a very good basic safety net for recouping the monies I have invested in the films.  There are other beneficial aspects of touring with the shows other than monetary elements&#8230;.It is enjoyable to travel and visit places, meet people, perform the shows and have interaction with the audiences and discussions about the films afterwards. The forum after the show is also not to be under-estimated as a very important part of the show for the audience. This also makes me much more personally grateful to the individuals who come to my shows as there is no corporate intermediary. Both Crispin Hellion Glover’s Big Slide Show Part 1 and 2 are now set shows that do not vary. That being said there is an element of my own energy that will play a part on how either show is performed from night to night&#8230; They key is if the structure of the show itself works&#8230; Every once in a while there can be a technical problem that has to be dealt with and the audience actually always enjoys the aspect of “the show must go on!”</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<figure id="attachment_18458" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-18458" style="width: 338px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><strong><a href="https://artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/final-poster.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-18458 " title="PHOTO CREDIT: DAVID BROTHERS" src="https://artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/final-poster.jpg" alt="PHOTO CREDIT: DAVID BROTHERS" width="338" height="500" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2011/09/final-poster.jpg 338w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2011/09/final-poster-202x300.jpg 202w" sizes="(max-width: 338px) 100vw, 338px" /></a></strong><figcaption id="caption-attachment-18458" class="wp-caption-text">PHOTO CREDIT: DAVID BROTHERS</figcaption></figure>
<p><strong>Critics and fans have welcomed you into the upper echelons of creative critical thinkers such as photographer Diane Arbus and filmmaker Werner Herzog &#8211; two names that frequently hover around yours.  At some point, even the most beauteous must feel like the hunched over giant in Arbus’ work (<em>Jewish Giant, taken at Home with His Parents in the Bronx, NY, 1970</em>) trying to assimilate into an oftentimes ill fitting world.  And many can empathize with the comical outsiders who fumble haphazardly in search of transcendence in Herzog’s films.  What facets of your own characters are relatable to the mass?  How important, overall, is it for your characters and/or your work to be understood and identified with by the populace?</strong></p>
<p>I believe humans are a naturally curious species and when it comes to it anything that has questions or that can cause questions is something that humans in general will be attracted to. My interest is to make films that cause questions or thoughts.</p>
<p>I am very careful to make it quite clear that <em>What is it?</em> is not a film about Down’s Syndrome but my psychological reaction to the corporate restraints that have happened in the last 20 to 30 years in film making. Specifically anything that can possibly make an audience uncomfortable is necessarily excised or the film will not be corporately funded or distributed. This is damaging to the culture because it is the very moment when an audience member sits back in their chair looks up at the screen and thinks to their self “Is this right what I am watching? Is this wrong what I am watching? Should I be here? Should the filmmaker have made this? What is it?” -and that is the title of the film. What is it that is taboo in the culture? What does it mean that taboo has been ubiquitously excised in this culture’s media? What does it mean to the culture when it does not properly process taboo in it’s media? It is a bad thing because when questions are not being asked because these kinds of questions are when people are having a truly educational experience. For the culture to not be able to ask questions leads towards a non educational experience and that is what is happening in this culture. This stupefies this culture and that is of course a bad thing. So <em>What is it?</em> is a direct reaction to the contents this culture’s media. I would like people to think for themselves.</p>
<p><strong>You&#8217;ve discussed the benefits of using actors with Down&#8217;s syndrome to play characters in your film.  What are your feelings on genetic testing for Down&#8217;s syndrome and recent aggressive scientific research to predetermine those with genetic &#8220;imperfections&#8221;?</strong></p>
<p>Science and the understanding of how the human body functions and the universe around us is an important thing. It is up to the culture how it implements it’s laws regarding science. I believe one can argue almost any moral standpoint almost equally as well as the other. The sensitivity of this issue is not up to me. I had a great time working with all the actors in <em>What is it?</em> including all the actors with Down’s Syndrome. They are all great people.</p>
<p><strong>You talk about your work as a psychological reaction to corporate media and how it has influenced culture &#8211; your work seems to not only be a humorous reflection of this but also an aggrieved backlash.  How does humor play a part in indignant resistance? </strong></p>
<p>I am glad you know there is humor. Humor definitely helps to sooth information, concepts or thoughts that can be be difficult for some to deal with. When a human laughs they feel a part of something if there is a laugh accompanied with new information or concepts then the person who is laughing about this new concept/information has truly ingested that concept and information.</p>
<p><strong>Has corporate media also altered our instinctive desire? </strong></p>
<p>Corporate funded and distributed media’s goal is to alter the desire of people in order to serve the interests of the corporations that are funding the media.</p>
<p><strong>And a heartfelt side note regarding Steven C. Stewart&#8230;<em> </em></strong></p>
<p>Steven C. Stewart wrote and is the main actor in part two of the trilogy titled <em>It is fine! EVERYTHING IS FINE.</em> Steve had been locked in a nursing home for about ten years when his mother died. He had been born with a severe case of cerebral palsy and he was very difficult to understand. People that were caring for him in the nursing home would derisively call him an “M.R.” short for “Mental Retard”&#8230; When he did get out he wrote his screenplay. Although it is written in the genre of a murder detective thriller, truths of his own existence come through much more clearly than if he had written it as a standard autobiography&#8230;. I read it in 1987 and as soon as I had read it I knew I had to produce the film. Steven C. Stewart died within a month after we finished shooting the film.  One of Steve’s lungs had collapsed because he had started choking on his own saliva and he got pneumonia. I specifically started funding my own films with the money I make from the films I act in.  When Steven C. Stewart’s lung collapsed in the year 2000 this was around the same time that the first Charlie’s Angels film was coming to me. I realized with the money I made from that film I could put straight in to the Steven C. Stewart film. That is exactly what happened&#8230; I am relieved to have gotten this film finally completed because ever since I read the screenplay in 1987 I knew I had to produce the film and also produce it correctly. I would not have felt right about myself if I had not gotten Steve’s film made&#8230;</p>
<p>I am very proud of the film as I am of <em>What is it?</em> I feel <em>It is fine! EVERYTHING IS FINE.</em> will probably be the best film I will have anything to do with in my entire career.</p>
<p>People who are interested in when I will be back should join up on the e mail list at <a href="http://CrispinGlover.com/" target="_blank">CrispinGlover.com</a> as they will be emailed with information as to where I will be where with whatever film I tour with. It is by far the best way to know how to see the films.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2011/09/05/glove/">Step Right Up!  A Conversation with Crispin Hellion Glover</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://artcritical.com/2011/09/05/glove/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>“The Wall of Vagina” at (where else?) The Hole</title>
		<link>https://artcritical.com/2011/07/09/wall-of-vagina/</link>
					<comments>https://artcritical.com/2011/07/09/wall-of-vagina/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jacquelyn Gallo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 19:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Film/Music/Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deitch Projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pfahler| Kembra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Hole]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://artcritical.com/?p=17441</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Performance by The Girls of Karen Black took place at the Bowery's newest gallery on June 27</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2011/07/09/wall-of-vagina/">“The Wall of Vagina” at (where else?) The Hole</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kembra Pfahler and The Girls of Karen Black: <em>The Wall of Vagina</em> at The Hole</p>
<p>Monday, June 27, 2011<br />
312 Bowery, between Bleecker and Houston streets<br />
New York City, 212 466 1100</p>
<figure id="attachment_17442" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-17442" style="width: 550px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Wall_of_Vagina.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-17442 " title="Performance of &quot;The Wall of Vagina&quot; by the Girls of Karen Black, The Hole, New York, Monday, June 27, 2011. Photo by Rosalie Knox" src="https://artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Wall_of_Vagina.jpg" alt="Performance of &quot;The Wall of Vagina&quot; by the Girls of Karen Black, The Hole, New York, Monday, June 27, 2011. Photo by Rosalie Knox" width="550" height="366" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2011/07/Wall_of_Vagina.jpg 550w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2011/07/Wall_of_Vagina-300x199.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 550px) 100vw, 550px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-17442" class="wp-caption-text">Performance of &quot;The Wall of Vagina&quot; by the Girls of Karen Black, The Hole, New York, Monday, June 27, 2011. Photo by Rosalie Knox</figcaption></figure>
<p>Just one day after NYC’s monumental Gay Pride Parade, the flag shed its cloth and lent its colors to an evening of naked horror.  A sizable crowd of sexy misfits gathered Monday night at Bowery’s newest venue, The Hole, for a brief yet remarkable piece, <em>The Wall of Vagina</em>, a rare performance by The Girls of Karen Black (GOKB).</p>
<p>Prior to the highly anticipated performance, the bare breasted GOKB cavorted under bright scrutiny of the gallery’s 7-11-style fluorescent lighting, mingling with guests while painted head to toe in either red, blue or purple and sporting thigh high stiletto boots, a towering red-glittered black bouffant wig and an occasional pair of black undies.  In contrast to the typical NYC “whaddya lookin’ at!” attitude, these stylish shock monsters welcomed the gaze of curious oglers.  One fellow crouched behind a GOKB to take a close up snap of her crack.  After the admirer gained her attention from a light tap on the back, she giggled and nodded in approval at the photo as her vanished lips widened, exposing a mouth full of painted-upon crushed black teeth.  A blend of Alejandro Jodorowsky and John Waters, the scene was a refreshing mix of sex, camp and horror.</p>
<p>Eventually the lights lowered and the sweaty crowd swiftly gathered towards a platform, constructed specially for the performance. Cell phone cams quickly shot up to catch the unique event (I had a partial-view seat between a Nokia and an IPhone) as the ladies strutted through the audience onto the stage.   Photographer, video artist and GOKB member Bijoux Altamirano photographed from below as five ladies (the highest pileup to date) climbed one by one facedown, spread eagle on top of each other, exposing their colored cheeks and shaven cherryless pits to the audience, last one on being the much adored Kembra Pfahler (lead singer of The Voluptuous Horror of Karen Black from which the GOKB and their newest transgender member, Siobhan Meow, are recruited).</p>
<p>The remaining member on stage leaned over and squirted the crack pile with a turkey baster filled with thick white cream.  Immediately, the arching spurts of goo beautifully married ideas of infection and sexuality, a delicious combo.  Pfahler, who prefers the more delineative titles Anti-naturalist and Availabist to commonly used “performance artist” (rejecting the title, she believes “performance art” should rather be called “_____”), explains a bit of the comical yet purposefully disgusting intention behind “The Wall of Vagina”, “It’s important to have a different paradigm&#8230;we’re making fun of female sexuality.”  And her well orchestrated rejections to standards of feminine beauty and seductiveness resonate even during quiet moments of the act as the women stood still, horrifying, wide-eyed and robotic, conjuring semblance to an army of demonic inflatable sex dolls.</p>
<figure id="attachment_17443" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-17443" style="width: 234px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Wall_of_Vagina-2.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-17443  " title="Cast Member of &quot;The Wall of Vagina&quot; by the Girls of Karen Black, The Hole, New York, Monday, June 27, 2011. Photo by Rosalie Knox" src="https://artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Wall_of_Vagina-2.jpg" alt="Cast Member of &quot;The Wall of Vagina&quot; by the Girls of Karen Black, The Hole, New York, Monday, June 27, 2011. Photo by Rosalie Knox" width="234" height="350" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2011/07/Wall_of_Vagina-2.jpg 334w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2011/07/Wall_of_Vagina-2-200x300.jpg 200w" sizes="(max-width: 234px) 100vw, 234px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-17443" class="wp-caption-text">Cast Member of &quot;The Wall of Vagina&quot; by the Girls of Karen Black, The Hole, New York, Monday, June 27, 2011. Photo by Rosalie Knox</figcaption></figure>
<p>The attentive crowd cheered as the ladies unpiled, knelt down on one knee and raised their hands high in the air, an appropriate bow from so glorious a group.  And just like that, they trotted right out the door and the simple and saturated gesture was over.  As it was a loosely enforced invite-only event, I assume a good portion of the audience were fans who had a general sense of what to expect, so I was happy to see the brief resplendent horror satisfy their eager expectancy.</p>
<p>After the show, the ladies ventured back in the gallery posing for pictures while straddling one of their own handmade sculptures&#8230;real art on art action!  The piece, a larger than life black cat, meshed well with the gallery’s current exhibition, simply titled “:)“  A colorful playground of inflatable beings and cartoonish sculptures, the first NYC solo show by Miami duo FriendsWithYou provided a nice backdrop to the fun and playful feel of the night as well as setting precedent for what will fill The Hole in the future.</p>
<p>In keeping with its Soho predecessor, the sensational Deitch Projects, The Hole is a charming antidote to the usual hoity-toity gallery vibe.  “I want to provide a space for all of us,” proprietor Kathy Grayson, a former director of Deitch, tells me, “and that includes the big community of people displaced by Deitch closing and all these great young artists that are part of my network&#8230; I mean to stick by those guys and continue to present great works by them.”  Pfhaler, whose latest album “Fuck Island” will be released this October, described Grayson as, “&#8230;heroic and very intelligent, a huge talent.”  Defibrillators of our time, these ladies are set on shocking the pulse back into Manhattan.</p>
<p>By the end of the night, happy attendees piled onto the streets bearing residual bits of glitter and colorful streaks.  The brevity of the actual performance made the mixing and mingling of the unique personas seem as much a part of the event as the actual performance.  Personally, my love for the city has always been about these brief, fantastic moments where a varied crowd can come together and pay witness to the joy and horror of it all.   Please excuse their beauty.</p>
<figure id="attachment_17445" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-17445" style="width: 71px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Wall_of_Vagina-16.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-thumbnail wp-image-17445 " title="Performance of &quot;The Wall of Vagina&quot; by the Girls of Karen Black, The Hole, New York, Monday, June 27, 2011. Photo by Rosalie Knox" src="https://artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Wall_of_Vagina-16-71x71.jpg" alt="Performance of &quot;The Wall of Vagina&quot; by the Girls of Karen Black, The Hole, New York, Monday, June 27, 2011. Photo by Rosalie Knox" width="71" height="71" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2011/07/Wall_of_Vagina-16-71x71.jpg 71w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2011/07/Wall_of_Vagina-16-150x150.jpg 150w" sizes="(max-width: 71px) 100vw, 71px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-17445" class="wp-caption-text">click to enlarge</figcaption></figure>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2011/07/09/wall-of-vagina/">“The Wall of Vagina” at (where else?) The Hole</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://artcritical.com/2011/07/09/wall-of-vagina/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
