<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Kensington Gardens &#8211; artcritical</title>
	<atom:link href="https://artcritical.com/tag/kensington-gardens/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://artcritical.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 21:17:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.5.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Rachel Whiteread</title>
		<link>https://artcritical.com/2001/07/01/rachel-whiteread/</link>
					<comments>https://artcritical.com/2001/07/01/rachel-whiteread/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Cohen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2001 17:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Exhibitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kensington Gardens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whiteread| Rachel]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://testingartcritical.com/?p=2653</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Serpentine Gallery Kensington Gardens London SW1 June 20- August 5, 2001, 10-6 daily, Free There is a tendency for international art stars, especially those with &#8220;signature&#8221; styles, to risk in large scale works the predictable and monotonous, but to surprise the viewer, pleasantly, with smaller pieces. The handmade, the throw-off, the experimental, tantalize with the &#8230; <a href="https://artcritical.com/2001/07/01/rachel-whiteread/">Continued</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2001/07/01/rachel-whiteread/">Rachel Whiteread</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Serpentine Gallery </strong><br />
Kensington Gardens<br />
London SW1<br />
<span style="font-family: 'Lucida Sans Unicode';">June 20- August 5, 2001, 10-6 daily, Free</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'Lucida Sans Unicode';"> </span></p>
<figure style="width: 114px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" title="Untitled (Upstairs) 2000-01 Photo Mike Bruce" src="https://artcritical.com/blurbs/stairs.jpg" alt="Untitled (Upstairs) 2000-01 Photo Mike Bruce" width="114" height="144" /><figcaption class="wp-caption-text">Untitled (Upstairs) 2000-01 Photo Mike Bruce</figcaption></figure>
<p><span style="font-family: 'Lucida Sans Unicode';"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-small;">There is a tendency for international art stars, especially those with &#8220;signature&#8221; styles, to risk in large scale works the predictable and monotonous, but to surprise the viewer, pleasantly, with smaller pieces. The handmade, the throw-off, the experimental, tantalize with the possibilities of change and growth. Even the act of variation on a familiar theme casts unexpected emphasis on facture, say, if the &#8220;usual&#8221; is conceptual rather than </span>f<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-small;">ormal in emphasis. Rachel Whiteread, interestingly, bucks the trend, at least on the evidence of her current Serpentine Gallery show, her first solo show in a public London space, incidentally, and surprisingly, since her Chisenhale Gallery show in the early 1990s. The smaller works are much of a Whiteread muchness, the Bruce Nauman rip-off casting of the underside of a table and chair in her favored &#8220;wine gum&#8221; resin, a limp wax mattress looking like nothing so much as yesterday&#8217;s fried polenta. But the show is redeemed by its largest item, in the central gallery, Untitled (Upstairs) 2000-1, a mammoth, thought-provoking, deeply resonant work rich in formal and technical intrigue. If just one work, a small piece, was a winner, you&#8217;d think it a fluke, but when it&#8217;s the most ambitious effort that pays out an aesthetic dividend, that&#8217;s a big deal.</span></span></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2001/07/01/rachel-whiteread/">Rachel Whiteread</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://artcritical.com/2001/07/01/rachel-whiteread/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
