<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Chimes |Thomas &#8211; artcritical</title>
	<atom:link href="https://artcritical.com/tag/chimes-thomas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://artcritical.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2018 20:43:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.5.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Drill Hall Delectations: The Art Show at the Armory</title>
		<link>https://artcritical.com/2018/03/02/david-cohen-on-the-art-show-at-the-park-avenue-armory/</link>
					<comments>https://artcritical.com/2018/03/02/david-cohen-on-the-art-show-at-the-park-avenue-armory/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Cohen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2018 21:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Art Fairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benglis| Lynda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bishop| James]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bochner| Mel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bonnard| Pierre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chimes |Thomas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Danese/Corey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guglielmi| Osvaldo Louis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hammond| Harmony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jill Newhouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stout| Myron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tucker|William]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Williams| William T.]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.artcritical.com/?p=76436</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Don’t wait until next week to get into fair mood. The Art Show, through Sunday</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2018/03/02/david-cohen-on-the-art-show-at-the-park-avenue-armory/">Drill Hall Delectations: The Art Show at the Armory</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p><b>Art Dealers Association of America The Art Show at the Park Avenue Armory</b></p>
<p>February 27 to March 4, 2018</p>
</div>
<div>Park Avenue at 67th Street</div>
<div>New York City, artdealers.org</div>
<div></div>
<div>Wednesday-Friday: 12 to 8pm; Saturday: 12 to 7pm; Sunday: 12 to 5pm</div>
<div></div>
<figure id="attachment_76437" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-76437" style="width: 550px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Screen-Shot-2018-03-02-at-4.05.19-PM-e1520024955522.png" rel="attachment wp-att-76437"><img loading="lazy" class="wp-image-76437 size-full" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Screen-Shot-2018-03-02-at-4.05.19-PM-e1520024955522.png" alt="Lynda Benglis at Cheim and Read" width="550" height="284" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-76437" class="wp-caption-text">Lynda Benglis at Cheim and Read</figcaption></figure>
<p>Don’t wait until next week to get into fair mood: This year, for venue scheduling reasons, The Art Show, the ADAA’s annual outing at the Park Avenue Armory, precedes the onslaught on the piers—the other Armory. And, like years past, it’s proving to be the place for aesthetic delectation.</p>
<figure id="attachment_76438" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-76438" style="width: 550px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/13-e1520025077621.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-76438"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-76438" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/13-e1520025077621.jpg" alt="Myron Stout, Untitled, 8-9-53, 1953. Black Conté pencil on paper, 8.75 x 11.75 inches. Courtesy of Washburn Gallery " width="550" height="403" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-76438" class="wp-caption-text">Myron Stout, Untitled, 8-9-53, 1953. Black Conté pencil on paper, 8.75 x 11.75 inches. Courtesy of Washburn Gallery</figcaption></figure>
<p>I simply don’t know where to begin, there are so many fabulous exhibitions packed under this drill hall, so I may as well begin at the beginning: Cheim and Read’s solo display of new sculpture by the redoubtable Lynda Benglis that greets you at the entrance. Turn left, as supermarkets have discovered most of us do, and you get a revelatory display of landscape sketches by Myron Stout at Washburn Gallery, along with one of his trademark black and white painted iconic shapes: the nervously breezy, feather-stroked perceptual landscapes done in Provincetown, Mass. in black Conté send you back to the hard-edged abstraction with renewed intensity.</p>
<figure id="attachment_76439" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-76439" style="width: 275px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/bochner.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-76439"><img loading="lazy" class="size-medium wp-image-76439" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/bochner-275x345.jpg" alt="Mel Bochner, Ultima Thule, 1983. Oil on sized canvas, 99.5 x116 inches. Courtesy of the artist and Peter Freeman, Inc., New York / Paris." width="275" height="345" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2018/03/bochner-275x345.jpg 275w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2018/03/bochner.jpg 399w" sizes="(max-width: 275px) 100vw, 275px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-76439" class="wp-caption-text">Mel Bochner, Ultima Thule, 1983. Oil on sized canvas, 99.5 x116 inches. Courtesy of the artist and Peter Freeman, Inc., New York / Paris.</figcaption></figure>
<p>Brian Washburn told me they discovered a box of these drawings when they moved downtown recently hidden in plain sight in a painting rack. A metaphor, in a way, for The Art Show experience, where in one box after another (the booths) treasures from the past reveal themselves. Just over the aisle, Peter Freeman, Inc. have Mel Bochner paintings from the early 1980s that, if you are more familiar with his word pieces, will come as a surprise: Shaped canvases bursting with geometric forms dispatched with neo-expressionist gusto. Bochner first painted these images on regular shaped canvas, the sales assistant told me, and then determined the right irregular shape from the resulting form. Their surfaces reminded me of his contemporary, Terry Winters, represented elsewhere at the fair in a group show at Matthew Marks.</p>
<p>Hirschl and Adler, nestled in the corner, are in an appropriately intimate, almost closeted space for their show, Americans 1943: Realism and Magic Realism. This marks the 75th anniversary of a show of that title at MoMA. Sunday communist Osvaldo Louis Guglielmi delivers an allegory of corruption and resistance in The American Dream, 1935, that suggests that only the settings have changed in the interim. All the same issues are in place: horny CEOs, marginalized minorities, put upon protesters and an unloved statue.</p>
<figure id="attachment_76442" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-76442" style="width: 550px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/osvaldo.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-76442"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-76442" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/osvaldo.jpg" alt=" Osvaldo Louis Guglielmi, The American Dream, 1935. Oil on Masonite, 21.5 x 30 inches. Courtesy of Hirschl &amp; Adler" width="550" height="380" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2018/03/osvaldo.jpg 550w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2018/03/osvaldo-275x190.jpg 275w" sizes="(max-width: 550px) 100vw, 550px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-76442" class="wp-caption-text">Osvaldo Louis Guglielmi, The American Dream, 1935. Oil on Masonite, 21.5 x 30 inches. Courtesy of Hirschl &amp; Adler</figcaption></figure>
<p>Speaking of minorities, African American artists feature prominently amongst stand out solo booths in this year’s fair, including some historic rediscoveries. Michael Rosenfeld Gallery celebrates the achievements of abstract painter William T. Williams, while Galerie Lelong &amp; Co showcase the lyrical gestalts of southern painter Mildred Thompson with Magnetic Fields, a series from her last decade. “Years ago, I had a dream about an event in space” she wrote in a 1992 statement. “Feeling fortunate to see this event, I stayed to look at it in detail.”</p>
<figure id="attachment_76443" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-76443" style="width: 550px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/hammond.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-76443"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-76443" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/hammond.jpg" alt="Harmony Hammond, Letting the Weather Get In, 1977. Oil and Dorland's wax on canvas, 14 x 45.5 inches. Courtesy of the artist and Alexander Gray Associates" width="550" height="220" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2018/03/hammond.jpg 550w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2018/03/hammond-275x110.jpg 275w" sizes="(max-width: 550px) 100vw, 550px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-76443" class="wp-caption-text">Harmony Hammond, Letting the Weather Get In, 1977. Oil and Dorland&#8217;s wax on canvas, 14 x 45.5 inches. Courtesy of the artist and Alexander Gray Associates</figcaption></figure>
<p>Detail is the essence of the experience of Harmony Hammond’s riveting textured grids in the Weave Paintings at Alexander Gray Associates. Not that one is seeking to survey the fair in identity categories, but another openly queer artist, Nicole Eisenman, makes play with a two-person display with Andy Warhol at Anton Kern Gallery. Their brochure quotes Andy Warhol as saying “If only one day my work could be shown in an art fair booth alongside the work of a radical lesbian”, which ambition Eisenman has obliged in a display where master and acolyte are not always easy to tell apart.</p>
<figure id="attachment_76430" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-76430" style="width: 275px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/JBI1701-e1520026279999.jpeg" rel="attachment wp-att-76430"><img loading="lazy" class="size-medium wp-image-76430" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/JBI1701-275x274.jpeg" alt="James Bishop, Untitled, 2017. Oil and colored pencil on paper, 8 x 8 inches. Courtesy of Lawrence Markey, Inc., San Antonio, Texas" width="275" height="274" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-76430" class="wp-caption-text">James Bishop, Untitled, 2017. Oil and colored pencil on paper, 8 x 8 inches. Courtesy of Lawrence Markey, Inc., San Antonio, Texas</figcaption></figure>
<p>Intensity of detail and exquisiteness in finish are also determining factors in appreciation of Lynn Herhmann Leeson’s early work at San Francisco’s Anglim Gilbert Gallery, Dotty Attie’s works at P.P.O.W. and new drawings by Amy Cutler at Leslie Tonkonow. The balance of aesthetic and mechanical precision in Thomas Chimes 1970s metal box constructions are aptly contextualized at Philadelphia’s Locks Gallery display with Alexander Calder and Joseph Cornell. But the last and abiding delectations in the final aisle were of a more rough-hewn nature: Milton Avery at Yares Art, sumptuous and fulsome collages by Biala at Pavel Zoubok, and the take home dream of this visitor, the ravishing quietude of James Bishop with San Antonio, Tx. gallerist Lawrence Markey, where color and space seem to be breathed onto the page.</p>
<p>ADDENDUM: Posted as a featured item from THE LIST on Sunday, March 4</p>
<p>So natural is the tendency of commercial galleries to hedge bets and pack their stands with variety that many art fairs have color coded sections put aside for solo spots. Not so ADAA’s The Art Show at Park Avenue Armory, now in its 30th year, which through natural selection, it would seem, affords a hearty mix of group and solo presentations. Two standout stands that eluded my round up earlier this week exemplify these respective models. Jill Newhouse, whose gallery specializes in historic works on paper as well as contemporary works in different mediums, showcased a fine selection of drawings by Pierre Bonnard along with a tightly hung, intriguingly diverse group of living artists working in the Bonnardian spirit. The six living painters – curated by Karen Wilkin – included Larry Poons, Graham Nickson and Rachel Rickert. Danese Corey, meanwhile, opted for audacious singularity in presenting just one massive eight-foot high bronze sculpture by William Tucker, Meru, 2015-2017. The intricacies and folds of Tucker’s massed modeling and the demands of this complex form to be seen, fully, in the round could detain the discerning visitor as long as the salon hung massed ranks of intimate works at other stands. It is just not quite so easy to take it home.</p>
<figure id="attachment_76444" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-76444" style="width: 275px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/chimes.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-76444"><img loading="lazy" class="size-medium wp-image-76444" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/chimes-275x344.jpg" alt="Set, 1972, mixed media construction, 17 x 13 x 1 inches. Courtesy of Locks Gallery, Philadelphia" width="275" height="344" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2018/03/chimes-275x344.jpg 275w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2018/03/chimes.jpg 400w" sizes="(max-width: 275px) 100vw, 275px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-76444" class="wp-caption-text">Set, 1972, mixed media construction, 17 x 13 x 1 inches. Courtesy of Locks Gallery, Philadelphia</figcaption></figure>
<figure id="attachment_76445" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-76445" style="width: 275px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/williams.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-76445"><img loading="lazy" class="size-medium wp-image-76445" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/williams-275x460.jpg" alt="William T. Williams, Spring Lake, 1988-2003. Acrylic on canvas, 75 x 44 inches. Courtesy of the artist and Michael Rosenfeld Gallery " width="275" height="460" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2018/03/williams-275x460.jpg 275w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2018/03/williams.jpg 299w" sizes="(max-width: 275px) 100vw, 275px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-76445" class="wp-caption-text">William T. Williams, Spring Lake, 1988-2003. Acrylic on canvas, 75 x 44 inches. Courtesy of the artist and Michael Rosenfeld Gallery</figcaption></figure>
<figure style="width: 275px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/william-tucker.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-76481"><img loading="lazy" class="size-medium wp-image-76481" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/william-tucker-275x275.jpg" alt="William Tucker" width="275" height="275" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2018/03/william-tucker-275x275.jpg 275w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2018/03/william-tucker-71x71.jpg 71w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2018/03/william-tucker-32x32.jpg 32w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2018/03/william-tucker-64x64.jpg 64w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2018/03/william-tucker-96x96.jpg 96w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2018/03/william-tucker-128x128.jpg 128w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2018/03/william-tucker-150x150.jpg 150w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2018/03/william-tucker.jpg 500w" sizes="(max-width: 275px) 100vw, 275px" /></a><figcaption class="wp-caption-text">William Tucker, Meru, 2015-2017. Cast bronze with patina, 99 x 84 x 78 inches, ed. 2/3. Courtesy of the artist and Danese Corey Gallery, New York</figcaption></figure>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2018/03/02/david-cohen-on-the-art-show-at-the-park-avenue-armory/">Drill Hall Delectations: The Art Show at the Armory</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://artcritical.com/2018/03/02/david-cohen-on-the-art-show-at-the-park-avenue-armory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Metal Boxes: A Hermetic Side of Thomas Chimes</title>
		<link>https://artcritical.com/2015/04/05/a-m-weaver-on-thomas-chimes/</link>
					<comments>https://artcritical.com/2015/04/05/a-m-weaver-on-thomas-chimes/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A.M. Weaver]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2015 23:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Exhibitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chimes |Thomas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duchamp| Marcel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Locks Gallery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weaver| A.M.]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.artcritical.com/?p=48171</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>An exhibition of atypical mid-career works was shown at Locks last year </p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2015/04/05/a-m-weaver-on-thomas-chimes/">Metal Boxes: A Hermetic Side of Thomas Chimes</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><em>Thomas Chimes: The Body in Spirals</em> at Locks Gallery</strong></p>
<p>November 7 to December 31, 2014<br />
600 Washington Square<br />
Philadelphia, 215 629 1000</p>
<figure id="attachment_48174" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-48174" style="width: 550px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/chimes-yes.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-48174" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/chimes-yes.jpg" alt="Thomas Chimes, Yes, 1965. Mixed media metal box, 13-5/8 x 16 inches. Courtesy of Locks Gallery, Philadelphia. Photo: Joseph Hu" width="550" height="462" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2015/04/chimes-yes.jpg 550w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2015/04/chimes-yes-275x231.jpg 275w" sizes="(max-width: 550px) 100vw, 550px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-48174" class="wp-caption-text">Thomas Chimes, Yes, 1965. Mixed media metal box, 13 5/8 x 16 inches. Courtesy of Locks Gallery, Philadelphia. Photo: Joseph Hu</figcaption></figure>
<p>Thomas Chimes, long heralded for grand landscape paintings and canvases laden with Greek and Christian symbols, was shown to different effect in a focused exhibition at Lock Gallery late last year of mid-career, predominantly sculptural works. Alluding to an interior world of secrets, irony and obsession, these fastidiously constructed boxes, dating from 1965 to 1973, articulate the literary impulses and ontological states that animate his better-known later works.</p>
<p>After a decade of working in New York, in the 1950s and ‘60s, in a scene still bearing the imprint of Abstract Expressionism, Chimes retreated to his hometown of Philadelphia, slowly embracing a hermetic existence. It was in 1965 that Chimes decided to abandon his explorations as a colorist and began to craft work informed by his deep love of modernist and symbolist literature, his evolving affinity for Surrealism and the enigmatic philosophies and practices of Marcel Duchamp. And yet, the work in the exhibition reveals how much he also felt the need to remain relevant in a technologically driven world. An influential lecture by Marshall McLuhan at the University of Pennsylvania impacted his shift from painting to sculpture, according to art historian Michael Taylor, as well as his deepening personal association with Antonin Artaud, Alfred Jarry, and Duchamp.</p>
<figure id="attachment_48175" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-48175" style="width: 275px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/chimes-exhibition_calculator.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-medium wp-image-48175" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/chimes-exhibition_calculator-275x220.jpg" alt="Thomas Chimes, Exhibition Calculator, 1969. Mixed media metal box, 8-1/2 x 10-1/2 inches. Courtesy of Locks Gallery, Philadelphia. Photo: Joseph Hu" width="275" height="220" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2015/04/chimes-exhibition_calculator-275x220.jpg 275w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2015/04/chimes-exhibition_calculator.jpg 550w" sizes="(max-width: 275px) 100vw, 275px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-48175" class="wp-caption-text">Thomas Chimes, Exhibition Calculator, 1969. Mixed media metal box, 8 1/2 x 10 1/2 inches. Courtesy of Locks Gallery, Philadelphia. Photo: Joseph Hu</figcaption></figure>
<p>Bouts with depression may also have encouraged him to shun the limelight of New York. He found in the confines of Philadelphia a sense of familiarity and the isolation needed to discover who he was. In doing so he was following the edict of Duchamp, who advised young artists to go underground.</p>
<p>The metal boxes are an amalgam of divergent sources: Art Deco, Pop Art and Minimalism. In some instances, they look like mechanical devices that have specific functions: too large to be hand held they nonetheless feel intimate. At the forefront of modern design directives, Chimes’s boxes infused with sexual, electronic and mathematical motifs, are evidence of his “desire for structure and structuring desire.” In tune with the “Sexual Revolution” of his time, Chimes liberally laces his imagery with female and male genitalia, incorporating an eroticized sense of play into his symbolic lexicon. In elegantly structured works like <em>Cathedra</em> (1970) and <em>Untitled</em> (1969), the viewer can get lost in the fluidity of cut and collaged aluminum forms.</p>
<p>It is curious that Chimes segued so effortlessly from painting to metal construction. <em>Yes</em> (1965), a work that marks this transition, contains vestiges of earlier painterly impulses as well as Matisse-like cutout forms, and a configuration of Artaud’s alter ego, <em>Mômo</em> as a bird, are neatly contained within a composition of rectangular and square forms. This is a work that marked Chimes’s transition to constructions. Also during this year, he was commissioned to design the jacket cover for two books by Bettina L. Knapp on the work of Artaud. It is telling that his esteem of Artaud’s life and work predated his decision to move toward making mixed media metal boxes. Possibly Chimes felt that the box form itself served as a vessel/vehicle to sort through new symbols of mysticism and playfulness that emulated Artaud’s aesthetic.</p>
<p>Some of Chimes boxes open, while many are sealed shut with cut away areas, exposing layers of different materials and markings. Engaging in Pataphysics, the anti-theoretical philosophy coined by Alfred Jarry, Chimes throws together fragments of quasi-scientific elements and mathematical diagrams into a jumble that give mere hints to their origin in meaning. Chimes orders these chaotic insignia with humor and aplomb. Works like <em>Exhibition Calculator</em> (1969) evidence an ironic tone, one that pokes fun at the art world itself.</p>
<figure id="attachment_48176" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-48176" style="width: 275px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/chimes-untitled.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-medium wp-image-48176" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/chimes-untitled-275x344.jpg" alt="Thomas Chimes, Untitled, 1965. Mixed media metal box, 18-1/2 x 13-1/2 inches. Courtesy of Locks Gallery, Philadelphia. Photo: Joseph Hu" width="275" height="344" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2015/04/chimes-untitled-275x344.jpg 275w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2015/04/chimes-untitled.jpg 400w" sizes="(max-width: 275px) 100vw, 275px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-48176" class="wp-caption-text">Thomas Chimes, Untitled, 1965. Mixed media metal box, 18 1/2 x 13 1/2 inches. Courtesy of Locks Gallery, Philadelphia. Photo: Joseph Hu</figcaption></figure>
<p>Chimes’s evolving aesthetic was certainly less than linear and not completely sequential. He appears to be driven by ideas and less by the tendency of the time to stick with a signature style. Maybe he was marking time and secretly coding his life traumas and inner secrets. This show ends with a selection of white paintings of moderate size, some of which were like palimpsests of unintelligible script. The hint of landscape behind the vast whiteness of <em>Untitled Rose Landscape</em> (1980), for instance, is indicative of the type of investigations that consumed Chimes until the end of his marriage in 1984 when he expressed his forlorn state in a poem “Winter is white/ Everything is cold/ Mutterings are distant now.”</p>
<p>In addition to landscapes, he revisits the visage of Albert Jarry, a reoccurring portrait within a whitened vapor, as well as the embossed helmeted head of Artaud. It is notable that between his construction series and white paintings from 1979 to the 1990s, Chimes spent nearly a decade devoted to his obsession with literary figures, by painting portraits of such literary illuminati as Jarry, Artaud, André Breton, James Joyce and Robert Lewis Stevenson.</p>
<p>The overarching themes in the esoteric works presented at Locks may sometimes seem to outweigh their delicate and precise execution. In spite of the rigid materials used, however, it is perhaps the appearance of fragility that Chimes intended to portray, alluding to the vulnerability of the human mind and the ephemeral quality of thoughts translated into plastic form.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2015/04/05/a-m-weaver-on-thomas-chimes/">Metal Boxes: A Hermetic Side of Thomas Chimes</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://artcritical.com/2015/04/05/a-m-weaver-on-thomas-chimes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
