<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ampersand Gallery &#8211; artcritical</title>
	<atom:link href="https://artcritical.com/tag/ampersand-gallery/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://artcritical.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2016 04:58:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.5.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>SkyDancers and Concrete Poetry: Scott Zieher at Ampersand</title>
		<link>https://artcritical.com/2016/04/25/paul-maziar-on-scott-zieher/</link>
					<comments>https://artcritical.com/2016/04/25/paul-maziar-on-scott-zieher/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Maziar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2016 17:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Dispatches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ampersand Editions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ampersand Gallery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dispatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maziar| Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poetry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zieher| Scott]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.artcritical.com/?p=56976</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The collagist and gallerist presents "Totems &#038; Cantos" in Portland, OR.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2016/04/25/paul-maziar-on-scott-zieher/">SkyDancers and Concrete Poetry: Scott Zieher at Ampersand</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><em>Scott Zieher: Totems &amp; Cantos</em></strong><strong> at </strong><strong>Ampersand Bookshop and Gallery</strong></p>
<p>March 19 to April 24, 2016<br />
2916 NE Alberta Street, Suite B (between NE 29th and NE 30th avenues)<br />
Portland, OR, 503 805 5458</p>
<figure id="attachment_57067" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-57067" style="width: 550px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" class="wp-image-57067 size-full" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Zieher_totem3.jpg" alt="Scott Zieher, Totem #3, 2012. Collage on paper, 18 x 24 inches. Courtesy of the artist and Ampersand." width="550" height="408" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2016/04/Zieher_totem3.jpg 550w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2016/04/Zieher_totem3-275x205.jpg 275w" sizes="(max-width: 550px) 100vw, 550px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-57067" class="wp-caption-text">Scott Zieher, Totem #3, 2012. Collage on paper, 18 x 24 inches. Courtesy of the artist and Ampersand.</figcaption></figure>
<p>Long before it was fashionable to glue clippings of ziggurats (to intimate exotica) from 1970s <em>National Geographic </em>pages, juxtaposed with some modern trope or other (to suggest time-flux), collage had already enjoyed its heyday. The many cute new versions readily found online have the attractive quality of anything else torn out of time, labeled “vintage” and mixed with contemporary imagistic trappings, but like anything novel for the sake of novelty, this kind of juvenile charm wears off pretty fast.</p>
<figure id="attachment_57066" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-57066" style="width: 275px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><img loading="lazy" class="wp-image-57066 size-medium" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Zieher_totem2-275x210.jpg" alt="Scott Zieher, Totem #2, 2012. Collage on paper, 18 x 24 inches. Courtesy of the artist and Ampersand." width="275" height="210" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2016/04/Zieher_totem2-275x210.jpg 275w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2016/04/Zieher_totem2.jpg 550w" sizes="(max-width: 275px) 100vw, 275px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-57066" class="wp-caption-text">Scott Zieher, Totem #2, 2012. Collage on paper, 18 x 24 inches. Courtesy of the artist and Ampersand.</figcaption></figure>
<p>On the other hand, (there’s always another one) there’s “Totems &amp; Cantos,” on view this month at Ampersand Bookshop &amp; Gallery, featuring a selection of collage work by artist and New York gallerist Scott Zieher, created over the past five years. While wildly juxtaposed (e.g. a single glove standing in for legs), these collages aren’t composed of zany connections but diurnal, sometimes totally banal objects displaced, re-contextualized, and distorted to make for something more decorative, puzzling, strange, and often very funny. Actually, these aren’t superimpositions or replacements at all, they’re imaginary constructions. This characterizes their charm. That the figures are composed of disparate parts, giving them almost a readymade quality, makes them more convincing. But of what?</p>
<p>Marvelous robots and occult figurines wear hats made of images of what appear to be bowls, dishes, thimbles, and crucibles, hanging there (so to speak) on toothy white sheets or else found pages in frames, as if to pose their incipient questions from nevertheless mesmerizing appearances. Some of them have toothbrush and bottle bodies or some kind of marble plinth lower situation. Their compositions often appear to have been made up of parts decided on by pulling from a hat. One form, <em>Wave Pattern</em> (2015), is mostly the clipping of a colorful blue, white, and gold waveform filigree ending in a cluster of spheres (flattened, left within borders of white), while another figure in <em>Totem #2</em> (2012) is made up entirely of those famous helical stripes of a barber shop’s pole.</p>
<figure id="attachment_57065" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-57065" style="width: 275px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><img loading="lazy" class="size-medium wp-image-57065" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/zieher_rain_cone-275x332.jpg" alt="Scott Zieher, Rain Cone, 2015. Collage on found paper, 14 x 11 inches. Courtesy of the artist and Ampersand." width="275" height="332" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2016/04/zieher_rain_cone-275x332.jpg 275w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2016/04/zieher_rain_cone.jpg 414w" sizes="(max-width: 275px) 100vw, 275px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-57065" class="wp-caption-text">Scott Zieher, Rain Cone, 2015. Collage on found paper, 14 x 11 inches. Courtesy of the artist and Ampersand.</figcaption></figure>
<p>When <em>Totem #2</em>, the first in this series of 18, makes its appearance near the Ampersand entrance, its four figures stand waiting like deranged poker players and you’re <em>late </em>to the game. But there’s neither hostility nor friendliness in these visages, nothing personal or alien for that matter, and it’s partly because of this that Zieher’s pictures are so enchanting. It’s this kind of magic within the human imagination that Bertrand Russell writes about, describing a force that comes from far off carrying with it the “vastness and fearful passionless force of non-human things.” That’s what these things look like to me anyway. It’s a strange distancing relative to the so-called ordinary that causes the artifice to change a person’s perception with what amounts here to more or less simple cut-up decorations. And there’s always an odd one out. The last in the above-mentioned line of four is caught mid-sway as one of those crazed SkyDancers seen at used car dealerships, only one made of stacked electric hotplates supporting a totemic mask for a head, rather than monochrome nylon. One could posit that this work has something to say about commercial imagery, but should that be done here?</p>
<p>In addition to these dazzling figural compositions, here and there are other forms. <em>Rain Cone</em> (2015) is an ice cream with a kind of hot pink spray paint overlay, and venturing further into the exhibition is a series of multiple forms made up of fragments of type and snippets of collage, aptly called <em>Concretude</em> (2015) (alluding to the shaped language of concrete poetry). Looking long enough at Zieher’s cinematic collages, one begins to consider what that old stage conjurer Georges Méliès was doing when he assembled his magical films a century ago. Through a certain kind of lens, ordinary things (even letters and numbers, not out-and-out strange in their own right straightaway) are put together to make something happen that one didn’t at all expect. In the case of the <em>Concretude</em>s, one can scarcely make out letters at all. These compositions amount to a visual gag, turning the tables on art of the imponderable by way of common objects.</p>
<figure id="attachment_57069" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-57069" style="width: 275px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><img loading="lazy" class="size-medium wp-image-57069" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/zieher_wave_pattern-275x353.jpg" alt="Scott Zieher, Wave Pattern, 2015. Collage on found paper, 14 x 11 inches. Courtesy of the artist and Ampersand." width="275" height="353" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2016/04/zieher_wave_pattern-275x353.jpg 275w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2016/04/zieher_wave_pattern.jpg 389w" sizes="(max-width: 275px) 100vw, 275px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-57069" class="wp-caption-text">Scott Zieher, Wave Pattern, 2015. Collage on found paper, 14 x 11 inches. Courtesy of the artist and Ampersand.</figcaption></figure>
<p>After having seen the exhibition once, a few of these odd little minions paid a visit in two successive nights’ dreams, occasioning my return to them, to guess at the origins of their constituent facets and search for deeper meanings — a totally hopeless task. Seeing this exhibition a second time, Zieher’s works seem, to me at least, to be composed only to delight, taking on the characteristics of dreams. Like some of these compositions, dreams are often cold and at some remove as they occur, but are sometimes unforgettable. Archetypes may be manifested in dreams through familiar and uncanny imagery, and these collages have that same temperament, if such a term can be used for inanimate constructions. Emotions on ice.</p>
<p>Zeiher’s exquisite miniature images are X-Acto’d fragments butted up against larger parts with a scarcity of imperfection, so that when a visual hiccup does appear — such as a white border corner taking a turn to brown or black toward its furthest edge — one has to wonder if it happened by mistake at all. And if not, then are these images, in keeping with their mode of curiosity cabinet on paper, really just here to delight? This is the kind of art that necessitates no further context, history, or other anecdotal information, save for the fact of their creator’s absolute painstaking and considered rendering. This singularly interesting collection of pictures is <em>exactly</em> enough.</p>
<figure id="attachment_57068" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-57068" style="width: 275px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><img loading="lazy" class="size-medium wp-image-57068" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Zieher_totem6-275x203.jpg" alt="Scott Zieher, Totem #6, 2012. Collage on paper, 18 x 24 inches. Courtesy of the artist and Ampersand." width="275" height="203" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2016/04/Zieher_totem6-275x203.jpg 275w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2016/04/Zieher_totem6.jpg 550w" sizes="(max-width: 275px) 100vw, 275px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-57068" class="wp-caption-text">Scott Zieher, Totem #6, 2012. Collage on paper, 18 x 24 inches. Courtesy of the artist and Ampersand.</figcaption></figure>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2016/04/25/paul-maziar-on-scott-zieher/">SkyDancers and Concrete Poetry: Scott Zieher at Ampersand</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://artcritical.com/2016/04/25/paul-maziar-on-scott-zieher/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Best When He&#8217;s Messy&#8221;: Jason Brinkerhoff&#8217;s Unfinished Drawings</title>
		<link>https://artcritical.com/2015/02/16/paul-maziar-on-jason-brinkerhoff/</link>
					<comments>https://artcritical.com/2015/02/16/paul-maziar-on-jason-brinkerhoff/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Maziar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2015 16:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ampersand Editions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ampersand Gallery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brinkerhoff| Jason]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drawing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maziar| Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nude]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.artcritical.com/?p=46697</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Taking a cue from Morton Feldman&#8217;s remark that &#8220;the love of the past in art is something very different to the artist than it is to the audience,&#8221; it&#8217;s fair to assume that the audience can remain attached to their favorite masters all their lives without very much ado. For the artist, however, a fixity &#8230; <a href="https://artcritical.com/2015/02/16/paul-maziar-on-jason-brinkerhoff/">Continued</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2015/02/16/paul-maziar-on-jason-brinkerhoff/">&#8220;Best When He&#8217;s Messy&#8221;: Jason Brinkerhoff&#8217;s Unfinished Drawings</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<figure id="attachment_47009" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-47009" style="width: 389px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/UD-041.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="wp-image-47009 size-full" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/UD-041.jpg" alt="Jason Brinkerhoff, No. 41, Untitled, 2013. Graphite, colored pencil, wax pastel, and spray paint on paper, 12 15?16 × 10 inches. Courtesy of the artist and Ampersand Editions." width="389" height="500" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2015/02/UD-041.jpg 389w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2015/02/UD-041-275x353.jpg 275w" sizes="(max-width: 389px) 100vw, 389px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-47009" class="wp-caption-text">Jason Brinkerhoff, No. 41, Untitled, 2013. Graphite, colored pencil, wax pastel, and spray paint on paper, 12 15?16 × 10 inches. Courtesy of the artist and Ampersand Editions.</figcaption></figure>
<p>Taking a cue from Morton Feldman&#8217;s remark that &#8220;the love of the past in art is something very different to the artist than it is to the audience,&#8221; it&#8217;s fair to assume that the audience can remain attached to their favorite masters all their lives without very much ado. For the artist, however, a fixity upon certain figures can have unforeseen ramifications. Dictums such as this one show a (not always useful) concern over invention and replication, and demands that each new creation be also novel. One way to face this essential problem, “the anxiety of art,” to borrow Feldman&#8217;s phrase, is for the artist to put his/herself in a position to create work that is outside what they already know, so that “it speaks with its own emotion&#8221; and alternates from the tides of history. In his new publication of unfinished female nudes, <em>Unfinished Drawing (2009 &#8211; 2014)</em>, newly out from Portland Oregon&#8217;s Ampersand Editions, artist Jason Brinkerhoff’s work both pays homage to the past and speaks to the moment-to-moment creative act, crystallizing his world in a dizzying series of forms.</p>
<p>Brinkerhoff’s work also raises questions, which upon further consideration, answer themselves. What are the historical meanings hidden beneath the aspects of Brinkerhoff’s figures? Where do all these nude women come from? If Brinkerhoff begins with a subject to which his apparently wild, half-abstract, half-representational style conforms, what on earth could it be? In the past, it wasn&#8217;t so easy to find so many naked women to draw. In Brinkerhoff’s nudes, a possible schema or constraint for Brinkerhoff seems traceable to what is found within art books and visits to the Modern wing of big city museums. The viewer is handed a certain nostalgia, an ever-shared celebration of past works, in pastiched references on subjects throughout art history. But nowhere can there be found the commentary such reference might otherwise necessitate: each piece in Unfinished Drawing maintains the appellation of &#8220;Untitled.” The female nudes in Brinkerhoff&#8217;s new publication seemed, as it were, to have been lying in wait for him throughout the entire 19th and 20th centuries, to resonate with each other through the turning of pages, rearing for a seemingly eternal return with unlimited repetition when considered in a larger context.</p>
<figure id="attachment_47010" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-47010" style="width: 275px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/UD-058.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="wp-image-47010 size-medium" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/UD-058-275x378.jpg" alt="Jason Brinkerhoff, No. 58, Untitled, 2009. Graphite and oil pastel on paper, 4 3?4 × 3 1?4 inches. Courtesy of the artist and Ampersand Editions." width="275" height="378" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2015/02/UD-058-275x378.jpg 275w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2015/02/UD-058.jpg 364w" sizes="(max-width: 275px) 100vw, 275px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-47010" class="wp-caption-text">Jason Brinkerhoff, No. 58, Untitled, 2009. Graphite and oil pastel on paper, 4 3?4 × 3 1?4 inches. Courtesy of the artist and Ampersand Editions.</figcaption></figure>
<p>For the countless uncanny likenesses found in the nudes, whether explicitly or implicitly generated, neither the figures nor their famed male artists shall be named here; further attention to a fondness for past masters is simply less interesting than what&#8217;s to be gleaned from the artist’s style. And in the case of Unfinished Drawing, there is to be found a wieldy sum of sure-handed renderings of half-wrought drawings and collage beginnings, which the artist had been accumulating for years, until Ampersand proprietor Myles Haselhorst discovered them in a box during a studio visit. Flipping the page to have a look at the publication’s first reproduction, <em>No. 58,</em> <em>Untitled</em> (2009) — made using graphite, oil pastel, and acrylic on paper — one finds a pleasant if not mild introduction to what’s to follow: one demure eye, a nose, and the lips of what seems to be a woman with scribbled hair and a half-shaded face. The torn and found aspect of this piece is easily discernible. A few pages in, <em>No. 2, Untitled</em> (2010) in ink, graphite, and colored pencil, full of neon and gray scribbling and thinner dark ink lines, is unreadable in the figural sense, which offers relief from the veneer of resemblance found elsewhere.</p>
<figure id="attachment_47012" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-47012" style="width: 275px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/UD-159-recto.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="wp-image-47012 size-medium" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/UD-159-recto-275x348.jpg" alt="Jason Brinkerhoff, No. 159, ?Untitled (recto), 2010?. Graphite, colored pencil, wax pastel, acrylic, correction fluid, and ink on paper?, 14 × 11 inches. Courtesy of the artist and Ampersand Editions." width="275" height="348" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2015/02/UD-159-recto-275x348.jpg 275w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2015/02/UD-159-recto.jpg 395w" sizes="(max-width: 275px) 100vw, 275px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-47012" class="wp-caption-text">Jason Brinkerhoff, No. 159, ?Untitled (recto), 2010?. Graphite, colored pencil, wax pastel, acrylic, correction fluid, and ink on paper?, 14 × 11 inches. Courtesy of the artist and Ampersand Editions.</figcaption></figure>
<p>The following page, print <em>No. 159</em>, is abstract in a different way: this figure has no face, head, or even a neck, meaning it has been whited-out using correction fluid, as a new, much larger face and androgynous body appears to be appearing in thick black ink to its right, perhaps with tongue alack. The sense of space in this composition, still early on in the book, is formally augmented by one thin line in the background to create a third, however unstable, dimension and a never-ending wall which sets our all-body figure in hot pink underwear in a rather close-up pose. A last notable aspect of this figure is that her one hand, the right, is rendered naturalistically, which makes the other, more stump-like limb seem to dissolve before its viewer, simultaneously reminding one of those little wooden modeling figurines.</p>
<p>Another, <em>No. 41</em>, possesses a similarly prosthetic figural look, which more resembles a wooden mannequin, seated with one stump of leg pointed toward the ground and the other with foot upon the surface on which she sits. This lady appears collaged, with her arm seemingly cut from another page, and a torso of blue-and-pink stripes with a circular, patterned right breast (just one) which also looks to have been cut and pasted. There is, in this piece’s textural variation, as one finds in others from the book, a curious sense of <em>écorché</em>, which, used for anatomical painting or sculpture, gives view of the body with the skin removed in order to display the musculature of the form.</p>
<figure id="attachment_47013" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-47013" style="width: 275px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/UD-159-verso.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="wp-image-47013 size-medium" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/UD-159-verso-275x346.jpg" alt="Jason Brinkerhoff, No. 159, ?Untitled (verso), 2010?. Graphite, colored pencil, wax pastel, acrylic, correction fluid, and ink on paper?, 14 × 11 inches. Courtesy of the artist and Ampersand Editions." width="275" height="346" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2015/02/UD-159-verso-275x346.jpg 275w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2015/02/UD-159-verso.jpg 397w" sizes="(max-width: 275px) 100vw, 275px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-47013" class="wp-caption-text">Jason Brinkerhoff, No. 159, ?Untitled (verso), 2010?. Graphite, colored pencil, wax pastel, acrylic, correction fluid, and ink on paper?, 14 × 11 inches. Courtesy of the artist and Ampersand Editions.</figcaption></figure>
<p>Brinkerhoff is at his best when he’s messy, and unconcerned for representation; he possesses a remarkable ability to improvise and mix-and-match mediums, and scatter space by the use of collage and line. The carelessly brushed or “pushed” black ink lines of <em>No. 133 </em><em>Untitled</em> take the viewer’s eye away from the act of recognition (into imagination) with a willful and wavering accent, over the surface of the page, as if to then have one feel around for raised and dried clumps of paint or wet ink spots.</p>
<p>Brinkerhoff’s messiness, this flourish of disorder set to a rhythmic texture via his diverse mediums, offers a highly pleasurable experience of tactility. The unpremeditated impasto — juxtaposed with sudden, finer lines — offers surprise, and is more expressive than any of the facial expressions (which are admittedly <em>jejune</em>) of the figures he presents. Brinkerhoff’s allowing of recurrence into his creative endeavor has, as reported by Haselhorst’s keenly penned introduction to this publication, and evinced by Brinkerhoff’s hundreds of works <em>comme </em><em>ça</em>, signals the continuous production of new works. One can foresee the generation of even more possibility from further challenging constraints, and a rigorous consideration of figural properties that the images certainly raise. The cycle of female nudes <em>á la</em> the male artists of the past is closed for such talents.</p>
<p><strong>Heinrich, Will. <em>Jason Brinkerhoff: Unfinished Drawing: 2009 &#8211; 2014</em> (Portland: Ampersand Editions, 2014). Regular edition. ISBN: 9781941556078, 177 pages, $45 (Deluxe edition $850)</strong></p>
<figure id="attachment_47008" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-47008" style="width: 71px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/UD-002.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-thumbnail wp-image-47008" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/UD-002-71x71.jpg" alt="Jason Brinkerhoff, No. 2, Untitled, 2010. Ink, graphite, and colored pencil on paper, 7 × 4 15?16 inches. Courtesy of the artist and Ampersand Editions." width="71" height="71" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2015/02/UD-002-71x71.jpg 71w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2015/02/UD-002-150x150.jpg 150w" sizes="(max-width: 71px) 100vw, 71px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-47008" class="wp-caption-text">click to enlarge</figcaption></figure>
<figure id="attachment_47011" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-47011" style="width: 71px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/UD-133.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="wp-image-47011 size-thumbnail" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/UD-133-71x71.jpg" alt="Jason Brinkerhoff, No. 133?, Untitled, 2012. India ink on paper, 9 7?8 × 6 15?16 inches. Courtesy of the artist and Ampersand Editions." width="71" height="71" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2015/02/UD-133-71x71.jpg 71w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2015/02/UD-133-150x150.jpg 150w" sizes="(max-width: 71px) 100vw, 71px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-47011" class="wp-caption-text">click to enlarge</figcaption></figure>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2015/02/16/paul-maziar-on-jason-brinkerhoff/">&#8220;Best When He&#8217;s Messy&#8221;: Jason Brinkerhoff&#8217;s Unfinished Drawings</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://artcritical.com/2015/02/16/paul-maziar-on-jason-brinkerhoff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
