<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Demand| Thomas &#8211; artcritical</title>
	<atom:link href="https://artcritical.com/tag/demand-thomas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://artcritical.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2017 15:54:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.5.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>A Diffuse Glow: &#8220;Space Between&#8221; at the Flag Art Foundation</title>
		<link>https://artcritical.com/2015/08/12/stephen-maine-on-space-between/</link>
					<comments>https://artcritical.com/2015/08/12/stephen-maine-on-space-between/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephen Maine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2015 03:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Exhibitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benning| Sadie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DeLap| Tony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Demand| Thomas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grachos| Louis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Horn| Roni]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kelly| Ellsworth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maine| Stephen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin| Agnes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oshiro| Kaz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quaytman| R H]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roach| Stephanie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rommel| Julia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The FLAG Art Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ward| Rebecca]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.artcritical.com/?p=50769</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A lively, elegant group show, on view through August 14</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2015/08/12/stephen-maine-on-space-between/">A Diffuse Glow: &#8220;Space Between&#8221; at the Flag Art Foundation</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><em>Space Between</em> at The FLAG Art Foundation</strong></p>
<p>June 3 to August 14, 2015<br />
545 West 25th Street (between 10th and 11th avenues)<br />
New York City, 212 206 0220</p>
<figure id="attachment_50770" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-50770" style="width: 550px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/flag-delap-and-crowner.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-50770" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/flag-delap-and-crowner.jpg" alt="Installation shot, “Space Between”, Flag Art Foundation, 2015, with Sarah Crowner, Sliced Snake, 2015 (left) and Tony DeLap, Mystry Man, 1984." width="550" height="354" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2015/08/flag-delap-and-crowner.jpg 550w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2015/08/flag-delap-and-crowner-275x177.jpg 275w" sizes="(max-width: 550px) 100vw, 550px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-50770" class="wp-caption-text">Installation shot, “Space Between”, Flag Art Foundation, 2015, with Sarah Crowner, Sliced Snake, 2015 (left) and Tony DeLap, Mystry Man, 1984.</figcaption></figure>
<p>A group exhibition may be tightly focused, like a beam of light that penetrates the artfog to reveal a previously obscure order. Or it may cast a more diffuse glow, allowing the assembled works to illuminate one another, and viewers to intuit an order as they may. The latter curatorial style is just as rigorous as the former; if anything, a less programmatic exhibition requires (and rewards) heightened alertness to unexpected affinities among diverse works. Such an exhibition is the lively, elegant “Space Between,” on view through August 14 at the FLAG Art Foundation in Chelsea.</p>
<p>Curated by Louis Grachos, Executive Director of The Contemporary Austin, and FLAG Art Foundation Director Stephanie Roach, “Space Between” is ostensibly a consideration of objects in which the conventions of painting coexist with characteristics native to sculpture. This cross-generational exhibition of 33 works by 24 artists also reaches to photography to demonstrate the interplay of pictorial and physical space, exploring the fuzzy edges of this fruitfully gray area.</p>
<p>Of course, spatial ambiguity is not front-page news. Duchamp’s <em>Bride Stripped Bare </em>(1915 – 23)<em> </em>is but one illustrious 20th-century example, among many others. And then there is the ancient tradition of bas-relief, which transmutes ambient light into <em>chiaroscuro</em>. But “Space Between” doesn’t overplay this hand, as it touches also on the persistence of a certain shape-heavy, color-centric strain of abstraction and, by extension, urges viewers to think about art history in terms of continuity rather than wave upon wave of innovation, of radical newness.</p>
<figure id="attachment_50771" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-50771" style="width: 275px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/flag-oshiro.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-medium wp-image-50771" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/flag-oshiro-275x275.jpg" alt="Kaz Oshiro , Untitled Still Life, 2013. Acrylic on canvas, 101 x 93 x 20 inches. Courtesy the artist and Honor Fraser Gallery" width="275" height="275" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2015/08/flag-oshiro-275x275.jpg 275w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2015/08/flag-oshiro-71x71.jpg 71w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2015/08/flag-oshiro-150x150.jpg 150w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2015/08/flag-oshiro.jpg 500w" sizes="(max-width: 275px) 100vw, 275px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-50771" class="wp-caption-text">Kaz Oshiro , Untitled Still Life, 2013. Acrylic on canvas, 101 x 93 x 20 inches. Courtesy the artist and Honor Fraser Gallery</figcaption></figure>
<p>Three relatively recent works by Ellsworth Kelly anchor the show. The most salient of these is <em>Blue Relief Over Green</em> (2004), two oil-on-canvas monochrome rectangles joined at a right angle and measuring about seven by six feet — plus, (the all-important third dimension) the two and three-quarters inches depth of the panels’ stretchers. The seemingly minor physical displacement of the picture plane interferes with the property of color — even Kelly’s full-throated hues — to appear to advance or recede in relation to one another. The visual tension is exquisite, and sets the tone for ”Space Between.”</p>
<p>Gazing down into Roni Horn’s <em>Pink Around (B)</em> (2008), a solid glass disk 40 inches in diameter and 15 inches high, the viewer is simultaneously impressed by its mass and beguiled by the blushing delicacy of its coloration. Sadie Benning’s compact wall pieces, such as <em>Wipe, Montana Gold Banana and Ace Fluorescent Green</em> (2011), embody color quite differently: on these small, plaster-covered panels, two distinct hues occupy the same physical plane while vying for illusionistic space. Meanwhile, the title divulges the object in Thomas Demand’s photographic triptych, <em>Detail (Sportscar)</em> (2005), in which extreme cropping renders unrecognizable these sleek orange forms.</p>
<p>In this context, attention to color doesn’t necessarily imply abundant chroma. The oldest work in the show is <em>Mystry Man</em> (1984) by Tony DeLap, a seven-foot-high wall construction made of canvas over an eccentrically shaped and beveled wood stretcher and painted a precise shade of gray. Nearby is Wyatt Kahn’s <em>Untitled </em>(2014), another painting/sculpture hybrid, in which the deadpan color of raw linen contrasts with the flat panels’ animated, undulating contours.</p>
<p>There are two corner pieces in the show. <em>Untitled Still Life</em> (2013) by Kaz Oshiro is a large, cherry-red, square canvas tipped 45 degrees, its left corner bent and crumpled where it meets the adjacent wall. It seems a bit <em>reluctantly</em> sculptural. Jim Hodges contributes <em>Toward Great Becoming (orange/pink)</em> (2014), in which two mirror-tiled panels — irregular polygons — reflect each other and complete themselves. It is dazzling, and makes you giddy.</p>
<figure id="attachment_50772" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-50772" style="width: 275px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/flag-ward.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-medium wp-image-50772" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/flag-ward-275x361.jpg" alt="Rebecca Ward, clandestine, 2015. Acrylic on stitched canvas, 60 x 45 inches. Courtesy of the artist and The Flag Art Foundation." width="275" height="361" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2015/08/flag-ward-275x361.jpg 275w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2015/08/flag-ward.jpg 381w" sizes="(max-width: 275px) 100vw, 275px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-50772" class="wp-caption-text">Rebecca Ward, clandestine, 2015. Acrylic on stitched canvas, 60 x 45 inches. Courtesy of the artist and The Flag Art Foundation.</figcaption></figure>
<p>Two adjoining galleries testify to the wide influence of Agnes Martin on the work of contemporary artists. One space houses Martin’s <em>Peace and Happiness</em> (2001), a wonderful 60-inch-square canvas comprising alternating horizontal bands of azure blue and dusty white, faintly delineated in pencil. The mirage-like effect is atmospheric one moment, concrete the next. In its proximity, Rebecca Ward’s <em>clandestine</em> (2015) — a five-foot-high work in which stitched sections of canvas, painted in pearly tones, are partially deconstructed to reveal the stretcher—shares this Martin’s split personality. <em>The Sun, Chapter 1 [diagonal edge, horizontal stripe] </em>(2001), a quiet stunner by R.H. Quaytman, also reflects on its own structure; the primary motif, a diagonal band, depicts in section the plywood panel on which it is painted. The interconnectedness of visuality and materiality is borne out in other splendid works in this gallery by Julia Rommel and Svenja Deininger.</p>
<p>A second Martin, the 12-inch-square <em>Untitled #6</em> (1999), keeps company with a trippy, mirrored, space-confounding 2D work in glass, mirror and wood by Olafur Eliasson, <em>Walk Through Wall </em>(2005); a cast resin piece by Rachel Whiteread, titled <em>A.M.</em> (2011) — in homage to the Martin? — which seems to refer to a gridded windowpane; and two colored pencil drawings by Marc Grotjahn from his “butterfly” period of a decade or so ago. Rounding out the show are terrific works by Sarah Crowner, Liam Gillick, Sérgio Sister, Andreas Gursky, Blair Thurman, and Douglas Coupland (yes, the novelist).</p>
<p>In the mid-to-late 1950s, Kelly and Martin worked in a loft building on Coenties Slip in lower Manhattan. Contrary to the prevailing Abstract Expressionist autographic touch, improvisational composition and spatial flux, they concerned themselves with unbroken color and unambiguous, hard-edge shape. Decades of “isms” (and the neighborhood’s loft buildings) have fallen like dominoes since those days, but the deeper structures of contemporary art’s visual vocabulary remain intact and vital. As Robert Rauschenberg and Jasper Johns are lauded for eliding painting and sculpture in the neo-Dada 1950s, so too do the efforts of Kelly and Martin (and other Coenties Slip figures like Jack Youngerman and Charles Hinman) echo today.</p>
<figure id="attachment_50773" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-50773" style="width: 550px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/flag-horn.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-50773" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/flag-horn.jpg" alt="Installation shot, “Space Between”, Flag Art Foundation, 2015, including (foreground) Roni Horn’s Pink Around B, 2008, with works by Sadie Benning, left (red) and Sérgio Sister, right" width="550" height="347" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2015/08/flag-horn.jpg 550w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2015/08/flag-horn-275x174.jpg 275w" sizes="(max-width: 550px) 100vw, 550px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-50773" class="wp-caption-text">Installation shot, “Space Between”, Flag Art Foundation, 2015, including (foreground) Roni Horn’s Pink Around B, 2008, with works by Sadie Benning, left (red) and Sérgio Sister, right</figcaption></figure>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2015/08/12/stephen-maine-on-space-between/">A Diffuse Glow: &#8220;Space Between&#8221; at the Flag Art Foundation</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://artcritical.com/2015/08/12/stephen-maine-on-space-between/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thomas Demand at 303 Gallery and Merlin James at Sikkema Jenkins &#038; Co</title>
		<link>https://artcritical.com/2007/12/23/thomas-demand-at-303-gallery-and-merlin-james-at-sikkema-jenkins-co/</link>
					<comments>https://artcritical.com/2007/12/23/thomas-demand-at-303-gallery-and-merlin-james-at-sikkema-jenkins-co/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Cohen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 19:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Exhibitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[303 Gallery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Demand| Thomas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James| Merlin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sikkema Jenkins & Co.]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://testingartcritical.com/?p=4229</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Merlin James and Thomas Demand might seem as different as two contemporary artists can be. But a coincidence of means begs a comparison between shows of overtly contrastive mood and art-world temper. For both artists make their final images from models of their own making.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2007/12/23/thomas-demand-at-303-gallery-and-merlin-james-at-sikkema-jenkins-co/">Thomas Demand at 303 Gallery and Merlin James at Sikkema Jenkins &#038; Co</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: small;">THOMAS DEMAND: Yellowcake<br />
303 until December 22<br />
525 West 22nd Street, between 10th and 11th avenues, 212-255-1121</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: small;">MERLIN JAMES: Paintings of Buildings<br />
Sikkema Jenkins &amp; Co until January 12<br />
530 West 22nd, between 10th and 11th avenues, 212-929-2262</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<figure style="width: 350px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" title="Thomas Demand Embassy VII.a 2007 c-print on diasec, 21 x 20 inches Courtesy 303 Gallery, New York, 2007" src="https://artcritical.com/DavidCohen/SUN-2007/images/thomas-demand.jpg" alt="Thomas Demand Embassy VII.a 2007 c-print on diasec, 21 x 20 inches Courtesy 303 Gallery, New York, 2007" width="350" height="262" /><figcaption class="wp-caption-text">Thomas Demand, Embassy VII.a 2007 c-print on diasec, 21 x 20 inches Courtesy 303 Gallery, New York, 2007</figcaption></figure>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: small;">Merlin James and Thomas Demand – whose current solo shows face each other on West 22nd Street – might seem as different as two contemporary artists can be: One a poetic charmer, the other an austere, highly cerebral photo-conceptualist. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: small;">But a coincidence of means begs a comparison between shows of overtly contrastive mood and artworld temper.  For both artists make their final images  &#8212; small-scale easel paintings in acrylic in the case of Mr. James, a photographic installation in the case of Mr. Demand – from models of their own making.  And both use buildings, though neither is concerned with architecture per se. The way models play a role in the precarious interchange of perceived reality and encouraged artifice constitute a specifically contemporary attitude towards subject matter.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: small;">Mr. Demand’s installation is titled “Yellowcake” after the colloquial term for the enriched uranium used in nuclear weapons. His subject is the “Nigergate” affair that undermined a casus belli for the invasion of Iraq, when the authenticity of paperwork that was considered proof of Sadaam Hussein’s attempts to procure the minerals from Niger was brought into question and related to a robbery of stationery and seals from the embassy of Niger in Rome. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: small;">Mr. Demand’s modus operandi entails recreating physical places with paper models with considerable exactitude – though not disguising that they are indeed models. He then photographs in large format images with willfully bland, neutral, lighting. His procedure, in a way, is a pun on “documentary” as the models are made of paper, from which documents are often made. In this case, the politics of the situation adds a further spin to the artist’s habitual concern with the exchange between fact and artifice.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: small;">For Mr. Demand’s show, the 303 gallery has been painted an institutional gray, and the photographic tableau printed so that the depicted spaces are effectively life-sized. The Niger embassy is situated in a Fascist-era office building located between the Vatican and the 1930s Olympic Village. As befits a Thomas Demand project, it exudes non-descript generic modernism. The photographs, like the models and the source of inspiration, are at once elegant and austere.  Mr. Demand is clearly influenced by Bernd and Hilla Becher, the serial photographers of typologies of building structure, who taught at the Dusseldorf Academy where Mr. Demand studied sculpture. The C-print “Embassy II” (2007), for instance, mixes conceptual art’s matter-of-factness with consummate artistry in the way it crops the composition of a banister, the glimpse of hallway, and the entrance to the embassy premises. The image both services a sense of place, and, at the same time, creates a near-abstract arrangement of planes.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: small;">Other images depict the depopulated offices as they might have appeared on the day of the historically momentous robbery, with shots of the national flag hanging on the exterior balcony or in the lobby, and the disheveled desk from which the stationery was stolen. The images, however, only really start to become sinister when you know the backstory. Left to their own devices, they would simply be bland, in a cute, dinky way.</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<figure style="width: 458px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><img loading="lazy" title="Merlin James Yellow Roof 2007 acrylic on canvas, 24 x 21-3/4 inches Courtesy Sikkema Jenkins &amp; Co, New York" src="https://artcritical.com/DavidCohen/SUN-2007/images/MJ-YellowRoof.jpg" alt="Merlin James Yellow Roof 2007 acrylic on canvas, 24 x 21-3/4 inches Courtesy Sikkema Jenkins &amp; Co, New York" width="458" height="500" /><figcaption class="wp-caption-text">Merlin James, Yellow Roof 2007 acrylic on canvas, 24 x 21-3/4 inches Courtesy Sikkema Jenkins &amp; Co, New York</figcaption></figure>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: small;">Unlike the central, causal relationship between final image and constructed model in Mr. Demand’s work, the relationship of model to painting in Merlin James is incidental and occluded. In fact, the viewer might only know that some of his paintings of buildings are modeled on the artist’s own dollhouse-like constructions from the gallery poster that shows the artist alongside a table of them in his studio. But what the viewer does pick up is a marked sense of artifice within the painted image, if not the source or the artist’s perception of it.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: small;">Mr. James’s exhibition is his third in New York in the last two years: He was the subject of a retrospective overview at Sikkema Jenkins in 2005, and earlier this year the New York Studio School presented his transcriptions of old master paintings, a show (organized by this critic) which also included work dating from the outset of his career. Even the present, thematically-focused show includes old work. An evident aversion to a concentration on new work is of a piece with the artist’s refined sense of slow deliberation, and of art that feeds on different pasts – the artist’s own, the medium’s, and, in this case, the lived-in weather-worn buildings themselves.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: small;">Mr. James’s paintings are loveable in their quirkiness, but nonetheless willfully difficult: he wants to paint in bright, cheery colors, but insists on working unwieldy acrylic paint and various textured materials to get there. His palette is often muted to the point of muddiness; forms are obscured; the handwriting perfunctory. He is the kind of artist who lives his oxymorons — surfaces are painstakingly spontaneous, images are tortuously slight.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: small;">Rather like Mr. Demand, Mr. James pays attraction to generic modernism as a loaded motif. Mr. James prefers vernacular buildings over landmarks, but with a poignant attachment to them as specific places — one painting, indeed, is titled “A House in my Mother’s Hometown.” In some works, “House” (2008), for instance, a simple box-like structure denoting a modern house is filled in with childlike primary colors as if the motif is demanding a more modernist solution to the construction of the painting than in, say, the more romantic or impressionist approaches to older buildings and landscapes. It is as if Modernism itself is a subject of nostalgia.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: small;">A difference between Mr. Demand and Mr. James might come down to their individual mix of intention and temperament, but neither is a caricature of the hot romantic or the cool conceptualist.  Mr. Demand’s precise, calculated coldness has political pertinence and its own kind of poetry, while Mr. James’s warm expressivity is no less cerebral, deliberated, or concerned with what it signifies.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-small;">A version of this article first appeared in the New York Sun, December 13, 2007 under the heading &#8220;Model Agencies&#8221;</span></span></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2007/12/23/thomas-demand-at-303-gallery-and-merlin-james-at-sikkema-jenkins-co/">Thomas Demand at 303 Gallery and Merlin James at Sikkema Jenkins &#038; Co</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://artcritical.com/2007/12/23/thomas-demand-at-303-gallery-and-merlin-james-at-sikkema-jenkins-co/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
