<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Beckley| Bill &#8211; artcritical</title>
	<atom:link href="https://artcritical.com/tag/beckley-bill/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://artcritical.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 23:31:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.5.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Accidentally on Purpose: Bill Beckley at Albertz Benda</title>
		<link>https://artcritical.com/2015/10/03/david-carrier-on-bill-beckley/</link>
					<comments>https://artcritical.com/2015/10/03/david-carrier-on-bill-beckley/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Carrier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2015 04:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Exhibitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Albertz Benda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beckley| Bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carrier| David]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[installation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sculpture]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.artcritical.com/?p=51941</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The gallery presents a retrospective of the poet-artist's varied oeuvre.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2015/10/03/david-carrier-on-bill-beckley/">Accidentally on Purpose: Bill Beckley at Albertz Benda</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><em>The Accidental Poet: Bill Beckley—1968-1978</em> at Albertz Benda</strong></p>
<p>September 10 to October 3, 2015<br />
515 W 26th Street (between 10th and 11th avenues)<br />
New York, 212 244 2579</p>
<figure id="attachment_51946" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-51946" style="width: 550px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/DSC_39240.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-51946" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/DSC_39240.jpg" alt="Installation view, &quot;The Accidental Poet: Bill Beckley—1968-1978,&quot; 2015, at Albertz Benda." width="550" height="392" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2015/10/DSC_39240.jpg 550w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2015/10/DSC_39240-275x196.jpg 275w" sizes="(max-width: 550px) 100vw, 550px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-51946" class="wp-caption-text">Installation view, &#8220;The Accidental Poet: Bill Beckley—1968-1978,&#8221; 2015, at Albertz Benda.</figcaption></figure>
<p>It’s customary for galleries to display their artists’ newest works. That is understandable, for we want to see how these figures are developing; we usually leave it to museums to offer a broader historical perspective. But it can be very instructive, also, to study the origins of a now-celebrated artist. Bill Beckley started showing art in 1968, at the moment when change was in the air in New York. He was one of a group of now-legendary artists associated with the pioneering Soho Gallery at 112 Greene Street — they included Louise Bourgeois, Suzanne Harris, Gordon Matta-Clark and Dennis Oppenheim. This densely packed exhibition provides a good overview of his first decade of artmaking.</p>
<figure id="attachment_51944" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-51944" style="width: 275px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/DSC_39070.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-medium wp-image-51944" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/DSC_39070-275x230.jpg" alt="Bill Beckley, Roses Are, Violets Are, Sugar Are, 1974/2013. Cibachrome photographs, edition of 3, framed: 40.87 x 30.87 inches. Courtesy of the artist and Albertz Benda." width="275" height="230" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2015/10/DSC_39070-275x230.jpg 275w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2015/10/DSC_39070.jpg 550w" sizes="(max-width: 275px) 100vw, 275px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-51944" class="wp-caption-text">Bill Beckley, Roses Are, Violets Are, Sugar Are, 1974/2013. Cibachrome photographs, edition of 3, framed: 40.87 x 30.87 inches. Courtesy of the artist and Albertz Benda.</figcaption></figure>
<p>“The Accidental Poet” included <em>Myself as Washington </em>(1969), a photograph that anticipates Cindy Sherman’s playful studies of personal identity; and the text with photograph <em>Joke About Elephants </em>(1974), a precursor of Richard Prince’s joke paintings. There is <em>Rooster, Bed, Lying </em>(1971), a bed underneath a chicken wire cage housing the live rooster who was present at the opening. In <em>Photo Document for Song for a Chin-up</em> (1971), which was performed by a tenor at the opening, a tenor sings while doing a chin-up. Artists of the previous generation, the Pop painters and Minimalists, who came of age in the 1960s, defined the unity of their concerns by creating distinctive visual styles — a Warhol, like a Lichtenstein or a Donald Judd, is unmistakably their personal product. Early on in his career, Beckley, as a figure of the next generation, thought differently. What links these visually varied early works together is what might best be called a consciously eccentric poetic sensibility, his irony-laced fascination with unexpected sensory pleasures.</p>
<p>Beckley is interested in the relationship between the ways that words and images tell stories, as in <em>Cake Story </em>(1973), in which a photograph of a piece of cake is accompanied by a short funny story musing on the commonplace expression, “you can’t have your cake and eat it too.” And he is fascinated with juxtapositions of events in the news with his photographs and texts — <em>Mao Dead </em>(1976) is a good example, with its reproduction of a headline announcing Mao’s death; two mysterious photographs and a short story about reading a newspaper. One basic, longstanding rule governing the visual arts is that pictures and words tell stories in essentially different ways, and so should not be mixed together. This is why the comic strip, that bastard art which promiscuously mixes image and text, is generally thought a marginal art form; comics, it is said, are books for weak readers who need help from images. By bringing words into his visual art, Beckley—along with some other artists of his generation such as John Baldessari, Ed Ruscha, and Lawrence Weiner- decisively demonstrated that this traditional way of thinking was all wrong. In <em>De Kooning’s Stove </em>(1974), for example, his written account of de Kooning supplements our understanding of the accompanying picture of a red stove. And in <em>First Sexual Experience</em> (1974), the photographs play against the text, which they frame.</p>
<figure id="attachment_51943" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-51943" style="width: 275px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/DSC_39000.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-medium wp-image-51943" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/DSC_39000-275x469.jpg" alt="Bill Beckley, Paris Bistro, 1975/2014. Cibachrome photographs, ediiton of 3, 78 x 40.75 inches. Courtesy of the artist and Albertz Benda." width="275" height="469" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2015/10/DSC_39000-275x469.jpg 275w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2015/10/DSC_39000.jpg 293w" sizes="(max-width: 275px) 100vw, 275px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-51943" class="wp-caption-text">Bill Beckley, Paris Bistro, 1975/2014. Cibachrome photographs, ediiton of 3, 78 x 40.75 inches. Courtesy of the artist and Albertz Benda.</figcaption></figure>
<p>Beckley is an unusual figure — a visual artist who can write — and so it’s worth considering the meaning of the title of his exhibition. How did he find himself to be accidentally a poet? Beckley perhaps answers this question when he tells this story: in 1969: he was walking while painting lines directly onto the ground, making <em>From Sunrise to Sunset</em>, recording his work in photographs. He then imagined a more ambitious plan, painting a line across the Delaware River. Halfway across, however, the current took away his camera, and so, with no visual documentation remaining, his telling of the story became the work of art. When he got to ground on the other side, he discovered that he was at the spot of George Washington’s famous crossing of the Delaware, a scene archived in <em>Photo Album—Washington Crossing, March 10 1969 </em>(1969), which consists of a postcard showing Washington accompanied by Beckley’s written commentary. By presenting the record of how he avoided making his painting, he thus created this elusive work of art, a story that (for all I know) may be totally fictional. Near the end of the period presented in this show, the first decade of his career Beckley expelled words from his art.</p>
<p><em>Hot and Cold Faucets with Drain </em>(1975-1994) leaves just the visual narrative with the red (hot) faucet on the left and the blue (cold) one on the right, with the yellow drain in between. He discovered that images alone allow him to tell stories. Recently, however, it’s worth noting, he’s returned to writing. The story-telling impulse, so it seems, is not easy to suppress.</p>
<figure id="attachment_51945" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-51945" style="width: 275px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/DSC_39110.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-medium wp-image-51945" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/DSC_39110-275x207.jpg" alt="Bill Beckley, Silent Ping-Pong, 1971. Foam, aluminum, plywood, steel, netting; table: 38.5 x 48.5 x 26 inches, two paddles: 10.5 x 6.5 x 1.5 inches. Courtesy of the artist and Albertz Benda." width="275" height="207" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2015/10/DSC_39110-275x207.jpg 275w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2015/10/DSC_39110.jpg 550w" sizes="(max-width: 275px) 100vw, 275px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-51945" class="wp-caption-text">Bill Beckley, Silent Ping-Pong, 1971. Foam, aluminum, plywood, steel, netting; table: 38.5 x 48.5 x 26 inches, two paddles: 10.5 x 6.5 x 1.5 inches. Courtesy of the artist and Albertz Benda.</figcaption></figure>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2015/10/03/david-carrier-on-bill-beckley/">Accidentally on Purpose: Bill Beckley at Albertz Benda</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://artcritical.com/2015/10/03/david-carrier-on-bill-beckley/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Silently Still Among Us: The beauty of Bill Beckley</title>
		<link>https://artcritical.com/2010/07/04/silently-still-among-us-the-beauty-of-bill-beckley/</link>
					<comments>https://artcritical.com/2010/07/04/silently-still-among-us-the-beauty-of-bill-beckley/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Carrier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 19:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Exhibitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beckley| Bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Shafrazi Gallery]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://artcritical.com/?p=8155</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Bill Beckley at Tony Shafrazi Gallery, May 15 to July 30, 2010</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2010/07/04/silently-still-among-us-the-beauty-of-bill-beckley/">Silently Still Among Us: The beauty of Bill Beckley</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Bill Beckley at Tony Shafrazi Gallery</strong></p>
<p>May 15 to July 30, 2010<br />
544 West 26th Street<br />
New York City,  212 274 9300</p>
<p>Too often, art galleries display only a veteran artist’s most recent production. Such exhibitions block historical perspective, which is necessary when an artist has had a substantial career. By presenting a full survey of three decades of Bill Beckley’s art, this note perfect show reveals a great deal not just about his development, but also about larger changes within our art world.</p>
<figure id="attachment_8157" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-8157" style="width: 300px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/washington.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-8157 " title="Bill Beckley, Myself as Washington, 1969.  Photograph, 21 x 17 inches.  Courtesy of Tony Sharfrazi Gallery" src="https://artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/washington.jpg" alt="Bill Beckley, Myself as Washington, 1969.  Photograph, 21 x 17 inches.  Courtesy of Tony Sharfrazi Gallery" width="300" height="466" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2010/07/washington.jpg 300w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2010/07/washington-275x427.jpg 275w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-8157" class="wp-caption-text">Bill Beckley, Myself as Washington, 1969.  Photograph, 21 x 17 inches.  Courtesy of Tony Sharfrazi Gallery</figcaption></figure>
<p>Beckley became an artist when conceptual art was the newly fashionable mode in New York. His <em>Myself as Washington </em>(1969), the earliest work in the show, anticipated the role-playing photographs of Cindy Sherman.. In the 1970s he did marvelous combinations of words-and-images.  <em>Mao Dead </em>(1976) consists of a headline from the <em>New York Post </em>juxtaposed to a page of text and two cibachrome photographs, which don’t seem to be about Mao. <em>Shoulder Blade </em> (1977) offers an engaging play of eroticism as also does <em>Deirdre’s Lip </em>(1978), with a text about Deirdre set between images, which have no obvious relationship to that text. But in that decade he also did purely visual works like <em>Hot and Cold Faucets with Drain </em>(1975), a triptych with red and blue faucets set on either side of a yellow drain, shown in a close up large images.</p>
<p>In the past decade, abandoning the elliptical storytelling found in his earlier art, Beckley has made openly beautiful photographs. This was a complex, over determined change. In 2000, he was much influenced by seeing a vase of lilies outside a flower shop near his studio. He’s spoken, also, of his admiration for Barnett Newman whose “zips” appear somewhat like the flower stems in <em>Station 1 </em>and <em>Station 10 </em>(both 2001). More important in motivating this development, I suspect, were his literary interests. After editing volumes devoted to reprints of Walter Pater and John Ruskin, he produced two well-known anthologies, <em>Uncontrollable Beauty: Toward a New Aesthetics </em> (1998) and <em>Sticky Sublime </em>(2001).<em> </em>Beckley, so these books show, is an aesthete, and so not someone who could be permanently satisfied with the ironies of conceptual art. From early on he struggled to escape from the puritanical world of his childhood. But conceptual art, he discovered, was also puritanical, too concerned with denial of visual pleasure to be satisfying. Hal Foster’s famous anthology <em>The Anti-Aesthetic: Essays on Postmodern Culture</em> (1983) argued that contemporary art needed to abandon the search for harmony and wholeness traditionally associated with beauty. Beckley rejected that way of thinking. But this turn to beauty isn’t “a conversion or an avowal of faith or a dogmatic assertion,” Thomas McEveilley has rightly said. “Rather it’s just that Beckley still sees beauty: welcome or not, expected or not, there it is—silently still among us.”</p>
<figure id="attachment_8158" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-8158" style="width: 300px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/station.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-8158 " title="Bill Beckley, Station 1, 2002.  Cibachrome photograph, 81 x 44 inches.  Courtesy of Tony Sharfrazi Gallery" src="https://artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/station.jpg" alt="Bill Beckley, Station 1, 2002.  Cibachrome photograph, 81 x 44 inches.  Courtesy of Tony Sharfrazi Gallery" width="300" height="559" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2010/07/station.jpg 300w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2010/07/station-161x300.jpg 161w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-8158" class="wp-caption-text">Bill Beckley, Station 1, 2002.  Cibachrome photograph, 81 x 44 inches.  Courtesy of Tony Sharfrazi Gallery</figcaption></figure>
<p>When Beckley became a visual aesthete, making art without using words, he achieved a new directness. His flowers, <em>Warwasong 4 </em>and <em>Warwasong 10 </em>(both 2007) and the drop-dead-gorgeous abstract-looking images, <em>Vases: Ashtray 2. Don’t Smoke </em> (2010) is a good example. Imagine some old master still life artist taking up photography and doing large images of contemporary subjects and you get some picture of these extraordinary works of art. Beckley, it turns out, is a great colorist. At the very start of his career, he greatly admired the early abstract art of Brice Marden and Frank Stella. In some ways, his recent photographs have more to do with their paintings than with classical conceptual art. Starting in what was a very difficult time for an aesthete he found a way to make ravishing art.  His career thus is as strange as the fictional artists’ lives in Pater’s <em>Imaginary Portraits</em>.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2010/07/04/silently-still-among-us-the-beauty-of-bill-beckley/">Silently Still Among Us: The beauty of Bill Beckley</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://artcritical.com/2010/07/04/silently-still-among-us-the-beauty-of-bill-beckley/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
