<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Josee Bienvenu &#8211; artcritical</title>
	<atom:link href="https://artcritical.com/tag/josee-bienvenu/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://artcritical.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2017 20:13:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.5.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Wired for Sound: Julianne Swartz at Josée Bienvenu</title>
		<link>https://artcritical.com/2017/12/30/marjorie-welish-on-juliana-swartz/</link>
					<comments>https://artcritical.com/2017/12/30/marjorie-welish-on-juliana-swartz/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marjorie Welish]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2017 20:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Josee Bienvenu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Swartz| Julianne]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.artcritical.com/?p=74604</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Exhibition on view in Chelsea through January 13</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2017/12/30/marjorie-welish-on-juliana-swartz/">Wired for Sound: Julianne Swartz at Josée Bienvenu</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><em>Julianne Swartz: Void Weaves, Bone Scores</em> at Josee Bienvenu Gallery</strong></p>
<p>November 14, 2017 to January 13, 2018<br />
529 West 20th Street, between 10th &amp; 11th avenues<br />
New York City, .joseebienvenugallery.com</p>
<figure id="attachment_74605" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-74605" style="width: 550px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/afe64a577b2b4c5875a4723a26357359-e1514664179729.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-74605"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-74605" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/afe64a577b2b4c5875a4723a26357359-e1514664179729.jpg" alt="Installation shot of the exhibition under review, courtesy of Josée Bienvenu Gallery" width="550" height="367" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-74605" class="wp-caption-text">Installation shot of the exhibition under review, courtesy of Josée Bienvenu Gallery</figcaption></figure>
<p>With hanging nets so fine that seeing the wiring requires an intimate stance merely inches away, Juliana Swartz’s <em>Void Waves and Bone Scores</em> induces<strong> </strong>a close attention unusual for viewing full-sized sculpture. From there, the hand-made construction is interesting enough to induce even closer viewing: irregularities, slight in some works, approximately chaotic in others, make a point of their structural sophistication.</p>
<p>Just when this display of refined works seems merely exquisite, audible spasms and knocks change the nature of the lyricism completely.</p>
<p>Emitted from these complicated nets are sounds not corresponding to their refined visual nature. Then, too, abruptly violent visible movements manifest a similarly disjunctive state of affairs between the sculptural matter and the expressive manner.</p>
<figure id="attachment_74606" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-74606" style="width: 275px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/void-weave-tremor-2-e1514664233390.jpeg" rel="attachment wp-att-74606"><img loading="lazy" class="size-medium wp-image-74606" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/void-weave-tremor-2-275x411.jpeg" alt="Julianne Swartz, Void Weave (tremor), 2017. Enameled copper wire, magnet, wood, electronics, 50 x 5 x 7 inches. Courtesy of the artist and Josée Bienvenu Gallery" width="275" height="411" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-74606" class="wp-caption-text">Julianne Swartz, Void Weave (tremor), 2017. Enameled copper wire, magnet, wood, electronics, 50 x 5 x 7 inches. Courtesy of the artist and Josée Bienvenu Gallery</figcaption></figure>
<p><em>Void Waves and Bone Scores</em> exists in the slipstream of sound sculpture by now well established, going back generationally, in a genealogical tree which includes not only Cagean capture of ambient sounds but also programmed machine noise as heard through <em>musique concrète</em>, and many avatars of Paul Klee’s <em>Twittering Machine</em>. So, in a certain way, Swartz has been the beneficiary of more radically innovative art prior to her own. But she has also brought the sound scores up-to-date, in digital recording of sounds from her life world. Here is her playlist for <em>Bone Score (Tangle)</em>, 2016:  sounds of breathing, a Geiger counter, fireworks, electrical current, a windy night, a flock of birds.  For <em>Bone Score (drum</em>), 2016, a constructed concatenation of materials of which include unglazed porcelain, stainless steel, magnetic wire, magnets, abaca paper, and wood, the sounds entail breathing, swallowing, metal flexing, an MRI, rain on a metal roof, a Beatles song, a heart beating, and a man’s last breaths on an oxygen machine. But these sound sources are not identifiable as such, having been digitally manipulated.</p>
<p>Within speakers, copper wire coiled around a magnet issues vibrations that, in turn, transmit along and throughout Swartz’s wire sculptures, generating sound. But this is not program music, as the sounds captured do not mimic actuality, they are actuality itself. The sound samples, having been slowed or otherwise manipulated to the brink of abstraction, morph in passage in order to discourage literal identification: Hence the slight uncanniness in the sculptural presence. Fortunately, none of this is obvious or pedantic, owing to the timing for infrequent, not incessant, playing. Also, not all the wire sculptures are  wired for sound.</p>
<p>What does emerge is a tactful and well-executed cluster of sculptural forms objectively programmed to be expressive of subjective states of affairs, as if inhabited by a very irritable Arachne. The intermittent perturbations in movement and sound are dissonant with respect to the loveliness of the visual elements as initially encountered. The pieces contribute a dissonant note also to Swartz’s practice of the art of well-being, informed through Eastern meditation, to render being somewhat more complicated and interesting in its embodied world.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2017/12/30/marjorie-welish-on-juliana-swartz/">Wired for Sound: Julianne Swartz at Josée Bienvenu</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://artcritical.com/2017/12/30/marjorie-welish-on-juliana-swartz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>May 2007: Andrea K. Scott and Katy Siegel with moderator David Cohen</title>
		<link>https://artcritical.com/2007/05/11/review-panel-may-2007/</link>
					<comments>https://artcritical.com/2007/05/11/review-panel-may-2007/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[THE EDITORS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 13:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[The Review Panel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Butterly| Kathy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawkinson| Tim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Josee Bienvenu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mathew Marks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nyehaus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pace Gallery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Schutz| Dana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott| Andrea K.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Siegel| Katy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Swartz| Julianne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tibor de Nagy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warren| Rebecca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zach Feuer Gallery]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://artcritical.com/?p=9705</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Kathy Butterly at Tibor de Nagy, Tim Hawkinson at PaceWildenstein and Nyehaus, Julianne Swartz at Josee Bienvenu, Dana Schutz at Zach Feuer, and Rebecca Warren at Matthew Marks</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2007/05/11/review-panel-may-2007/">May 2007: Andrea K. Scott and Katy Siegel with moderator David Cohen</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>May 11, 2007 at the National Academy Museum and School of Fine Arts, New York</strong></p>
<p>[soundcloud url=&#8221;https://api.soundcloud.com/tracks/201583163&#8243; params=&#8221;color=ff5500&amp;auto_play=false&amp;hide_related=false&amp;show_comments=true&amp;show_user=true&amp;show_reposts=false&#8221; width=&#8221;100%&#8221; height=&#8221;166&#8243; iframe=&#8221;true&#8221; /]</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Andrea K. Scott and Katy Siegel joined David Cohen to discuss Kathy Butterly at Tibor de Nagy, Tim Hawkinson at PaceWildenstein and Nyehaus, Julianne Swartz at Josee Bienvenu, Dana Schutz at Zach Feuer, and Rebecca Warren at Matthew Marks.</p>
<figure id="attachment_9711" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-9711" style="width: 258px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://artcritical.com/2007/05/11/review-panel-may-2007/k-butterly/" rel="attachment wp-att-9711"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-9711 " title="Kathy Butterly, Between a Rock and a Soft Place, 2006-2007, Porcelain, earthenware and glaze, 6-1/2 x 6-1/2 x 5-3/4 inches" src="https://artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/K.Butterly.jpg" alt="Kathy Butterly, Between a Rock and a Soft Place, 2006-2007, Porcelain, earthenware and glaze, 6-1/2 x 6-1/2 x 5-3/4 inches" width="258" height="320" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-9711" class="wp-caption-text">Kathy Butterly, Between a Rock and a Soft Place, 2006-2007, Porcelain, earthenware and glaze, 6-1/2 x 6-1/2 x 5-3/4 Inches</figcaption></figure>
<figure id="attachment_9712" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-9712" style="width: 288px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://artcritical.com/2007/05/11/review-panel-may-2007/r-warren/" rel="attachment wp-att-9712"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-9712 " title="Rebecca Warren, M.D., 2007, Reinforced clay, twig, MDF, wheels, 65-3/4 x 31-1/8 x 32-5/8 inches" src="https://artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/R.Warren.jpg" alt="Rebecca Warren, M.D., 2007, Reinforced clay, twig, MDF, wheels, 65-3/4 x 31-1/8 x 32-5/8 inches" width="288" height="432" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2010/08/R.Warren.jpg 288w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2010/08/R.Warren-200x300.jpg 200w" sizes="(max-width: 288px) 100vw, 288px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-9712" class="wp-caption-text">Rebecca Warren, M.D., 2007, Reinforced clay, twig, MDF, wheels, 65-3/4 x 31-1/8 x 32-5/8 Inches</figcaption></figure>
<figure id="attachment_9713" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-9713" style="width: 500px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://artcritical.com/2007/05/11/review-panel-may-2007/j-swartz2/" rel="attachment wp-att-9713"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-9713" title="Julianne Swartz, Garden of Infinite Hearts, 2007, Cement, steel wire, clock movement, found objects, wire, acetate, 71 x 40 x 14 Inches" src="https://artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/J.Swartz2.jpg" alt="Julianne Swartz, Garden of Infinite Hearts, 2007, Cement, steel wire, clock movement, found objects, wire, acetate, 71 x 40 x 14 Inches" width="500" height="375" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2010/08/J.Swartz2.jpg 500w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2010/08/J.Swartz2-300x225.jpg 300w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2010/08/J.Swartz2-275x205.jpg 275w" sizes="(max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-9713" class="wp-caption-text">Julianne Swartz, Garden of Infinite Hearts, 2007, Cement, steel wire, clock movement, found objects, wire, acetate, 71 x 40 x 14 Inches</figcaption></figure>
<figure id="attachment_9716" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-9716" style="width: 510px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://artcritical.com/2007/05/11/review-panel-may-2007/t-hawkinson/" rel="attachment wp-att-9716"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-9716" title="Installation shot, Tim Hawkinson, Scout, 2006-2007, Cardboard, box strapping and urethane foam, 72 x 100 x 58 inches; and, Veil, 2006, Photo collage and urethane foam on panel, 81 x 144 Inches" src="https://artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/T.Hawkinson.jpg" alt="Installation shot, Tim Hawkinson, Scout, 2006-2007, Cardboard, box strapping and urethane foam, 72 x 100 x 58 inches; and, Veil, 2006, Photo collage and urethane foam on panel, 81 x 144 Inches" width="510" height="299" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2010/08/T.Hawkinson.jpg 510w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2010/08/T.Hawkinson-300x175.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 510px) 100vw, 510px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-9716" class="wp-caption-text">Installation shot, Tim Hawkinson, Scout, 2006-2007, Cardboard, box strapping and urethane foam, 72 x 100 x 58 inches; and, Veil, 2006, Photo collage and urethane foam on panel, 81 x 144 Inches</figcaption></figure>
<figure id="attachment_9718" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-9718" style="width: 437px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://artcritical.com/2007/05/11/review-panel-may-2007/d-schutz/" rel="attachment wp-att-9718"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-9718" title="Dana Schutz, Abstract Model, 2007, Oil on canvas, velvet, 25 x 22 Inches" src="https://artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/D.Schutz.jpg" alt="Dana Schutz, Abstract Model, 2007, Oil on canvas, velvet, 25 x 22 Inches" width="437" height="500" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2010/08/D.Schutz.jpg 437w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2010/08/D.Schutz-262x300.jpg 262w" sizes="(max-width: 437px) 100vw, 437px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-9718" class="wp-caption-text">Dana Schutz, Abstract Model, 2007, Oil on canvas, velvet, 25 x 22 Inches</figcaption></figure>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2007/05/11/review-panel-may-2007/">May 2007: Andrea K. Scott and Katy Siegel with moderator David Cohen</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://artcritical.com/2007/05/11/review-panel-may-2007/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
