<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Adkins| Terry &#8211; artcritical</title>
	<atom:link href="https://artcritical.com/tag/adkins-terry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://artcritical.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2017 00:26:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.5.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>&#8220;Material Potentialities&#8221;: Terry Adkins and His Influence</title>
		<link>https://artcritical.com/2017/01/31/a-m-weaver-on-terry-adkins/</link>
					<comments>https://artcritical.com/2017/01/31/a-m-weaver-on-terry-adkins/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A.M. Weaver]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2017 00:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Exhibitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adkins| Terry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arthur Ross Gallery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blackness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyrus| Jamal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neff| Matt]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.artcritical.com/?p=65233</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>An important exhibition, last year, at Penn's Arthur Ross Gallery</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2017/01/31/a-m-weaver-on-terry-adkins/">&#8220;Material Potentialities&#8221;: Terry Adkins and His Influence</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><em>Darkwater Revival: After Terry Adkins</em> at the Arthur Ross Gallery, University of Pennsylvania</strong></p>
<p>August 27 to December 11, 2016<br />
220 South 34th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104</p>
<figure id="attachment_65234" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-65234" style="width: 550px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Matt-Neffs-Untitled-e1485907588208.png" rel="attachment wp-att-65234"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-65234" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Matt-Neffs-Untitled-e1485907588208.png" alt="Matt Neff, Untitled, 2014. Plexiglas, metal, tape, fluorescent lights, dimensions variable. Courtesy of the Artist" width="550" height="364" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2017/01/Matt-Neffs-Untitled-e1485907588208.png 550w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2017/01/Matt-Neffs-Untitled-e1485907588208-275x182.png 275w" sizes="(max-width: 550px) 100vw, 550px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-65234" class="wp-caption-text">Matt Neff, Untitled, 2014. Plexiglas, metal, tape, fluorescent lights, dimensions variable. Courtesy of the Artist</figcaption></figure>
<p>Terry Adkins, a professor of Fine Arts in the School of Design at the University of Pennsylvania for 14 years, died in 2014 leaving a puissant legacy both in terms of his own works and peers and students influenced. “Darkwater Revival: After Terry Adkins,” at the Arthur Ross Gallery at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia, required several viewings. Although a modest-sized gallery, the work of twelve artists, as well as Adkins himself, are on display. The show not only celebrates salient works by Adkins that were part of his 2002 multidisciplinary exhibit “Darkwater: A Recital in Four Dominions, Terry Adkins After W.E.B. Du Bois,” but presents the art created by students and colleagues who were close to him.</p>
<p>Adkins was a conceptual artist involved in creating work from discarded material and instruments, as well as a performance artist and musician well versed in jazz and experimental music. He tied his performances to his sculptures and installations, expounding on concepts transcendence, spirituality and blackness. Between 1999 and 2014, he chronicled in his ”material potentialities,” the life and work of such historic figure as W.E.B. DuBois, Ludwig van Beethoven, Jimi Hendrix and the insurrectionary abolitionist John Brown,</p>
<p>At times difficult and obtuse, Adkins has inspired several generations. Having great faith in his vision, I was able to document a myriad of references and directives in his work while researching a 1998 essay for an exhibition of his work at the Institute of Contemporary Art Philadelphia. A deep thinker with a booming laugh, he created works that sparked the imagination and offered conundrums about politics, black narrative histories and man’s spiritual quests. “Darkwater Revival” includes six of his artworks. <em>Darkwater Record</em> (2002–08) is a moderate sized “combine,” in contrast to his signature monumental installations. A porcelain bust of Mao Tse-tung rests on top of a collection of Nakamichi 550 cassette tape decks. The needles on the dial of the decks indicate that recordings are supposedly playing Du Bois’s speeches on socialism and the American Negro, but the work was designed to give evidence of sound with no actual audio. (In 2002, a previous version of the work included sealed FBI files on Du Bois.) In this partial presentation, actually hearing Du Bois’s speeches would be desirable, but the silence of the piece again highlights an integral part of Adkins’s intent. Adkins often played with sound and silence , which often represented forgotten or muffled histories.</p>
<figure id="attachment_65235" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-65235" style="width: 275px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Terry_Adkins_Sermonesque-800x1160-e1485907874238.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-65235"><img loading="lazy" class="wp-image-65235 size-medium" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Terry_Adkins_Sermonesque-800x1160-275x399.jpg" alt="Terry Adkins, Sermonesque (from Darkwater), 2002. Metal with snare drum and buttons, 54 × 72 × 108 inches. Estate of Terry Adkins, Courtesy Salon 94" width="275" height="399" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-65235" class="wp-caption-text">Terry Adkins, Sermonesque (from Darkwater), 2002. Metal with snare drum and buttons, 54 × 72 × 108 inches. Estate of Terry Adkins, Courtesy Salon 94</figcaption></figure>
<p><em>Sermonesque</em> (2002) is a suspended snare drum within the lattice of a nine-foot-tall wrought-iron cage. Here, the drum, an instrument related to African-American music traditions and African culture, and the wrought-iron frame, suggestive of a principle occupation, smithing, held by blacks during and after slavery, are inherently powerful insignia. Additionally, select works by Adkins relate to musical ideas: two gelatin silver prints of music disks that predate phonographs, possibly of folk music, and a video of wafting smoke that surrounds the crown of a curly coif. To the uninitiated, the prints might appear to be cartographic renditions of the firmament. Du Bois’s concern with southern musical traditions is integral to his seminal work, <em>The Souls of Black Folk</em> (1903). Along with its mystical visuals, the video <em>Harmonic Spheres,</em> 2012, features a score Adkins created with his protégé, Demetrius Oliver. Overall, “Darkwater Revival,” in both of its manifestations, takes a close look through signs and symbols at the life, philosophy and work by W. E. B. Du Bois.</p>
<p>Included in the exhibit are sculptures, videos, mixed media works, prints and photo-based work by Ernel Martinez and Keir Johnston of Amber Arts and Design, and Wilmer Wilson, among others. Of note was a performance <em>Push/Pull The Weight</em> held on Martyrs Day by Martinez and Johnston at the gallery. Their piece paid homage to the abolitionist John Brown another personage that Adkins heralded. Full of symbolism, with flags of gold and black and a central totem Martinez laboriously builds using steel disc brakes that jostled the nerves when they were dropped onto a giant wooden spindle, the performance exemplified struggle and resilience and was accompanied by an improv musical score by June Lopez.</p>
<p>Matt Neff’s sculptures dominate the main floor of the gallery and are a tour de force; having work closely with Adkins in the past as a student and assistant, he has taken to another level Adkins’s approach to making art using found materials. The works transcend the sum of their parts. In <em>Untitled</em>, 2014,Neff uses found aluminum railings and panels of Plexiglas lit by fluorescent lights, flanked by rims from a small truck. This sculpture reads as an elegant structure and belies the materials used. However, Neff states that he is concerned with historical and current negotiations of power and privilege. These issues are not overtly apparent in the work on display as part of &#8220;Darkwater Revival&#8221; here; rather, his sculptures here are appreciable for their formal qualities and Modernist sensibilities.</p>
<p>Sarah Tortora also embraces lessons from Modernism. Her geometric suspended painted reliefs made of wood have appendages that appear to hover in space. Sean Riley deconstructs pieces of denim to create quasi-geometric shards. Jamal Cyrus ‘s<em>Raisin</em>, 2016, resonates with innumerable references to blackness, including the Lorraine Hansberry play, <em>A Raisin in the Sun</em> and even the comical commercial using animated raisins circa 1990. In this work, Cyrus uses hand dyed burgundy fabrics and collages them in a tight intimate composition.</p>
<p>Of note are two video installations by black women, Tameka Norris and Nsenga Knight, which are as different in context and intent as night and day. Norris creates an absurd, laughable work that addresses stereotypes; titled <em>Purple Painting</em> (2011), Norris, her face painted purple, wantonly eats a banana with abandon while emitting animal like noises. Embedded in the background is another video screen, playing footage of Norris in a coiffed blonde wig, eating a banana with great care and poise. She plays with several tropes related to gender, sexuality, race and humor. At first take, the work is hilarious, while deeper scrutiny of the juxtaposition of the figures and their gestures reveals a layer of commentary that is biting and uncomfortable for some viewers.</p>
<figure id="attachment_65237" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-65237" style="width: 275px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/jcy-05_eroding-witness-7_b_27x16_original1-e1485908042115.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-65237"><img loading="lazy" class="size-medium wp-image-65237" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/jcy-05_eroding-witness-7_b_27x16_original1-275x379.jpg" alt="Jamal Cyrus, Eroding Witness 7_b, 2014. Laser-cut papyrus, 27 × 16 3/4 inches. Courtesy of the Artist" width="275" height="379" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-65237" class="wp-caption-text">Jamal Cyrus, Eroding Witness 7_b, 2014. Laser-cut papyrus, 27 × 16 3/4 inches. Courtesy of the Artist</figcaption></figure>
<p>Knight, in <em>X Speaks</em> (2014), takes a didactic approach to disseminating the late speeches of Malcolm X. She takes the language of the American political and cultural icon and encourages an assessment of his ideas for blacks in the 21<sup>st</sup> century, by having his speeches read by community participants, recording these events. The sessions, broadcast live across the Internet, are made accessible via technological dissemination. Is Knight, a Muslim, proselytizing or merely creating an open forum on race and oppression by using X’s seminal speeches as a point of departure? This project surfaces in the milieu of the Black Lives Matter Movement, Malcolm X’s 50th anniversary, hostility towards assimilation by African-American Muslims and the fight for social justice.</p>
<p>Knight crosses the line drawn between art and education in relationship to socio-political concerns. While many African-American artists obscure or conceptually abstract content, Knight tackles head on subjects related to Black oppression, Islam and the construct of race in America.</p>
<p>Across the board, more than sharing aesthetic commonality, the works by Adkins’s students are very diverse in format, materiality and content. “Darkwater Revival” highlights the questioning minds of the artists presented. The ultimate influence of Adkins is that those whole follow in his wake are engaged in intuitive processes, immersive research and collaboration. These artists, in pursuit of multivalent journeys, credit Adkins as their radix.</p>
<figure id="attachment_65239" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-65239" style="width: 275px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/DarkwaterRecord_TAdkins_Venice2015-1-e1485908145143.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-65239"><img loading="lazy" class="size-medium wp-image-65239" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/DarkwaterRecord_TAdkins_Venice2015-1-275x407.jpg" alt="Terry Adkins, Darkwater Record, 2002. Estate of Terry Adkins, Courtesy Salon 94" width="275" height="407" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-65239" class="wp-caption-text">Terry Adkins, Darkwater Record, 2002. Estate of Terry Adkins, Courtesy Salon 94</figcaption></figure>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2017/01/31/a-m-weaver-on-terry-adkins/">&#8220;Material Potentialities&#8221;: Terry Adkins and His Influence</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://artcritical.com/2017/01/31/a-m-weaver-on-terry-adkins/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marx, Africa and the Serene Republic: A Dispatch from Venice</title>
		<link>https://artcritical.com/2015/05/20/adrian-dannatt-on-the-venice-biennale/</link>
					<comments>https://artcritical.com/2015/05/20/adrian-dannatt-on-the-venice-biennale/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adrian Dannatt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2015 14:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Dispatches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adkins| Terry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Armenity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ghenie| Adrian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonas| Joan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marxism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misson| Alain Arias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mutu| Wangechi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pollock| Charles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pollock| Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Venice Biennale]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.artcritical.com/?p=49428</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The first of artcritical's takes this summer on the Venice Biennale</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2015/05/20/adrian-dannatt-on-the-venice-biennale/">Marx, Africa and the Serene Republic: A Dispatch from Venice</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<figure id="attachment_49458" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-49458" style="width: 550px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Armenian_Pavilion_Venice.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-49458" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Armenian_Pavilion_Venice.jpg" alt="Armenity / Haiyutioun. Contemporary artists from the Armenian Diaspora, Armenian Pavilion, 56th International Art Exhibition - la Biennale di Venezia, All the World’s Futures. Photo: Sara Sagui. Courtesy la Biennale di Venezia" width="550" height="248" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2015/05/Armenian_Pavilion_Venice.jpg 550w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2015/05/Armenian_Pavilion_Venice-275x124.jpg 275w" sizes="(max-width: 550px) 100vw, 550px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-49458" class="wp-caption-text">Armenity/Haiyutioun. Contemporary artists from the Armenian Diaspora, Armenian Pavilion, 56th International Art Exhibition — la Biennale di Venezia, All the World’s Futures. Photo: Sara Sagui. Courtesy la Biennale di Venezia</figcaption></figure>
<p>Like any Venice Biennale, this year&#8217;s is not merely a curator&#8217;s egg (good in parts, rotten in others) but a veritable battery farm of them, with more ill and excellent specimens gathered together than one might wish to contemplate, let alone summarize in a thousand words.</p>
<p>The good news is that the signature event — the main exhibition, convincingly curated by Okwui Enwezor, divided between the Padiglione Centrale, in the Giardini, and the Arsenale — is carefully structured, intellectually engaging, aesthetically rewarding and, for so vast an exhibition, unusually coherent. The bad news is that the majority of the national pavilions are pretty lousy, only a handful worth the effort or long queues. Venice is also enlivened, as always, by numerous satellite events, group exhibitions, solo shows, performances — several outstanding, many atrocious, all providing added incentive to survey La Serenissima before the fun ends in November.</p>
<figure id="attachment_49462" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-49462" style="width: 275px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Joan_Jonas_Venice.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-medium wp-image-49462" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Joan_Jonas_Venice-275x184.jpg" alt="Joan Jonas: They Come to Us Without a Word, US Pavilion. Photo: Moira Ricci. Courtesy la Biennale di Venezia" width="275" height="184" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2015/05/Joan_Jonas_Venice-275x184.jpg 275w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2015/05/Joan_Jonas_Venice.jpg 550w" sizes="(max-width: 275px) 100vw, 275px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-49462" class="wp-caption-text">Joan Jonas: They Come to Us Without a Word, US Pavilion. Photo: Moira Ricci. Courtesy la Biennale di Venezia</figcaption></figure>
<p>Enwezor&#8217;s exhibition title, ”All the World&#8217;s Futures,” sounds like the sort of waffle cobbled together by a committee and hardly suits a show more about the past than the future. Unless, that is, Enwezor meant “futures” in the financial sense, for his stated intention is to bring a Marxist analysis to bear on the current context. This “return to Marx” might be compared to Lacan&#8217;s “return to Freud,” an extension and elaboration of the franchise unrecognizable to purists. Such commitment includes a full reading of Marx&#8217;s works, every single word recited in architect David Adjaye’s central performance space, which even features a bearded lookalike dressed as the great man. The paradoxical contrast between this Marxist rhetoric and the billionaire collectors and well-heeled gallerists swarming the opening events was a source of bitter mirth to local anarchist groups who continuously heckled and attacked the proceedings, even launching physical protests against the Giardini and the Guggenheim.</p>
<p>A more engaging anarchistic intervention was the “Sinking of Venice,” performed by veteran Fluxus poet Alain Arias-Misson, who appeared on the Grand Canal in a boat towing the word &#8220;VENICE,&#8221; the giant letters inevitably sinking to the applause of enthusiastic onlookers. Throughout the main exhibition various <em>soi disant</em> Marxist figures lay out the territory, especially an older generation of radical filmmakers such as Jean-Marie Straub, Chris Marker, Chantal Ackermann, and Harun Farocki, whose works provide rigorous ideological backbone. And the extensive program of events scheduled for the performance arena, involving a dazzling range of thinkers, composers, performers, academics, show just how intelligent and sophisticated Marx&#8217;s theories remain, even if it is more about &#8220;the enchantment of the physical object&#8221; than class warfare.</p>
<figure id="attachment_49465" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-49465" style="width: 275px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/wangechi-mutu.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-medium wp-image-49465" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/wangechi-mutu-275x183.jpg" alt="Wangechi Mutu, Blue Eyes, 2008 © Wangechi Mutu and Susanne Vielmetter Los Angeles Projects " width="275" height="183" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2015/05/wangechi-mutu-275x183.jpg 275w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2015/05/wangechi-mutu.jpg 550w" sizes="(max-width: 275px) 100vw, 275px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-49465" class="wp-caption-text">Wangechi Mutu, Blue Eyes, 2008 © Wangechi Mutu and Susanne Vielmetter Los Angeles Projects</figcaption></figure>
<p>&#8220;The trouble with the internet is that there is not enough Africa in it,&#8221; Brian Eno said a decade ago, and much the same might be true about the contemporary art world. Enwezor has rightly pushed a wider African (or at least black) participation, to a perfectly judged degree. While certainly not color-blind, Enwezor has engaged with a wide range of Diaspora artists whose varied practices are far beyond the banal rhetoric of previous “identity politics.” Among all this it is interesting to see how well painting fits the agenda, with key spots given to works by the likes of Ellen Gallagher — set next to the Aboriginal abstraction of Emily Kngwarreye — Wangechi Mutu and Chris Ofili, with the Arsenale culminating in a display of new towering canvases by Georg Baselitz, a man open in his loathing for “the revolution” (including, notoriously, the sexual revolution). Yet there is no sense that these paintings and sculptures (including many works by the late lamented Terry Adkins) are in any way token, obligatory inclusions, but rather embody a new level of sophistication in the art world, exemplified by Lorna Simpson&#8217;s latest work, paintings that extend rather then refute her conceptualist origins. In a final room of the Arsenale, Chinese laborers are working throughout the Biennale to craft individual decorated bricks, for sale for 20€<sup> </sup>each, this being a work by Rirkrit Tiravanija, while next to them a paid actor reads out his book, gainfully employed by conceptual artist Dora Garcia. Adjacent to all this local art school students (half of them, revealingly, Asian) have signed up to create assembly-line monochrome paintings under the aegis of Maria Eichorn — some of which are actually quite beautiful. Global factory cultural production, minimum wage performance art thus providing a perfect Marxist dialectic for today&#8217;s pan-international economy.</p>
<p>Despite the seamless integration of painting into Enwezor&#8217;s theoretical argument, it was still shocking to see the Romanian Pavilion entirely given over to paintings and a few drawings, by just one artist, Adrian Ghenie, this most straightfoward display entirely radical today but standard practice for most of the Biennale’s history. There is no need to even mention the worst pavilions (France! Austria!) so let’s rather celebrate the few successes: the weird dark world of Fiona Hall in the Australian, the obsessive microlabor of Marco Maggi chez Uruguay, a sort of digital Gustave Doré by IC-98 at Finland&#8217;s Aalto-designed pavilion and that heady poetic hex cast by Joan Jonas on behalf of the USA. The Armenian Pavilion, titled “Armenity” was a rightful winner of the official prize, not just because this year marks the centenary of the Armenian genocide, but because the whole experience of visiting the island of San Lazzaro with its 18th-century Armenian monastery is a delight in itself. The beauty of the cloisters, buildings and historic collections are discretely, judiciously accompanied a range of current Armenian artists, and best of all there are no crowds. But in the end perhaps one outstandingly bad pavilion does warrant mention, the Italian, which is just so kitsch, as every year, that it may well be time that they had their Arsenale space taken away from them just as they previously lost their main pavilion in the Giardini.</p>
<figure id="attachment_49466" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-49466" style="width: 275px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/charles-pollock.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-medium wp-image-49466" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/charles-pollock-275x372.jpg" alt="Charles Pollock, Chapala 3, 1956. Oil and tempera on canvas, 121.9 x 91.4 cm. Peggy Guggenheim Collection, Venice" width="275" height="372" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2015/05/charles-pollock-275x372.jpg 275w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2015/05/charles-pollock.jpg 370w" sizes="(max-width: 275px) 100vw, 275px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-49466" class="wp-caption-text">Charles Pollock, Chapala 3, 1956. Oil and tempera on canvas, 121.9 x 91.4 cm. Peggy Guggenheim Collection, Venice</figcaption></figure>
<p>Within the curator’s egg principle it is hardly paradoxical that one of the best group shows and the single worst solo exhibition should both come thanks to François Pinault. At the French collector’s Dogana there is the exemplary “Slip of the Tongue,” curated by Dahn Voh, so rich in contrasts and curios, whether medieval illuminated manuscripts next to Hubert Duprat gold maggots, or actual Bellini wooden panels and a wonderful assembly of all Nancy Spero&#8217;s <em>Codex Artaud</em>. But over at Palazzo Grassi there is a stinkingly bad Martial Raysse show (even the poster is truly nasty), which undoes all the good of his recent Pompidou retrospective. Other painters are to the fore around town, not least a lovely floor of Twombly at Ca&#8217;Pesaro, (don’t miss the marvelous rare outing novocento magic realist Cagnaccio di san Pietro on the floor below, by the way) and an impeccably tight small show of recent work by Peter Doig at the low key Palazzetto Tito.</p>
<p>The issue of winners and losers, and whether one is allowed to make such judgments in the art world these days, is central to Biennale practice: after all, they give out Golden Lions, so national pavilions are in principle battling one another. The show that most perfectly sums up such cultural competition is the long overdue retrospective of Charles Pollock at the Peggy Guggenheim Collection, which grants as much visual delight as it does larger existential doubt. Here is the question: is it better to die at 44, a bald alcoholic, having enjoying five years of fame and then future immortality, or to live to 85 with a full head of magnificent hair making very nice abstractions, no money, and no reputation? It was through his older brother Charles that Jackson studied with Thomas Hart Benton, moved to New York, persisted in trying to become an artist. He owed Charles everything but wiped him clean off the map. All art students should be obliged not just to go and study the latest Biennale but also to visit the Charles Pollock exhibition and ponder its real meaning, to ask themselves exactly what they want in becoming an artist.</p>
<figure id="attachment_49471" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-49471" style="width: 275px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/adrian-ghenie.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-medium wp-image-49471" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/adrian-ghenie-275x194.jpg" alt="works by Adrian Ghenie on view at the Romanian Pavilion, Terry Adkins, Darkwater Record, 2003, on view at - la Biennale di Venezia, All the World’s Futures, 2015" width="275" height="194" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2015/05/adrian-ghenie-275x194.jpg 275w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2015/05/adrian-ghenie.jpg 550w" sizes="(max-width: 275px) 100vw, 275px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-49471" class="wp-caption-text">works by Adrian Ghenie on view at the Romanian Pavilion, Terry Adkins, Darkwater Record, 2003, on view at &#8211; la Biennale di Venezia, All the World’s Futures, 2015</figcaption></figure>
<figure id="attachment_49467" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-49467" style="width: 275px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/terry-adkins.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-medium wp-image-49467" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/terry-adkins-275x377.jpg" alt="Terry Adkins, Darkwater Record, 2003, on view at - la Biennale di Venezia, All the World’s Futures." width="275" height="377" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2015/05/terry-adkins-275x377.jpg 275w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2015/05/terry-adkins.jpg 365w" sizes="(max-width: 275px) 100vw, 275px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-49467" class="wp-caption-text">Terry Adkins, Darkwater Record, 2003, on view at &#8211; la Biennale di Venezia, All the World’s Futures.</figcaption></figure>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2015/05/20/adrian-dannatt-on-the-venice-biennale/">Marx, Africa and the Serene Republic: A Dispatch from Venice</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://artcritical.com/2015/05/20/adrian-dannatt-on-the-venice-biennale/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
