<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Geary Contemporary &#8211; artcritical</title>
	<atom:link href="https://artcritical.com/tag/geary-contemporary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://artcritical.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Oct 2017 15:48:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.5.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Spatial Dance: Jason Stewart Color Reliefs at Geary Contemporary</title>
		<link>https://artcritical.com/2017/10/14/sarah-goffstein-on-jason-stewart/</link>
					<comments>https://artcritical.com/2017/10/14/sarah-goffstein-on-jason-stewart/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Goffstein]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Oct 2017 15:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Exhibitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geary Contemporary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kelly| Ellsworth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stewart| Jason]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[von Heyl| Charline]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.artcritical.com/?p=73188</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>solo show in the project space ends October 14</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2017/10/14/sarah-goffstein-on-jason-stewart/">Spatial Dance: Jason Stewart Color Reliefs at Geary Contemporary</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><em>Jason Stewart: Color Reliefs</em></strong><strong> at Geary Contemporary</strong></p>
<p>September 7 to October 14, 2017<br />
185 Varick Street at King Street<br />
New York City, geary.nyc/project-space</p>
<figure id="attachment_73189" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-73189" style="width: 550px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Screen-Shot-2017-10-14-at-11.33.06-AM.png" rel="attachment wp-att-73189"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-73189" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Screen-Shot-2017-10-14-at-11.33.06-AM-e1507995837689.png" alt="Jason Stewart, Untitled (Crosstown), 2017. Acrylic and goauche on canvas over panels, 32 x 32 inches. Courtesy of the artist and Geary Contemporary" width="550" height="543" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2017/10/Screen-Shot-2017-10-14-at-11.33.06-AM-e1507995837689.png 550w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2017/10/Screen-Shot-2017-10-14-at-11.33.06-AM-e1507995837689-71x71.png 71w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2017/10/Screen-Shot-2017-10-14-at-11.33.06-AM-e1507995837689-275x272.png 275w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2017/10/Screen-Shot-2017-10-14-at-11.33.06-AM-e1507995837689-32x32.png 32w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2017/10/Screen-Shot-2017-10-14-at-11.33.06-AM-e1507995837689-64x64.png 64w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2017/10/Screen-Shot-2017-10-14-at-11.33.06-AM-e1507995837689-96x96.png 96w" sizes="(max-width: 550px) 100vw, 550px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-73189" class="wp-caption-text">Jason Stewart, Untitled (Crosstown), 2017. Acrylic and goauche on canvas over panels, 32 x 32 inches. Courtesy of the artist and Geary Contemporary</figcaption></figure>
<p>Shades of red, green, and blue familiar from children’s toys of yesteryear are stoked into a playful day-glow stack of hard-edged gumdrop shapes in the painting, <em>Untitled (Eclipse) </em>(2017)<em>, </em>on view in Jason Stewart&#8217;s solo exhibition in Geary Contemporary&#8217;s project space. The paint itself is blocked slightly awkwardly in relationship to the architecture of the raised surfaces of shaped canvas structures that fit within a square format. There is no lack of sophistication here – the artist works with full intention and awareness of how every gesture matters. While puzzle-like, the flawless carpentry only serves to further the artist’s destabilizing tactics. It’s as though Stewart is creating rules with form in order to color outside of the topographic lines he so painstakingly crafts. The spatial dance enacted leaves the viewer with odd visual paradoxes to unravel.</p>
<p>In <em>Untitled (Saratoga Hot)</em> (2017) for instance, the oddly eye-like center of the painting appears to advance toward the viewer even though the powerful architecture of flat cadmium red that frames it would normally occupy the foreground in any other context. Instead, careful lighting and the raised topography of the central pale pink iris-like center are part of what keep it in check. The sharp geometry of the hunter green sclera offsetting the pink, however, thwarts a bodily reading with the kind of sharp geometry more often associated with the balsawood perfection of model airplane kits.</p>
<figure id="attachment_73190" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-73190" style="width: 275px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/james-stewart-saratoga.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-73190"><img loading="lazy" class="size-medium wp-image-73190" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/james-stewart-saratoga-275x276.jpg" alt="Jason Stewart, Untitled (Saratoga Hot), 2017. Acrylic and goauche on canvas over panels, 24 x 24 inches. Courtesy of the artist and Geary Contemporary" width="275" height="276" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2017/10/james-stewart-saratoga-275x276.jpg 275w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2017/10/james-stewart-saratoga-71x71.jpg 71w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2017/10/james-stewart-saratoga-32x32.jpg 32w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2017/10/james-stewart-saratoga-64x64.jpg 64w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2017/10/james-stewart-saratoga-96x96.jpg 96w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2017/10/james-stewart-saratoga-128x128.jpg 128w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2017/10/james-stewart-saratoga-150x150.jpg 150w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2017/10/james-stewart-saratoga.jpg 550w" sizes="(max-width: 275px) 100vw, 275px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-73190" class="wp-caption-text">Jason Stewart, Untitled (Saratoga Hot), 2017. Acrylic and goauche on canvas over panels, 24 x 24 inches. Courtesy of the artist and Geary Contemporary</figcaption></figure>
<p>One of the most startling paintings in the exhibition is <em>Untitled (Crosstown) </em>(2017). An earlier version of it glimpsed in the artist’s studio was perhaps overly tasteful in the perfect white-on-white “U”-shaped architecture that could have easily been the handiwork of an Italian design studio had Stewart not added a surprise ending: a large split black and fluorescent yellow quadrilateral band extending across most of the top of the painting. Heedless of the architecture and conventional good taste, Stewart employs the kind of yellow that usually only Charlene von Heyl can wield successfully. Under Stewart’s brush, it functions like an irreverent decal or a Joseph Albers color theory transparency exercise gone haywire.</p>
<p>Although, at first glance, the hard-edged elements in Stewart bring 1960s Ellsworth Kelly to mind, Stewart’s destabilized sensibility and almost inappropriately punchy color choices feel contemporary. His knack for continual self-invention and risk taking is  rare in a mature artist. In fact, being able to maneuver abstraction in a manner that is sophisticated and surprising is a feat for an artist of any age. Should you make the trip to Geary Contemporary in West Soho, be sure to also ask to see all Stewart’s paintings as some of the best, in my view, are tucked away in the office and backroom.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2017/10/14/sarah-goffstein-on-jason-stewart/">Spatial Dance: Jason Stewart Color Reliefs at Geary Contemporary</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://artcritical.com/2017/10/14/sarah-goffstein-on-jason-stewart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Doors of Perception: William Corwin at Geary Contemporary</title>
		<link>https://artcritical.com/2016/08/11/saul-ostrow-on-william-corwin/</link>
					<comments>https://artcritical.com/2016/08/11/saul-ostrow-on-william-corwin/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Saul Ostrow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2016 17:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Exhibitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corwin| William]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethiopia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geary Contemporary]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.artcritical.com/?p=59824</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>His exhibition, titled "Champollion", closes this week</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2016/08/11/saul-ostrow-on-william-corwin/">Doors of Perception: William Corwin at Geary Contemporary</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><em>Will Corwin: Champollion</em> at Geary Contemporary </strong></p>
<p>July 21 to August 12, 2016<br />
185 Varick Street (at King Street)<br />
New York City</p>
<figure id="attachment_59827" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-59827" style="width: 550px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/corwin-geary-2.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-59827"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-59827" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/corwin-geary-2.jpg" alt="Installation shot of the exhibition under review, Courtesy of Geary Contemporary, New York, 2016" width="550" height="378" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2016/08/corwin-geary-2.jpg 550w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2016/08/corwin-geary-2-275x189.jpg 275w" sizes="(max-width: 550px) 100vw, 550px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-59827" class="wp-caption-text">Installation shot of the exhibition under review, Courtesy of Geary Contemporary, New York, 2016</figcaption></figure>
<p>William Corwin’s chunky objects, fragmentary assemblages, and thematically installed aggregates are discursive, and recursive works. A veritable time traveler, the knowledge that fills his heterogeneous, interdisciplinary, and multicultural sculptures veer from the mystical to the mundane. His point of view is both speculative and rooted in history and Western Metaphysics. Meanwhile, his aesthetic is intentionally crude, sometimes verging on the abject.</p>
<p>On entering his current exhibition, which is titled “Champollion”, we are greeted by a single rectangular slab-like, translucent sculpture in Lucite. Illuminated by lights installed in its pedestal, the somewhat abstract, minimalist <em>Double Doors of the Horizon</em> is neither pristine, nor like so many of the other objects in the show rough-hewn—unique in its form and materiality, it duly stands on its own. The two parallel holes that pierce the upper third make it resemble a scale model of the swinging kitchen doors in a restaurant, or, perhaps, the peepholes through which one views Marcel Duchamp’s <em>Etant donnés</em>. Given its title, neither referent rings true, however. These are, instead, the doors of perception through which one passes in the quest for awareness and transcendence. What lies beyond, literally, is a large stepped display-stand, made of rough construction grade plywood. This structure, placed on the diagonal, occupies the center of the gallery. It has three tiers on one-side (facing the gallery’s door) and two in the rear. Its top surfaces, on which Corwin has installed his sculptures, are painted a bone white.</p>
<figure id="attachment_59828" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-59828" style="width: 275px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/corwin-doors.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-59828"><img loading="lazy" class="wp-image-59828 size-medium" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/corwin-doors-275x408.jpg" alt="William Corwin, Double Doors of the Horizon, 2016. Resin, 14 x 9.5 x 4 inches. Courtesy of Geary Contemporary, New York, 1916 " width="275" height="408" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2016/08/corwin-doors-275x408.jpg 275w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2016/08/corwin-doors.jpg 337w" sizes="(max-width: 275px) 100vw, 275px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-59828" class="wp-caption-text">William Corwin, Double Doors of the Horizon, 2016. Resin, 14 x 9.5 x 4 inches. Courtesy of Geary Contemporary, New York, 1916</figcaption></figure>
<p>The show’s title, “Champollion”, is references Jean-François Champollion, the French Egyptologist who deciphered the Rosetta stone. Hieroglyphs are a pictorial form of writing in which each image is a complete concept. From this we may conclude that Corwin’s objects consisting of pre-existing bits of detritus and iconic references are meant to combine to create a new category of hieroglyph. If we are to unlock Corwin’s ideographs, he seems to be telling us we must engage his works as if we were archeologists and cryptologists. In this endeavor, we are left us to our own devices, without a lexicon. The collection of objects that make up Champollion consists of small sculptures cast in lead, plaster and resin – each material exploited to a different end.</p>
<p>These objects invite categorization by format and structure. For instance, <em>Juggernaut or Rath Yattra</em> (2013), <em>Herm</em> (2013), <em>Ouroboros</em> (2014) <em>HDT (Henry David Thoreau)</em> 2013 and <em>Bathtub Madonna </em>(2013) are all cast in Hydrocal, and are monochromatic and cube-like, with each side consisting of an assemblage of images in relief<em>. Madonna,</em> (2016) <em>Lion</em> (2016) and <em>Man </em>(2016) are freestanding figures cast in different materials, whose images are somewhat deformed by the process of their production and by their roughly worked surfaces. <em>Ox, Eagle</em>, and another decapitated head (<em>St. John</em>) (all 2015), are still life-like objects with smooth surfaces and cast in lead. All of these works are relatively small, the largest being <em>Herm </em>at 17 inches tall.</p>
<p>By using parts to designate whole concepts, and things, Corwin’s sculptural hieroglyphs can be said to constitute a visual shorthand. Subsequently, in <em>Bathtub Madonna</em> he has embedded into an irregular brick structure, a bathtub Madonna — a time honored lawn ornament in working-class, catholic neighborhoods. The work is in the powdery blue color associated with the Madonna. In this manner, Corwin joins together the sacred and the profane. Reciprocally, the four castings of the single image of <em>Lion</em> raises questions about its possible referent. Ancient Abyssinian sculptures of seated lions, used as temple guardians, come to mind, and from here one may think of Haile Selassie, venerated as the Lion of Judah in the Rastafarian religion. This connection to Selassie has to do with the idea that among the differing races that descend from Noah’s son Ham’s children were the Cush from whom the Ethiopians are descended. This game of associations, and connections runs through Corwin’s works, bouncing back and forth within each piece, and between them. Corwin recently spent time in Ethiopia where he visited various biblical sites.</p>
<p>In the end, in part because of Corwin’s crude or improvised manner, I could not resist thinking of this installation as being a post-apocalyptic society’s display of objects representing its mythic history and origins. In this scenario, Corwin’s hieroglyphs are comparable to the role the book “The Wizard of Oz” plays in the movie, “Zardoz“ (1974; dir. John Boorman), or the mash up of Celtic Mythology, St. Eustace, and Punch and Judy in Russell Hoban’s novel, Riddley Walker (1980). In both cases, totally misunderstood narratives come to serve as models not only for cautionary tales, but also for the reconstruction of society. If this interpretation in any way corresponds to Corwin’s project, then central to this endeavor is an attempt, on his part, to make sense of the existential appeal of the ontological and the mythic.</p>
<figure id="attachment_59826" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-59826" style="width: 550px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/corwin-geary-3.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-59826"><img loading="lazy" class="wp-image-59826 size-full" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/corwin-geary-3.jpg" alt="Installation shot of the exhibition under review, with [L-R], William Corwin, Bathtub Madonna (2013), Ouroboros (2014), H. D. T. (Henry David Thoreau) (2013). Courtesy of Geary Contemporary, New York, 2016" width="550" height="371" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2016/08/corwin-geary-3.jpg 550w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2016/08/corwin-geary-3-275x186.jpg 275w" sizes="(max-width: 550px) 100vw, 550px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-59826" class="wp-caption-text">Installation shot of the exhibition under review, with [L-R], William Corwin, Bathtub Madonna (2013), Ouroboros (2014), H. D. T. (Henry David Thoreau) (2013). Courtesy of Geary Contemporary, New York, 2016</figcaption></figure>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2016/08/11/saul-ostrow-on-william-corwin/">Doors of Perception: William Corwin at Geary Contemporary</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://artcritical.com/2016/08/11/saul-ostrow-on-william-corwin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
