<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Chisholm| Ross &#8211; artcritical</title>
	<atom:link href="https://artcritical.com/tag/chisholm-ross/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://artcritical.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 00:20:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.5.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Ross Chisholm at Marc Jancou Contemporary</title>
		<link>https://artcritical.com/2009/07/09/ross-chisholm-at-marc-jancou-contemporary/</link>
					<comments>https://artcritical.com/2009/07/09/ross-chisholm-at-marc-jancou-contemporary/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dawn-Michelle Baude]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 16:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Exhibitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chisholm| Ross]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marc Jancou Contemporary]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://testingartcritical.com/?p=473</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The background shadows throb with an almost Goya-esque expressionism. Maybe the matron is escaping into a sci-fi film. Maybe she's wandering through the forbidden recesses of memory itself.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2009/07/09/ross-chisholm-at-marc-jancou-contemporary/">Ross Chisholm at Marc Jancou Contemporary</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>June 18 to July 31<br />
Great Jones Alley (off Great Jones Street)<br />
New York City, 212 473 2100</p>
<figure id="attachment_5777" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-5777" style="width: 382px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="http://testingartcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/ross-chisholm.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-5777" title="Ross Chisholm, Irradiation 2009.  Oil on canvas, 7.87 x 5.91 inches. Images courtesy of Marc Jancou Contemporary  " src="http://testingartcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/ross-chisholm.jpg" alt="Ross Chisholm, Irradiation 2009.  Oil on canvas, 7.87 x 5.91 inches. Images courtesy of Marc Jancou Contemporary  " width="382" height="500" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2009/07/ross-chisholm.jpg 382w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2009/07/ross-chisholm-275x359.jpg 275w" sizes="(max-width: 382px) 100vw, 382px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-5777" class="wp-caption-text">Ross Chisholm, Irradiation 2009.  Oil on canvas, 7.87 x 5.91 inches. Images courtesy of Marc Jancou Contemporary  </figcaption></figure>
<p>The title of Ross Chisholm&#8217;s exhibition, &#8220;FIN,&#8221; signals “END” in French.  In this latest body of work, the artist appears to be moving away from his acclaimed series of small-format paintings featuring found images of Brits on holiday. Of the 18 canvases in the current show, only three use 20th-century vacationers shorn of their iconic snapshot landscape and repositioned amid mysterious painterly realms.</p>
<p>Is that meticulously rendered woman with handbag and sensible shoes, for example, gesturing toward the abyss of an absent landmark in <em>Under the Fading Light of the Closest Star</em>? (All the works in this article 2009.) Her hand seems to linger on light itself, while a thick blob of paint bobs above her head—part UFO, part Jackson Pollock. Her odd predicament brings an amused smile to our face, but not a laugh. The background shadows are too menacing and deep, throbbing with an almost Goya-esque expressionism. Maybe the matron is escaping into a sci-fi film. Maybe she&#8217;s wandering through the forbidden recesses of memory itself.</p>
<p>The imagery in Chisholm&#8217;s current show owes more to the august history of British portraiture and landscape than it does to mid-century images of vacationers, though his reliance on found imagery—either projected directly onto the canvas or appropriated as support—remains constant. In appropriating historical images, Chisholm is not creating a pastiche, in the way Laura Owens uses children&#8217;s illustrations, or Gilbert and George use pop British culture. Chisholm&#8217;s works do not turn on irony. The found imagery is transformed with results that are expressive and fresh.</p>
<p>In works like <em>Down the Road to the River</em>, the artist transposes a portrait of a noblewoman, the kind that might grace an Old Master, onto a readymade idyllic landscape reminiscent of Thomas Gainsborough. The woman floats, Ophelia-like, over the rustic countryside. Chisholm paints her in such a way that the woman/earth association fades out, like the folds of her dress, while the morphing pictorial superimposition releases potential imagery the way that clouds morph into recognizable forms. Is that a Buddha between her knees?</p>
<p>A tendency towards layering and superimposition is also present in a series of remarkable works that combine the sensuous detailing of the &#8220;portraits&#8221; with geometrical forms. These paintings, with their reminiscent Van Dyck-meets-Malevich moments, are nonetheless wholly Chisholm in technique and vision. The &#8220;fin&#8221; now is less French than it is dorsal. In the work that bequeathed its name to the show, the artist paints a partially translucent Old Master female on cardboard with spiky triangles along her back, while in <em>Irradiation</em>, triangular rays seem to beam out of a woman&#8217;s eyes, threatening to transform her from a proper 18th-century aristocrat into a seer from a distant planet. In some paintings, the triangles seem almost like shattered glass, as if the picture plane itself were breaking up, but the effect is not violent. Chisholm&#8217;s muted palette and mottled surface take the edge off, so the sharpness does not cut, but perhaps merely points—into the intimate corridors of a rich and astonishing imagination.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2009/07/09/ross-chisholm-at-marc-jancou-contemporary/">Ross Chisholm at Marc Jancou Contemporary</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://artcritical.com/2009/07/09/ross-chisholm-at-marc-jancou-contemporary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
