<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Uncategorized &#8211; artcritical</title>
	<atom:link href="https://artcritical.com/category/uncategorized/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://artcritical.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2022 22:32:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.5.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Featured Exhibition: Margaret Grimes Memorial Exhibition at Blue Mountain Gallery</title>
		<link>https://artcritical.com/2022/02/16/featured-exhibition-margaret-grimes-memorial-exhibition-at-blue-mountain-gallery/</link>
					<comments>https://artcritical.com/2022/02/16/featured-exhibition-margaret-grimes-memorial-exhibition-at-blue-mountain-gallery/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chief]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2022 22:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://artcritical.com/?p=81694</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Margaret Grimes was not just a painter of nature, she was a force of nature. She belongs to an illustrious lineage of artists depicting New England, in her case primarily Connecticut and Maine, and yet her take on this canonical terrain was always fresh and uniquely her own—won, in fact, from intrepid battling through forbidding &#8230; <a href="https://artcritical.com/2022/02/16/featured-exhibition-margaret-grimes-memorial-exhibition-at-blue-mountain-gallery/">Continued</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2022/02/16/featured-exhibition-margaret-grimes-memorial-exhibition-at-blue-mountain-gallery/">Featured Exhibition: Margaret Grimes Memorial Exhibition at Blue Mountain Gallery</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>Margaret Grimes was not just a painter of nature, she was a force of nature. She belongs to an illustrious lineage of artists depicting New England, in her case primarily Connecticut and Maine, and yet her take on this canonical terrain was always fresh and uniquely her own—won, in fact, from intrepid battling through forbidding obstacles in search of untrammeled wildness, which was her actual subject. As Susanna Coffey wrote in these pages in a tribute to Grimes when she died in 2020: “Each completed painting was the result of many trips to the place where it was first begun. She needed to revisit the foliage, lighting and weather conditions with which she had started. Of course, she struggled with the inevitable changes she found, for that is what she loved about painting landscape. Inspired by the intricacy and linearity of briary thickets, choking vines, entwined scrub or clumps of broken sticks and bare branches, she painted attentively, as if deciphering an ancient vegetal code. She not an artist who favored the picturesque.” This belated memorial exhibition, organized by her daughter Carolyn Wallace at Blue Mountain Gallery, is her 19th with this artists’ coop of which she was a founder member. Again, true to subject and personality alike, Margaret Grimes continued timeless traditions by being a founder of new institutions—her gallery being one and the highly regarded MFA program at Western Connecticut State University being another. DAVID COHEN</p>



<p>Through February 26, with closing day concert by Bill Warfield and friends, 2-4pm<br />547 West 27th Street, Suite 200.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2022/02/16/featured-exhibition-margaret-grimes-memorial-exhibition-at-blue-mountain-gallery/">Featured Exhibition: Margaret Grimes Memorial Exhibition at Blue Mountain Gallery</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://artcritical.com/2022/02/16/featured-exhibition-margaret-grimes-memorial-exhibition-at-blue-mountain-gallery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gravity and Levity: Tom Doyle in the mid-1960s</title>
		<link>https://artcritical.com/2022/02/07/marjorie-welish-on-tom-doyle/</link>
					<comments>https://artcritical.com/2022/02/07/marjorie-welish-on-tom-doyle/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marjorie Welish]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2022 03:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://artcritical.com/?p=81684</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Sculpture made in Germany 1964-65 was shown last fall at Zürcher Gallery</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2022/02/07/marjorie-welish-on-tom-doyle/">Gravity and Levity: Tom Doyle in the mid-1960s</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><em>Tom Doyle in Germany 1964-65 </em>at Zürcher Gallery</strong></p>
<p>September 16 to November 10, 2021<br />
33 Bleecker Street, between Lafayette Street and Bowery<br />
New York City, galeriezurcher.com</p>
<p><figure id="attachment_81685" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-81685" style="width: 550px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/4_TD1964-65InstallationViewbyAdamReich.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-81685"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-81685" src="https://artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/4_TD1964-65InstallationViewbyAdamReich.jpg" alt="Installation view: Tom Doyle in Germany 1964-65 at Zürcher Gallery, photo: Adam Reich" width="550" height="364" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2022/02/4_TD1964-65InstallationViewbyAdamReich.jpg 550w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2022/02/4_TD1964-65InstallationViewbyAdamReich-275x182.jpg 275w" sizes="(max-width: 550px) 100vw, 550px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-81685" class="wp-caption-text">Installation view: Tom Doyle in Germany 1964-65 at Zürcher Gallery, photo: Adam Reich</figcaption></figure></p>
<p>In today’s art world, there are those who dabble in sculpture to produce inflated toys at great expense.  Let Tom Doyle’s sculpture be offered as a counterexample.</p>
<p>As opposed to statuettes writ large, sculpture’s engaged space-time relations attain to a complexity of thought manifestly palpable in the here and now. By this dimensional complexity, what works is given a workout: that is how Tom Doyle’s sculptures establish themselves, that they are also playful does not trivialize them.</p>
<p>The validity of sculpture as altogether worthy, and thus our assumptions about its nature, come through the legacy of modernism, a legacy of modern art’s reinventing itself through the significant styles of Cubism, Constructivism and Surrealism, a complex genealogical stock in the art vineyards giving consequential vitality to art. Doyle would benefit from this and better develop his ‘American vernacular’, as the current exhibition has named it, through an assumption of hands-on craft at home in the modern European abstraction that had already begun to nurture sculpture’s version of Abstract Expressionism.</p>
<p><figure style="width: 275px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/RALLYALROUND1964-5_5’8”h.x4’9”w.x6’l.polychromewoodandsteelBdarkerlowres.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-81686"><img loading="lazy" class="size-medium wp-image-81686" src="https://artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/RALLYALROUND1964-5_5’8”h.x4’9”w.x6’l.polychromewoodandsteelBdarkerlowres-275x275.jpg" alt="Tom Doyle, Rally Al Round 1964-65" width="275" height="275" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2022/02/RALLYALROUND1964-5_5’8”h.x4’9”w.x6’l.polychromewoodandsteelBdarkerlowres-275x275.jpg 275w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2022/02/RALLYALROUND1964-5_5’8”h.x4’9”w.x6’l.polychromewoodandsteelBdarkerlowres-71x71.jpg 71w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2022/02/RALLYALROUND1964-5_5’8”h.x4’9”w.x6’l.polychromewoodandsteelBdarkerlowres-32x32.jpg 32w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2022/02/RALLYALROUND1964-5_5’8”h.x4’9”w.x6’l.polychromewoodandsteelBdarkerlowres-64x64.jpg 64w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2022/02/RALLYALROUND1964-5_5’8”h.x4’9”w.x6’l.polychromewoodandsteelBdarkerlowres-96x96.jpg 96w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2022/02/RALLYALROUND1964-5_5’8”h.x4’9”w.x6’l.polychromewoodandsteelBdarkerlowres-128x128.jpg 128w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2022/02/RALLYALROUND1964-5_5’8”h.x4’9”w.x6’l.polychromewoodandsteelBdarkerlowres-150x150.jpg 150w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2022/02/RALLYALROUND1964-5_5’8”h.x4’9”w.x6’l.polychromewoodandsteelBdarkerlowres.jpg 500w" sizes="(max-width: 275px) 100vw, 275px" /></a><figcaption class="wp-caption-text">Tom Doyle, Rally Al Round, 1964-65. Polychrome wood and steel, 68 x 57 x 72 inches. Courtesy of Tom Doyle and Zürcher Gallery</figcaption></figure></p>
<p>Located in Kettwig, Germany in 1964 for fifteen months, and being given the run of a disused wool factory, Doyle seized on the opportunity to construct assemblages of metal machine parts and wood scrap. That he was fluent in forging, taught to him as a child by a blacksmith while growing up in Ohio, made it possible for Doyle to develop his idiom from within, and yet while in Germany, at a remove from art-world pressures. According to art historian Kirsten Swenson‘s extensive interview much later, Doyle’s mature sculptural idiom emerged under conditions more permissive than those adopted by David Smith with his strong two-dimensional orientation; although respecting the art of David Smith, Doyle considered his own, gesturing exuberantly in three dimensions, more allied to David Weinrib, John Chamberlain and Mark di Suvero.</p>
<p>To look around plazas where public sculpture sits is to come to terms with the reality that we take the era of the 1960s for granted. But Doyle’s sculptures give us no recourse to passivity, or nostalgia, or the pleasant acceptance of applied abstraction in works interchangeable with one another. No tokens, but in singular works well developed within the formal premises set out, Doyle’s visual literacy is such that it shows as fully cognizant of the difference between the simplistic and the simple, complicated fuss and modulated structural integrity.</p>
<p><figure id="attachment_81687" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-81687" style="width: 275px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/SEDENTARYTAURUS1964-5_6’6”h.x4’3”w.x7’7”l.polychromewoodandsteel..jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-81687"><img loading="lazy" class="size-medium wp-image-81687" src="https://artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/SEDENTARYTAURUS1964-5_6’6”h.x4’3”w.x7’7”l.polychromewoodandsteel.-275x275.jpg" alt="Tom Doyle, Sedentary Taurus, 1964-65. Painted wood, steel and stainless steel, 84 x 48 x 48 inches. Courtesy of Tom Doyle and Zürcher Gallery" width="275" height="275" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2022/02/SEDENTARYTAURUS1964-5_6’6”h.x4’3”w.x7’7”l.polychromewoodandsteel.-275x275.jpg 275w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2022/02/SEDENTARYTAURUS1964-5_6’6”h.x4’3”w.x7’7”l.polychromewoodandsteel.-71x71.jpg 71w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2022/02/SEDENTARYTAURUS1964-5_6’6”h.x4’3”w.x7’7”l.polychromewoodandsteel.-32x32.jpg 32w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2022/02/SEDENTARYTAURUS1964-5_6’6”h.x4’3”w.x7’7”l.polychromewoodandsteel.-64x64.jpg 64w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2022/02/SEDENTARYTAURUS1964-5_6’6”h.x4’3”w.x7’7”l.polychromewoodandsteel.-96x96.jpg 96w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2022/02/SEDENTARYTAURUS1964-5_6’6”h.x4’3”w.x7’7”l.polychromewoodandsteel.-128x128.jpg 128w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2022/02/SEDENTARYTAURUS1964-5_6’6”h.x4’3”w.x7’7”l.polychromewoodandsteel.-150x150.jpg 150w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2022/02/SEDENTARYTAURUS1964-5_6’6”h.x4’3”w.x7’7”l.polychromewoodandsteel..jpg 500w" sizes="(max-width: 275px) 100vw, 275px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-81687" class="wp-caption-text">Tom Doyle, Sedentary Taurus, 1964-65. Painted wood, steel and stainless steel, 84 x 48 x 48 inches. Courtesy of Tom Doyle and Zürcher Gallery</figcaption></figure></p>
<p>A given of modernist theory is that sculpture, no longer a matter of mass, is volumetric, incorporating open and closed spatial relations as it can now by utilizing industrial materials for support and for counterintuitive heft. <em>Sedentary Taurus</em>, 1965, does the job. Folded and bent, cantilevered planar elements are hoisted atop a linear criss-cross frame, yet this basic antinomy is already modulated through skewed orientation and internal twist; voids and their opposite play out, yet not in platitudinous opposition. Helpful to development within form is internal scale: through twisting, large becoming small, then becoming larger again, as sculptural structure induces accelerated shifts through a spectator’s changed position. A changed position is here memory: what was is now still in play imaginatively, a recognition of the relations that still obtain.</p>
<p>How to evade mere décor: that is the problem set out in <em>Swallows Swoop Shiloh</em>, 1965. Doyle makes trouble for himself by invoking good taste: a few elements in neutral off-whites to which a single hue dramatizes the difference in furnishings&#8211;a kind of decorator’s “move.” But what he does to outflank taste is to keep the sculptural coherence of the entirety by way of a directness and roughness of the contrastive compound. Further evident is the principle of dislocation: what is massive is a blocky hewn wood element that could be a stand but is midway up; on the ground where the conventional stand should be is a painting—that is, a planar element in color.</p>
<p><figure id="attachment_81688" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-81688" style="width: 275px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/SWALLOWSSWOOPSHILOH1964-5_7’h.x4’w.x4’l.paintedwoodsteelstainlesssteel.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-81688"><img loading="lazy" class="size-medium wp-image-81688" src="https://artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/SWALLOWSSWOOPSHILOH1964-5_7’h.x4’w.x4’l.paintedwoodsteelstainlesssteel-275x374.jpg" alt="Tom Doyle, Swallows Swoop Shiloh, 1965. Polychrome wood and steel, 68 x 57 x 72 inches. Courtesy of Tom Doyle and Zürcher Gallery" width="275" height="374" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2022/02/SWALLOWSSWOOPSHILOH1964-5_7’h.x4’w.x4’l.paintedwoodsteelstainlesssteel-275x374.jpg 275w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2022/02/SWALLOWSSWOOPSHILOH1964-5_7’h.x4’w.x4’l.paintedwoodsteelstainlesssteel.jpg 368w" sizes="(max-width: 275px) 100vw, 275px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-81688" class="wp-caption-text">Tom Doyle, Swallows Swoop Shiloh, 1965. Polychrome wood and steel, 68 x 57 x 72 inches. Courtesy of Tom Doyle and Zürcher Gallery</figcaption></figure></p>
<p>Color is indeed the proverbial elephant-in-the-room. The well-known and on-going ideological wars within modern art theory do provide a profound understanding of genre, excelling at its definition: sculpture, the art of three-dimensional work, painting, the art of two-dimensional work—not some mash-up of categories to compensate for a lack of artisanal rigor. But to this, de Stijl has a classic modernist rebuttal: the largest aesthetic category being neither painting nor sculpture, but design. Indicating functional difference through color, then, is a pragmatic strategy, De Stijl design offers a way through space not beholden to isolating the types of practice. So in <em>Swallows Swoop Shiloh,</em> the function of the base gets its due. Meanwhile, antithetical to painting, the color plane is not on the wall where “it ought to be,” but by a radical dislocation makes its appearance on the floor as the necessary base engenders a sculptural presence.</p>
<p>By the way, for the taxonomy of mass, see Doyle’s <em>Rally Al Round</em>, 1964: a sidelong glance at the geometric elemental form by which cylinder, sphere and cone are primary structures.</p>
<p>In Doyle’s art, knowledge of the tradition is enabling, not disabling, as it gives him the formal instrumentalities with which to think with the medium. Let us count the ways: point, line, plane; vertical, horizontal, diagonal, and torque for these: as well as folds, bends, bends’ reversing convexity to concavity’s implicating volumetric space; scale within volume, opacity, transparency at eye level, above and below the same; gravity and levity&#8211;degrees of.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2022/02/07/marjorie-welish-on-tom-doyle/">Gravity and Levity: Tom Doyle in the mid-1960s</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://artcritical.com/2022/02/07/marjorie-welish-on-tom-doyle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Review Panel, Guest of Brooklyn Rail&#8217;s the New Social Environment, Zoom, Friday, at 1PM ET</title>
		<link>https://artcritical.com/2021/11/13/review-panel-guest-brooklyn-rail/</link>
					<comments>https://artcritical.com/2021/11/13/review-panel-guest-brooklyn-rail/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chief]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2021 16:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://artcritical.com/?p=81641</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>To mark the 17th anniversary of The Review Panel, hitherto hosted by the National Academy Museum and by Brooklyn Public Library, the Brooklyn Rail has invited artcritical to participate in its ongoing daily Zoom series, the New Social Environment. Moderator David Cohen will present a garland of three mini-panels, reviewing four exhibition. Reserve your spot here &#8230; <a href="https://artcritical.com/2021/11/13/review-panel-guest-brooklyn-rail/">Continued</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2021/11/13/review-panel-guest-brooklyn-rail/">The Review Panel, Guest of Brooklyn Rail&#8217;s the New Social Environment, Zoom, Friday, at 1PM ET</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To mark the 17th anniversary of The Review Panel, hitherto hosted by the National Academy Museum and by Brooklyn Public Library, the Brooklyn Rail has invited artcritical to participate in its ongoing daily Zoom series, the New Social Environment. Moderator David Cohen will present a garland of three mini-panels, reviewing four exhibition. Reserve your spot <a href="https://brooklynrail.org/events/2021/11/19/artcritical-17-years-of-the-review-panel/#register" target="_blank">here</a></p>
<div>
<p><figure id="attachment_81642" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-81642" style="width: 550px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/rockburne-e1636821204223.jpeg" rel="attachment wp-att-81642"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-81642" src="https://artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/rockburne-e1636821204223.jpeg" alt="Dorothea Rockburne, Trefoil 5, 2021" width="550" height="353" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2021/11/rockburne-e1636821204223.jpeg 550w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2021/11/rockburne-e1636821204223-275x177.jpeg 275w" sizes="(max-width: 550px) 100vw, 550px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-81642" class="wp-caption-text">Dorothea Rockburne, Trefoil 5, 2021</figcaption></figure></p>
<p>Sharmistha Ray, Barry Schwabsky and Marjorie Welish discuss <b>Dorothea Rockburne: Giotto&#8217;s Angels &amp; Knots</b> at David Nolan Gallery, 24 East 81st Street, Fourth Floor (on view through December 23)</p>
<p>David Brody, Lilly Wei and Alexi Worth discuss <b>Intersections: Ron Baron and Sarah Walker</b> at John Molloy Gallery, 49 East 78th Street, Suite 2B (on view through December 18)</p>
</div>
<div>Karen E. Jones, Christopher Stackhouse and Robert Storr discuss <b>Glenn Ligon: It&#8217;s Always a Little Bit Not Yet </b>at Hauser &amp; Wirth, 542 West 22nd Street (on view through December 23) and <b>Whitfield Lovell: Le Rouge et Le Noir</b> at DC Moore Gallery, 535 West 22nd Street, second floor (on view through December 18)</div>
<div></div>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2021/11/13/review-panel-guest-brooklyn-rail/">The Review Panel, Guest of Brooklyn Rail&#8217;s the New Social Environment, Zoom, Friday, at 1PM ET</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://artcritical.com/2021/11/13/review-panel-guest-brooklyn-rail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>A panel today on Lennart Anderson at the Resnick-Passlof Foundation with painters Steve Hicks, Rachel Rickert and Kyle Staver, 4-6PM</title>
		<link>https://artcritical.com/2021/11/13/81635/</link>
					<comments>https://artcritical.com/2021/11/13/81635/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Cohen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2021 16:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://artcritical.com/?p=81635</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>It takes an exhibition. Despite being in his studio every day, Lennart Anderson, who died in 2015 left a relatively modest oeuvre. An artist of legendary tonal subtlety, he obsessively reworked his classical idylls, contemporary street-scenes, portraits and still lifes over many years. In his last decade, Anderson was the victim of macular degeneration, persevering &#8230; <a href="https://artcritical.com/2021/11/13/81635/">Continued</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2021/11/13/81635/">A panel today on Lennart Anderson at the Resnick-Passlof Foundation with painters Steve Hicks, Rachel Rickert and Kyle Staver, 4-6PM</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It takes an exhibition. Despite being in his studio every day, Lennart Anderson, who died in 2015 left a relatively modest oeuvre. An artist of legendary tonal subtlety, he obsessively reworked his classical idylls, contemporary street-scenes, portraits and still lifes over many years. In his last decade, Anderson was the victim of macular degeneration, persevering nonetheless with up-close paintings dependent upon peripheral vision: like, in their late years, his artist touchstones Titian and Degas, he was legally blind. Now, with sponsorship from the American Macular Degeneration Foundation, among others, the New York Studio School has mounted a traveling exhibition of his work that draws together over two dozen heavy hitters from his sparse output that reveals the vastness of his quiet painterly ambition.</p>
<p>The panel of three painters (Rickert is co-curator with Graham Nickson of the Studio School exhibition, on view through November 28) is moderated by David Cohen and takes place amidst the Resnick-Passloff’s own newly-opened exhibition “Jane Freilicher and Thomas Nozkowski: True Fictions”. The Anderson exhibition’s sumptuous catalogue ($45) will be available with contributions by Martica Sawin, Susan Jane Walp, and Paul Resika, and an interview with the artist by Jennifer Samet.</p>
<p>The panel is sold out, but standby tickets ($15) will be released at 4.15pm. 87b Eldridge Street, between Grand and Hester.</p>
<p>Lennart Anderson, Nude, 1961-1964. Oil on canvas, 58-1/2 x 50 inches. Brooklyn Museum, John B. Woodward Memorial Fund</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2021/11/13/81635/">A panel today on Lennart Anderson at the Resnick-Passlof Foundation with painters Steve Hicks, Rachel Rickert and Kyle Staver, 4-6PM</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://artcritical.com/2021/11/13/81635/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Silent Auction at the New York Studio School</title>
		<link>https://artcritical.com/2021/10/12/silent-auction-new-york-studio-school/</link>
					<comments>https://artcritical.com/2021/10/12/silent-auction-new-york-studio-school/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chief]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2021 17:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://artcritical.com/?p=81610</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>David Cohen has been invited to MC the closing of the silent auction at this year’s virtual gala for the New York Studio School, which he feels to be a “signature honor.” You can see the works on offer and start bidding already at bidpal.net/nyssbenefit. Yesterday Cohen recorded an Instagram Live walkthrough of selected treasures, &#8230; <a href="https://artcritical.com/2021/10/12/silent-auction-new-york-studio-school/">Continued</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2021/10/12/silent-auction-new-york-studio-school/">Silent Auction at the New York Studio School</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Screen-Shot-2021-10-12-at-12.25.09-PM.png" rel="attachment wp-att-81611"><img loading="lazy" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-81611" src="https://artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Screen-Shot-2021-10-12-at-12.25.09-PM.png" alt="Screen Shot 2021-10-12 at 12.25.09 PM" width="550" height="410" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2021/10/Screen-Shot-2021-10-12-at-12.25.09-PM.png 550w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2021/10/Screen-Shot-2021-10-12-at-12.25.09-PM-275x205.png 275w" sizes="(max-width: 550px) 100vw, 550px" /></a></p>
<p>David Cohen has been invited to MC the closing of the silent auction at this year’s virtual gala for the New York Studio School, which he feels to be a “signature honor.” You can see the works on offer and start bidding already at <a href="https://one.bidpal.net/nyssbenefit/welcome">bidpal.net/nyssbenefit</a>. Yesterday Cohen recorded an <a href="https://www.instagram.com/tv/CU5dmhjlw7a/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link">Instagram Live</a> walkthrough of selected treasures, discussing scale and texture in works by Kamini Avril, Andrea Belag, Susanna Coffey, Cora Cohen, Lois Dodd, Angela Dufresne, Bruce Gagnier, David Humphrey, Alex Katz, Medrie MacPhee, Graham Nickson, Janice Nowinski, Sean Scully, Stuart Shils, Kyle Staver and Susan Vecsey.</p>
<p>Kamini Avril’s effulgent small oil painting, Forsythia, 2019, pictured here, is valued at $1800 with an opening bid of $650</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2021/10/12/silent-auction-new-york-studio-school/">Silent Auction at the New York Studio School</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://artcritical.com/2021/10/12/silent-auction-new-york-studio-school/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Howard Sherman discusses his work with David Cohen on Zoom this evening at 6.30PM EST</title>
		<link>https://artcritical.com/2021/10/12/howard-shearman-discusses-work-david-cohen-zoom-evening-6-30pm-est/</link>
					<comments>https://artcritical.com/2021/10/12/howard-shearman-discusses-work-david-cohen-zoom-evening-6-30pm-est/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[THE EDITORS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2021 16:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://artcritical.com/?p=81605</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Based in his hometown of Houston, Tx and in New York City, Howard Sherman graduated with an MFA from the University of North Texas in 2006 since when his gutsy abstract paintings and assemblages, seen by some as a contemporary form of “action painting”, is much sought after by institutions and private collectors in Texas &#8230; <a href="https://artcritical.com/2021/10/12/howard-shearman-discusses-work-david-cohen-zoom-evening-6-30pm-est/">Continued</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2021/10/12/howard-shearman-discusses-work-david-cohen-zoom-evening-6-30pm-est/">Howard Sherman discusses his work with David Cohen on Zoom this evening at 6.30PM EST</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Based in his hometown of Houston, Tx and in New York City, Howard Sherman graduated with an MFA from the University of North Texas in 2006 since when his gutsy abstract paintings and assemblages, seen by some as a contemporary form of “action painting”, is much sought after by institutions and private collectors in Texas and beyond. Pictured here is Feeding off the Land Like an Animal, 2015 in a private collection. Sherman is to be the subject of a monograph published by Snap Editions in 2022 with essays by Alex Bacon and Andrea Karnes and an interview with David Cohen, for which this <a href="https://us02web.zoom.us/j/89457790639?pwd=Qmhhc0VIOTRxeDJrWkhsVERxQnRjdz09">Zoom</a> is preparation. [Apology: in an earlier version of this newsletter the artist&#8217;s name was misspelled].</p>
<p>Meeting ID: 894 5779 0639<br />
Passcode: 060676</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2021/10/12/howard-shearman-discusses-work-david-cohen-zoom-evening-6-30pm-est/">Howard Sherman discusses his work with David Cohen on Zoom this evening at 6.30PM EST</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://artcritical.com/2021/10/12/howard-shearman-discusses-work-david-cohen-zoom-evening-6-30pm-est/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Entwining of Image and Object: Richard Rezac&#8217;s Sculpture</title>
		<link>https://artcritical.com/2021/07/27/entwining-image-object-richard-rezacs-sculpture/</link>
					<comments>https://artcritical.com/2021/07/27/entwining-image-object-richard-rezacs-sculpture/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marjorie Welish]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2021 17:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[A Topical Pick from the Archives]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://artcritical.com?p=81559&#038;preview_id=81559</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>His first New York show in ten years was at Luhring Augustine this summer</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2021/07/27/entwining-image-object-richard-rezacs-sculpture/">The Entwining of Image and Object: Richard Rezac&#8217;s Sculpture</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Richard Rezac&#8217;s debut show at Luhring Augustine, reviewed here by Marjorie Welish, opened at their Chelsea branch on March 14, 2020. Beware the Ides of March, as Caesar was warned: the next day galleries were obliged to shutter, although they remained open by appointment to a limited audience. To give the artist his due, this new exhibition, from which Rezac has selected five works from last year&#8217;s exhibition and which he has titled Pleat, runs at Luhring Augustine Tribeca through August 6, 2021. The Welish review serves Pleat well given the similar (and overlapping) content of the two shows.</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Richard Rezac at Luhring Augustine Chelsea</strong></p>
<p>531 West 24th Street, between 10th and 11th avenues<br />
New York City, luhringaugustine.com</p>
<div class="text"></div>
<p><figure id="attachment_81235" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-81235" style="width: 550px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/rezac-install.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-81235"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-81235" src="https://artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/rezac-install.jpg" alt="Installation shot of Richard Rezac's show at Luhring Augustine Chelsea, with Chigi, 2017 in the foreground" width="550" height="412" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2020/10/rezac-install.jpg 550w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2020/10/rezac-install-275x205.jpg 275w" sizes="(max-width: 550px) 100vw, 550px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-81235" class="wp-caption-text">Installation shot of Richard Rezac&#8217;s show at Luhring Augustine Chelsea, with Chigi, 2017 in the foreground</figcaption></figure></p>
<p>A drawing in a project room of Richard Rezac’s solo exhibition this summer at Luhring Augustine was at once plan and elevation, as elegant as it was documentary—but of what, the viewer might ask? Provisionally it be called a thingmabob.</p>
<p>On consideration, one can discover a legitimate way of naming these works, as Rezac’s catalogue essayist Graham Bader does, as the <em>entwining</em> object and image. This set of terms is more than merely felicitous. “Object” and “image” are not mere words chosen at random but key terms in the history of ideas through which significant aesthetic ideologies have fought for creative co-existence. (Put differently: not all things are art; criteria matter.) When Donald Judd speaks of objects, what gives his reductive modernism force is that Constructivist engineering has informed his thinking, a certain narrative by which sculpture is non-trivial. Or, when André Breton and Aimé Césaire speak of an image, they are wielding the instrumentality of Surrealism to get at psychological and political resistance and revolt. No mere juxtaposition will do: under the rule of metamorphosis, sense becomes other: a kind of signifying non-sense, or otherwise, an annealing synthesis.</p>
<p><figure id="attachment_81236" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-81236" style="width: 275px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Rezac-Chigi-Pamphili.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-81236"><img loading="lazy" class="size-medium wp-image-81236" src="https://artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Rezac-Chigi-Pamphili-275x219.jpg" alt="Richard Rezac, Chigi, Pamphili, 2019. Aluminum, painted cast bronze, woven cotton, 25-1/2 x 26-1/2 x 10-1/2 inches. . Courtesy of Luhring Augustine" width="275" height="219" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2020/10/Rezac-Chigi-Pamphili-275x219.jpg 275w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2020/10/Rezac-Chigi-Pamphili.jpg 542w" sizes="(max-width: 275px) 100vw, 275px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-81236" class="wp-caption-text">Richard Rezac, Chigi, Pamphili, 2019. Aluminum, painted cast bronze, woven cotton, 25-1/2 x 26-1/2 x 10-1/2 inches. . Courtesy of Luhring Augustine</figcaption></figure></p>
<p>The relevance of object-image to Rezac’s works is spot-on. What should be frivolous in his art is not, because the object’s physical properties forge a connection through strong antinomies. The image comes into sharp enigmatic focus through an unapologetic assertion of difference.Take <em> Soliloquy</em> (2019) for example. In some parallel universe, a carpenter’s workbench and underground grain vaults cohabit, and the resulting tool plays a practical role.  Another work, <em>Untitled</em> (<em>19-05</em>) (2019) consists of a table atop of which is some sort of dune. If this artifact coheres it is owing to an unsaid force whereby heavy rectilinear gravity is tipped toward image by an unshapely shape atop it. Of the considerable inventiveness typical of Rezac, perhaps the least effective is the most apparently inventive: the suspended piece, <em>Chigi, Pamphili</em>, (2019), an assemblage with three elements that remain unassimilated and, hence, rather twee.</p>
<p>Relief assumes the orientation of painting yet with the rights and privileges of sculpture. Through the binding of painting with sculpture comes a certain gravitas, as with the cast bronze <em>Untitled (18-06) </em>(2018). The causes are clear. Small as most of this sculptor’s works are, the size of this piece is not diminutive as it falls within the viewer’s normal sight lines. And even so, smaller than most paintings typically are, this relief and almost all others, draws the view close, enlarging the subtly calibrated craft for engaged <u> </u>perception. Rezac’s choice of scale, then, brings material and technique into view as a constructed intensity embedded in planarity. Relief is sculptural compression. Here lies the force of its construct. Tension between technologies is a content of that construct, a kind of agon despite the patterning —Indeed, because of it, given that Rezac flaunts ornamentally and structurally extremes in the same .   <em>Untitled (19-11) (2019) .</em>Why can its overt decoration of the diaper pattern seem engaged between clamps? Think of the suction cups for footpads of a gecko on a tree branch.</p>
<p><figure id="attachment_81237" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-81237" style="width: 275px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Rezac-1911.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-81237"><img loading="lazy" class="size-medium wp-image-81237" src="https://artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Rezac-1911-275x256.jpg" alt="Richard Rezac, Untitled (19-11), 2019. Painted wood, aluminum, 45 x 61-3/4 x 1-1/4 inches. Courtesy of Luhring Augustine" width="275" height="256" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2020/10/Rezac-1911-275x256.jpg 275w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2020/10/Rezac-1911.jpg 550w" sizes="(max-width: 275px) 100vw, 275px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-81237" class="wp-caption-text">Richard Rezac, Untitled (19-11), 2019. Painted wood, aluminum, 45 x 61-3/4 x 1-1/4 inches. Courtesy of Luhring Augustine</figcaption></figure></p>
<p><figure id="attachment_81238" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-81238" style="width: 275px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Rezac-Soliloquy.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-81238"><img loading="lazy" class="size-medium wp-image-81238" src="https://artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Rezac-Soliloquy-275x187.jpg" alt="Richard Rezac, Soliloquy, 2019. Aluminum, cast bronze, painted cast aluminum, 9-1/4 x 34 x 13 inches. Courtesy of Luhring Augustine" width="275" height="187" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2020/10/Rezac-Soliloquy-275x187.jpg 275w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2020/10/Rezac-Soliloquy.jpg 550w" sizes="(max-width: 275px) 100vw, 275px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-81238" class="wp-caption-text">Richard Rezac, Soliloquy, 2019. Aluminum, cast bronze, painted cast aluminum, 9-1/4 x 34 x 13 inches. Courtesy of Luhring Augustine</figcaption></figure></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2021/07/27/entwining-image-object-richard-rezacs-sculpture/">The Entwining of Image and Object: Richard Rezac&#8217;s Sculpture</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://artcritical.com/2021/07/27/entwining-image-object-richard-rezacs-sculpture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jennifer Coates in the National Arts Club&#8217;s Exhibition, &#8220;Painting the Narrative&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://artcritical.com/2021/06/05/jennifer-coates-national-arts-clubs-exhibition-painting-narrative/</link>
					<comments>https://artcritical.com/2021/06/05/jennifer-coates-national-arts-clubs-exhibition-painting-narrative/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[THE EDITORS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2021 17:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://artcritical.com/?p=81534</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Dee Shapiro has gathered a spirited cross section of storytellers in paint in an exhibition that also showcases works by Laura Karetzky, Judith Linhares, Ernesto Renda, Kyle Staver, and George Towne. Coates&#8217;s almost ribald bacchanalia manages to channel modernism and classicism simultaneously, a kind of Derainean riff on Poussin. The exhibition continues at Grammercy Square through &#8230; <a href="https://artcritical.com/2021/06/05/jennifer-coates-national-arts-clubs-exhibition-painting-narrative/">Continued</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2021/06/05/jennifer-coates-national-arts-clubs-exhibition-painting-narrative/">Jennifer Coates in the National Arts Club&#8217;s Exhibition, &#8220;Painting the Narrative&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dee Shapiro has gathered a spirited cross section of storytellers in paint in an exhibition that also showcases works by Laura Karetzky, Judith Linhares, Ernesto Renda, Kyle Staver, and George Towne. Coates&#8217;s almost ribald bacchanalia manages to channel modernism and classicism simultaneously, a kind of Derainean riff on Poussin. The exhibition continues at Grammercy Square through June 28, by appointment. Coates meanwhile is also showing nine drawing made last April under lockdown at 136 Eldridge Street in a pop up exhibition, open through June 27. Actually, these are not just lockdown drawings but sickbed drawings, indeed. A sign of mastery or courage (art history will decide!) to say that (even) at COVID 19&#8217;s door, Coates could draw thusly.  DAVID COHEN</p>
<p>Jennifer Coates, Triumph of Pan, 2020. Acrylic and spray paint on canvas, 60 x 72 inches. Courtesy of the Artist</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2021/06/05/jennifer-coates-national-arts-clubs-exhibition-painting-narrative/">Jennifer Coates in the National Arts Club&#8217;s Exhibition, &#8220;Painting the Narrative&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://artcritical.com/2021/06/05/jennifer-coates-national-arts-clubs-exhibition-painting-narrative/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brenda Zlamany at the Grand Flag Project</title>
		<link>https://artcritical.com/2021/04/08/brenda-zlamany-grand-flag-project/</link>
					<comments>https://artcritical.com/2021/04/08/brenda-zlamany-grand-flag-project/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Cohen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2021 16:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://artcritical.com/?p=81451</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Defiance, celebration, warning, rallying: There are so many good reasons to unfurl a flag. Some of those hoisted above his home by artist James Esber on Williamsburg’s Grand Street entreated citizens to vote recently, although others over the years have defied the raison d’etre of flags with witty subversions intellectually worthy of the bohemian hood. But Brenda Zlamany’s double-sided masked &#8230; <a href="https://artcritical.com/2021/04/08/brenda-zlamany-grand-flag-project/">Continued</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2021/04/08/brenda-zlamany-grand-flag-project/">Brenda Zlamany at the Grand Flag Project</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Defiance, celebration, warning, rallying: There are so many good reasons to unfurl a flag. Some of those hoisted above his home by artist James Esber on Williamsburg’s Grand Street entreated citizens to vote recently, although others over the years have defied the raison d’etre of flags with witty subversions intellectually worthy of the bohemian hood. But Brenda Zlamany’s double-sided masked portraits actually conform to a plague-fighting remit. Real, living human visages peep out from the functional, life-saving fabrics which themselves often deploy the signifiers and tropes of heraldry: symbols, fields, words. A portrait of fellow artist Justin Sterling peers out from a lined cloth whose tapering black strokes on a white ground recall a <em>kaffiyeh </em>in just the right balance of protection and resistance.</p>
<p>Above Store For Rent Gallery at 179 Grand Street, Brooklyn, New York. Best viewed from the north-west corner of Bedford and Grand<br />
There are two flags alternating week by week through April 9, with changing flags at 4pm Fridays<br />
Mask Flag 1 features Justin Sterling (pictured) and Joel Lahey, Mask Flag 2 features Helen Oji and Adé.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2021/04/08/brenda-zlamany-grand-flag-project/">Brenda Zlamany at the Grand Flag Project</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://artcritical.com/2021/04/08/brenda-zlamany-grand-flag-project/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jennifer Riley at 1GAPGallery, Grand Army Plaza, Brooklyn</title>
		<link>https://artcritical.com/2021/02/10/jennifer-riley-1gapgallery-grand-army-plaza-brooklyn/</link>
					<comments>https://artcritical.com/2021/02/10/jennifer-riley-1gapgallery-grand-army-plaza-brooklyn/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chief]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2021 23:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://artcritical.com/?p=81396</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>COVID has canceled countless exhibitions, projects, events. But in a subtler grade of cruelty, for shows that have gone ahead there has been stunted attendance and muted fanfare in what are nonetheless turning points in artists’ careers. Jennifer Riley has recently opened a solo exhibition (which I curated) at the 1GAP Gallery in the Richard &#8230; <a href="https://artcritical.com/2021/02/10/jennifer-riley-1gapgallery-grand-army-plaza-brooklyn/">Continued</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2021/02/10/jennifer-riley-1gapgallery-grand-army-plaza-brooklyn/">Jennifer Riley at 1GAPGallery, Grand Army Plaza, Brooklyn</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><figure id="attachment_81397" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-81397" style="width: 550px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/riley-for-newsletter.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-81397"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-81397" src="https://artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/riley-for-newsletter.jpg" alt="Installation shot © Adrian Wilson" width="550" height="371" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2021/02/riley-for-newsletter.jpg 550w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2021/02/riley-for-newsletter-275x186.jpg 275w" sizes="(max-width: 550px) 100vw, 550px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-81397" class="wp-caption-text">Installation shot © Adrian Wilson</figcaption></figure></p>
<p>COVID has canceled countless exhibitions, projects, events. But in a subtler grade of cruelty, for shows that have gone ahead there has been stunted attendance and muted fanfare in what are nonetheless turning points in artists’ careers. Jennifer Riley has recently opened a solo exhibition (which I curated) at the 1GAP Gallery in the Richard Meier-designed condo building that in healthier days hosts the afterparties for The Review Panel. The lobbies, common rooms and elevator landings are filled with her lush, voluptuous abstraction. The centerpiece of her show is a mural, BBS1GG, Schmetterlinghaus, 2021, an audacious painted wall with richly colored steel and wood protrusions, utilizing what has become a signature element in Riley’s work, the  steel “skeletons” from which engine parts have been plasma cut. Named for the “Butterfly House” at Vienna Zoo, this is a departure for this otherwise resolutely abstract artist. With its skyscrapers, sun and fluttering butterflies, Riley was determined to appeal to the condo’s children while also speaking to all of us who have been cooped up for months during the pandemic. The butterfly, like her repurposed industrial materials, is a potent symbol of transformation.</p>
<p>While the show is open strictly by appointment with the artist or the curator, there is ray of hope for the curious and intrepid: The blinds and the lights will be kept up at night, giving pedestrians a private view of the mural from the street. It’s a stunning work: go see for yourself! DAVID COHEN</p>
<p>Through April 20, 1 Grand Army Plaza, between St John’s Place and Eastern Parkway, Brooklyn (opposite Brooklyn Public Library).</p>
<p>Installation shot © Adrian Wilson</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2021/02/10/jennifer-riley-1gapgallery-grand-army-plaza-brooklyn/">Jennifer Riley at 1GAPGallery, Grand Army Plaza, Brooklyn</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://artcritical.com/2021/02/10/jennifer-riley-1gapgallery-grand-army-plaza-brooklyn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
