<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Anderson| Laurie &#8211; artcritical</title>
	<atom:link href="https://artcritical.com/tag/anderson-laurie/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://artcritical.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2018 13:31:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.5.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Non-Trip to a Non-Site: Perry Hoberman&#8217;s Suspensions</title>
		<link>https://artcritical.com/2018/03/27/david-brody-on-perry-hoberman/</link>
					<comments>https://artcritical.com/2018/03/27/david-brody-on-perry-hoberman/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Brody]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2018 16:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Exhibitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anderson| Laurie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heyward| Julia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hoberman| Perry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Postmasters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smithson| Robert]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.artcritical.com/?p=77210</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Combining virtual reality and assemblage, on view at Postmasters through March 31</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2018/03/27/david-brody-on-perry-hoberman/">Non-Trip to a Non-Site: Perry Hoberman&#8217;s Suspensions</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Perry Hoberman: <em>Suspensions</em> at Postmasters</strong></p>
<p>February 17 to March 31, 2018<br />
54 Franklin Street at Cortlandt Alley (between Broadway and Lafayette Street)<br />
New York City, postmastersart.com</p>
<figure id="attachment_77212" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-77212" style="width: 550px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/hoberman-1.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-77212"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-77212" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/hoberman-1.jpg" alt="Perry Hoberman, Suspensions, 2018. Installation view. Courtesy of the artist and Postmasters, New York" width="550" height="384" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2018/03/hoberman-1.jpg 550w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2018/03/hoberman-1-275x192.jpg 275w" sizes="(max-width: 550px) 100vw, 550px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-77212" class="wp-caption-text">Perry Hoberman, Suspensions, 2018. Installation view. Courtesy of the artist and Postmasters, New York</figcaption></figure>
<p>In Perry Hoberman’s <em>Suspensions</em>, detritus collected from an abandoned town in the California desert is assembled into bungee-corded chains hung from the Postmasters ceiling. Rather like refrigerator magnet poems, each “suspension” conforms to something bordering on syntax in its assemblage of small to medium sized objects: flattened toys and rusty cans, orphaned gears and transistors; shiny round things; jagged, plastic things. A portion of the gallery is given over to hanging, scroll-like digital prints of the same objects in silhouette. Individual chains have mordant titles like <em>Low Credit Risk</em> and <em>Pinched Nerve Jamboree</em>, and do not seem overly concerned with sculptural or taxonomic rigor. But nonchalance flips to obsessive literality when the visitor puts on one of the virtual reality headsets placed around the installation. Each suspension has been mapped and recreated in digital space, with scores of individual objects, each corresponding in shape, surface detail and location to the physical ones in the gallery. Yet the differences are striking: with the motion-sensitive headsets projecting a stereoscopic view exactly synchronous to the turning of one&#8217;s head, the viewer notices first of all that one nearby digital Suspension jiggles like a child needing to pee, while others swing slowly like porch hangings in a breeze, naturalistic gravity and bungee bounce having been modeled into the virtual dynamics. In the <em>really</em> real world of the gallery all remains decorously still, but the viewer is likely to remove the goggles again and again in order confirm the fact.</p>
<p>That is only the beginning, however, of this &#8220;non-trip to a Non-site,&#8221; to use a typically open-ended phrase of Robert Smithson&#8217;s, whose ideas about 3-D mapping, displacement, landscape as quarry, the neutral abstraction of the gallery, and much more seem pertinent to both the critical and the visionary polarities of Hoberman&#8217;s practice. With goggles back in place, the gallery walls unfold like, well, a white box. The suspensions now hang weirdly from an infinite blue sky, and a stark, barely differentiated desert panorama is available if you spin your view. The ground drops away as you look down, then piles of rock float underfoot and one fears to take a step. Projective geometry hems you in. A stereoscopic slideshow plays haphazardly behind the confabulated digital sculptures hanging in the foreground. You can walk <em>into</em> the slides, towards a recurring giant who traverses the barren landscape and explores the decaying innards of cheap, prefabricated homesteads. The giant is the artist himself, and the strange scale shift an effect endemic to 3-D VR, which fixes the viewer, unlike in cinema, at an absolute location, which in this case is the end of Hoberman&#8217;s selfie stick.</p>
<figure id="attachment_77214" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-77214" style="width: 275px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/hoberman-virtual.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-77214"><img loading="lazy" class="size-medium wp-image-77214" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/hoberman-virtual-275x178.jpg" alt="Perry Hoberman, Suspensions, 2018. Virtual Reality, still. Courtesy of the artist and Postmasters, New York" width="275" height="178" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2018/03/hoberman-virtual-275x178.jpg 275w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2018/03/hoberman-virtual.jpg 550w" sizes="(max-width: 275px) 100vw, 275px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-77214" class="wp-caption-text">Perry Hoberman, Suspensions, 2018. Virtual Reality, still. Courtesy of the artist and Postmasters, New York</figcaption></figure>
<p>Hoberman is an artist/researcher who has been on the circuit-building front lines of a wide range of simulation technologies since the 1980s. He currently teaches and leads study labs at the University of Southern California and consults on the development of VR systems with rival acronyms (AR, MxR, and MEML, et al.). But if Hoberman is an insider he is a dissident one, a skeptical historian of every dropped thread and wasted opportunity of virtual reality precursors, which in modern times can be said to date to Wheatstone’s invention of stereoscopic drawing in 1838. Hoberman has proposed recreating Daguerre’s once-legendary painted and mechanized diorama with digital technology.</p>
<p>Though clearly enraptured by sensory illusion, Hoberman is anything but an uncritical technophile. Previous works have typically programmed computers to malfunction with the banal malevolence of the corporate culture that proliferates with them. A show at Postmasters in 2003 included a digital still from an interactive home screen with a pop-up window reading, &#8220;Security forces have been alerted, and will be arriving shortly.&#8221; Users could mouse-click on three bitterly hilarious options: &#8220;Read Me My Rights,&#8221; &#8220;Call A Taxi,&#8221; or &#8220;Surrender.&#8221;</p>
<p>The hanging shards in <em>Suspensions</em> are garnered from abandoned homes that were sold cheap to military families from a nearby base that has already featured in Hoberman’s work. His recent multimedia collaboration with performance artist Julia Heyward, <em>29 SpaceTime,</em> delved into the juju of this same desert Non-site with mesmerizing paranoia.</p>
<p>One thing that is, unfortunately, missing from <em>Suspensions </em>is Hoberman’s expertise at vivisecting image and sound. He began his performance activities in the 1980s, collaborating extensively with Laurie Anderson (he was artistic director on the <em>O Superman</em> video, among others<em>), </em>but at Postmasters the only sound accompanying his piece is incidental: an audio bleed from Jillian Mayer&#8217;s adjacent installation fills the void plausibly enough with a soothing electronic score. This imposed mood softens Hoberman&#8217;s deliberate rough edges and visible seams, which are intended to show us what VR <em>can’t</em> do as much as what it can, and we may miss how the artist is cackling under his breath at an essential absurdity: after all, what is the point of painstakingly simulating garbage? Garbage, what’s more, which is already right here?</p>
<p>The viewer, contemplating the truth of the illusion, may be all the more awed by VR&#8217;s transformative potential, as Hoberman surely is. His decades-long quest for sensory engineering could only have been fueled by optimism worthy of a Quattrocento perspectivist, if not by the fevered Wagnerian dream of a totally enveloping artwork. Of course, whether in fascist or rampantly capitalist regimes, <em>gesamtkunstwerken</em> have a way of ending badly, and few dreamers understand so intimately as does Hoberman the inevitability with which visionary artistic research enables corporate bread and circuses. If dark thoughts of interactive shooting games and their full-metal VR counterparts used in mechanized wars of occupation come to mind when you put on the high tech headsets, you&#8217;re paying attention.</p>
<figure id="attachment_77215" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-77215" style="width: 550px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/hoberman-viewer.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-77215"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-77215" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/hoberman-viewer.jpg" alt="Perry Hoberman, Suspensions, 2018. Installation view with visitor preparing to wear VR goggles. Courtesy of the artist and Postmasters, New York" width="550" height="413" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2018/03/hoberman-viewer.jpg 550w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2018/03/hoberman-viewer-275x207.jpg 275w" sizes="(max-width: 550px) 100vw, 550px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-77215" class="wp-caption-text">Perry Hoberman, Suspensions, 2018. Installation view with visitor preparing to wear VR goggles. Courtesy of the artist and Postmasters, New York</figcaption></figure>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2018/03/27/david-brody-on-perry-hoberman/">Non-Trip to a Non-Site: Perry Hoberman&#8217;s Suspensions</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://artcritical.com/2018/03/27/david-brody-on-perry-hoberman/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>September 2005: Daniel Kunitz, Barbara Pollack, and Irving Sandler with moderator David Cohen</title>
		<link>https://artcritical.com/2005/09/30/review-panelseptember-2005/</link>
					<comments>https://artcritical.com/2005/09/30/review-panelseptember-2005/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[THE EDITORS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 19:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[The Review Panel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[303 Gallery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anderson| Laurie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Zwirner Gallery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dzama| Marcel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kunitz| Daniel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pearson| Bruce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pollack| Barbara]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Feldman Fine Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandler| Irving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Kelly Gallery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Williams| Sue]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://artcritical.com/?p=8778</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Laurie Anderson at Sean Kelly, Marcel Dzama at David Zwirner, Bruce Pearson at Ronald Feldman, and Sue Williams at 303</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2005/09/30/review-panelseptember-2005/">September 2005: Daniel Kunitz, Barbara Pollack, and Irving Sandler with moderator David Cohen</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>September 30, 2005 at the National Academy Museum and School of Fine Arts, New York</strong></p>
<p>[soundcloud url=&#8221;https://api.soundcloud.com/tracks/201581353&#8243; params=&#8221;color=ff5500&amp;auto_play=false&amp;hide_related=false&amp;show_comments=true&amp;show_user=true&amp;show_reposts=false&#8221; width=&#8221;100%&#8221; height=&#8221;166&#8243; iframe=&#8221;true&#8221; /]</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Daniel Kunitz, Barbara Pollack, and Irving Sandler joined David Cohen to review Laurie Anderson at Sean Kelly, Marcel Dzama at David Zwirner, Bruce Pearson at Ronald Feldman, and Sue Williams at 303.</p>
<figure id="attachment_8787" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-8787" style="width: 288px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/dzama.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-8787    " title="Marcel Dzama, Gargoyle Man, 2005, ink and watercolor on paper, 18-1/4 x 26-1/4 inches, Courtesy David Zwirner" src="https://artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/dzama.jpg" alt="Marcel Dzama, Gargoyle Man, 2005, ink and watercolor on paper, 18-1/4 x 26-1/4 inches, Courtesy David Zwirner" width="288" height="183" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2010/07/dzama.jpg 288w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2010/07/dzama-275x175.jpg 275w" sizes="(max-width: 288px) 100vw, 288px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-8787" class="wp-caption-text">Marcel Dzama, Gargoyle Man, 2005, Ink and watercolor on paper, 18-1/4 x 26-1/4 inches, Courtesy David Zwirner</figcaption></figure>
<figure id="attachment_8789" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-8789" style="width: 288px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/pearson.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-8789   " title="Bruce Pearson, An effective low-cost solution for combating mind control, 2004, oil and acrylic on Styrofoam 72 x 90 x 4 inches, Courtesy Ronald Feldman" src="https://artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/pearson.jpg" alt="Bruce Pearson, An effective low-cost solution for combating mind control, 2004, oil and acrylic on Styrofoam 72 x 90 x 4 inches, Courtesy Ronald Feldman" width="288" height="229" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-8789" class="wp-caption-text">Bruce Pearson, An effective low-cost solution for combating mind control, 2004, Oil and acrylic on styrofoam, 72 x 90 x 4 inches, Courtesy Ronald Feldman</figcaption></figure>
<figure id="attachment_8790" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-8790" style="width: 288px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/anderson.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-8790  " title="Laurie Anderson, The Waters Reglittered, 2005, DVD (still) Courtesy Sean Kelly" src="https://artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/anderson.jpg" alt="Laurie Anderson, The Waters Reglittered, 2005, DVD (still) Courtesy Sean Kelly" width="288" height="216" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2010/07/anderson.jpg 288w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2010/07/anderson-275x205.jpg 275w" sizes="(max-width: 288px) 100vw, 288px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-8790" class="wp-caption-text">Laurie Anderson, The Waters Reglittered, 2005, DVD (still) Courtesy Sean Kelly</figcaption></figure>
<figure id="attachment_8793" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-8793" style="width: 288px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/williams.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-8793   " title="Sue Williams Because We Care 2005, oil on acrylic on canvas, 72 x 84 inches, Courtesy 303" src="https://artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/williams.jpg" alt="Sue Williams Because We Care 2005, oil on acrylic on canvas, 72 x 84 inches, Courtesy 303" width="288" height="248" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-8793" class="wp-caption-text">Sue Williams, Because We Care, 2005, Oil on acrylic on canvas, 72 x 84 inches, Courtesy 303</figcaption></figure>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2005/09/30/review-panelseptember-2005/">September 2005: Daniel Kunitz, Barbara Pollack, and Irving Sandler with moderator David Cohen</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://artcritical.com/2005/09/30/review-panelseptember-2005/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
