<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Larsen| Mernet &#8211; artcritical</title>
	<atom:link href="https://artcritical.com/tag/larsen-mernet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://artcritical.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2017 07:53:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.5.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>All Our Blurbs from Art Fair Week, March 2017</title>
		<link>https://artcritical.com/2017/03/09/blurbs-art-fair-week-march-2017/</link>
					<comments>https://artcritical.com/2017/03/09/blurbs-art-fair-week-march-2017/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[THE EDITORS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2017 07:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Art Fairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bartos| Elena]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dorland| Chris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goodman| Brenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardinger| Ruth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kincheloe| Megan Liu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Larsen| Mernet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Løffler| Ervin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metz| Landon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pinder| Jefferson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Studio Zurcher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tompkins| Betty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trosch| Thomas]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.artcritical.com?p=66541&#038;preview_id=66541</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Capsule reviews by David Cohen and Roman Kalinovski from the commercial front lines </p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2017/03/09/blurbs-art-fair-week-march-2017/">All Our Blurbs from Art Fair Week, March 2017</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Monday, February 27: Salon Zürcher at Zurcher Gallery, 33 Bleecker Street</strong></p>
<figure id="attachment_66113" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-66113" style="width: 550px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/unnamed.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-66113"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-66113" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/unnamed-e1489043928821.jpg" alt="Installation shot, Zurcher Salon, featuring Inna Art Space of Hangzhou, China" width="550" height="413" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-66113" class="wp-caption-text">Installation shot, Zurcher Salon, featuring Inna Art Space of Hangzhou, China</figcaption></figure>
<p>Salon Zürcher is to fair weeks what New Hampshire is to primary elections. Armory Week 2017 kicks off Monday with the 16th edition of this boutique fair, an early bird special that hands the keys to Zürcher’s Bleecker Street premises to six galleries from Paris, Brussels, Oslo, Provincetown (MA) and Hangzhou, China, whose Inna Art Space’s booth is pictured here.</p>
<p><strong>Tuesday, February 28: Moving Image New York at <a href="http://www.icontact-archive.com/I0k5-GqgMSl17qCxO51T9Rpm5yrqlxG_?w=3">The Tunnel</a>, 269 11th Avenue</strong></p>
<figure id="attachment_66544" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-66544" style="width: 550px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/unnamed-1-e1488308870914.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-66544"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-66544" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/unnamed-1-e1488308870914.jpg" alt="Jefferson Pinder’s Afro-Cosmonaut/Alien (White Noise" width="550" height="458" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-66544" class="wp-caption-text">Jefferson Pinder’s Afro-Cosmonaut/Alien (White Noise)</figcaption></figure>
<p>Jefferson Pinder’s Afro-Cosmonaut/Alien (White Noise) is, according to his gallery, Curator’s Office of Bathesda, Md., “an escapist video narrative that ends in destruction when the protagonist plummets back to Earth after a mystical space journey. Like the doomed Icarus of Ancient Greek myth, the epic fall comes after reaching a brilliant zenith that is both mesmerizing and lethal. This white-faced Butoh-inspired performance is a crude metaphor of the civil rights legacy. Taking cues from experimental films, Pinder plants himself within the work, asking the viewers to watch the images of propulsion and power.”</p>
<p><strong>Wednesday, March 1: Spring/Break Art Show, 4 Times Square</strong></p>
<figure id="attachment_66221" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-66221" style="width: 384px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Kincheloe_Dice.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-66221"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-66221" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Kincheloe_Dice.jpg" alt="Megan Liu Kincheloe, Dice, 2017" width="384" height="500" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2017/02/Kincheloe_Dice.jpg 384w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2017/02/Kincheloe_Dice-275x358.jpg 275w" sizes="(max-width: 384px) 100vw, 384px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-66221" class="wp-caption-text">Megan Liu Kincheloe, Dice, 2017</figcaption></figure>
<p>Spring/Break was the most anarchic and exuberant of the fairs back in the days when it was staged in the old USPS administrative offices – a David Lynch-like time-capsule of New Deal bureacracy. Now Spring/Break has been given a break in the form of two floors of a glass and steel high-rise 22 stories above Times Square. But there is no corresponding corporateness in the resulting display. The organizing principle remains: each room has its own curators who sometimes include the exhibiting artists themselves. It was gratifying for artcritical to see some of its own writers among the curators. Eric Sutphin, for instance, has brought together an inspired coupling of New York School painter Rosemarie Beck, who was active from the 1950s onwards with classically sourced, abstractly composed multi-figure compositions, and contemporary mannerist, Angela Dufresne, with her swirling, voluptuous, cinematic scenes. Each display has a neat little office of its own, with spectacular views of the midtown skyline. Too spectacular, sometimes, as it can overwhelm what’s on view. Inspired, therefore, was the decision to hang works in the blinds-drawn windows in one mini show, Thing Gap Method, selected by artcritical writer Megan Liu Kincheloe and featuring Sophia Flood, Sascha Ingber, Kelly McCafferty, Sarah Tortora and Kincheloe herself, whose Dice (2017) is pictured here. DAVID COHEN</p>
<p><strong>Thursday, March 2: The Armory Show at Piers 92 &amp; 94</strong></p>
<figure id="attachment_66543" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-66543" style="width: 550px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/trosch.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-66543"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-66543" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/trosch.jpg" alt="Thomas Trosch, One Day in the Life of Lovely Mars, 2008, Oil and encaustic on canvas on wood panel, 44 × 50 inches. Courtesy of the Artist and Fredericks &amp; Freiser, NY" width="550" height="482" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2017/02/trosch.jpg 550w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2017/02/trosch-275x241.jpg 275w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2017/02/trosch-370x324.jpg 370w" sizes="(max-width: 550px) 100vw, 550px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-66543" class="wp-caption-text">Thomas Trosch, One Day in the Life of Lovely Mars, 2008, Oil and encaustic on canvas on wood panel, 44 × 50 inches. Courtesy of the Artist and Fredericks &amp; Freiser, NY</figcaption></figure>
<p>It’s a good year for texture. Well, so is any year probably, and a good year for anything else if all you want to do is scatter evidence for some such glib hunch amidst the labyrinth that is the city’s biggest art fair, conceptual bread crumbs, so to speak, to trace your way back to the front door. But as the first piece to grab my eye was a fabric work by Jayson Musson at Philadelphia’s Fleisher-Ollman texture became my trail. Next stop, a cunningly camp “salon” for Florine Stettheimer, presented by Jeffrey Deitch, showing latter-day acolytes of the society heiress pioneer of the American avant garde where a 1990s shlock horror wedding cake of impasto by the unjustly forgotten Thomas Trosch abstractly emulated Florine’s Harlem beach scene that presides over the display. From there it was texture everywhere, whether the geological encrustations of Bosco Sodi, preponderant in the fair and to be seen, for instance, at Galeria Hilario Galguera of Mexico City, Blain Southern and Paul Kasmin; the very 1950s-looking sculpted netted grids of Michelle Grabner at James Cohan; or the painterly reliefs of Miguel Barcelo at Thaddeus Ropac. The tactility can even manifest vicariously, as in the Vik Muniz Isis print of a strangely mottled version of Picasso’s The Dreamer, at Edwin Houk. Haptic experiences grounded the gaze amidst the accelerating flow of spectacle. DAVID COHEN</p>
<p><strong>Featured item from The Armory Show 2017: Mernet Larsen at Various Small Fires</strong></p>
<figure id="attachment_66256" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-66256" style="width: 550px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/larsen-cover-e1488550458541.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-66256"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-66256" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/larsen-cover-e1488550458541.jpg" alt="Mernet Larsen, Faculty Meeting with Wendy, 2006. Acrylic on Bristol paper, 21 × 26 inches." width="550" height="447" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2017/03/larsen-cover-e1488550458541.jpg 550w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2017/03/larsen-cover-e1488550458541-275x224.jpg 275w" sizes="(max-width: 550px) 100vw, 550px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-66256" class="wp-caption-text">Mernet Larsen, Faculty Meeting with Wendy, 2006. Acrylic on Bristol paper, 21 × 26 inches.</figcaption></figure>
<p>Various Small Fires, the Los Angeles gallery, has a solo show of preparatory sketches by Tampa, Florida-based painter Mernet Larsen in the Presents section of The Armory Show 2017. Larsen, who also has a work on view at James Cohan Gallery’s booth at the same fair, has only recently come into her own since retiring from a distinguished career in art education, memories of which pervade her frequent return to the motif of the faculty meeting. Rooted in an earlier abstract practice as well as explorations of Japanese prints, Larsen’s jocular imagery thinly disguises her fascination with unconventional perspective systems. She pursues radical spatial solutions that eschew conventional single-point perspective in favor of parallel perspective, reverse perspective and eccentric, seemingly improvised but in fact rigorous fusions of different systems within the same work. By destabilizing the location of the viewer, sometimes indeed to the point of inducing vertigo, she forces us to know, rather than merely see, the situation. DAVID COHEN</p>
<p><strong>Friday, March 3: VOLTA NY at Pier 90, 12th Avenue @ 50th Street<a href="http://ny.voltashow.com/about/"><br />
</a></strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<figure id="attachment_66285" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-66285" style="width: 333px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/17098070_10209953352523442_2650906123601025991_o-e1488570891436.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-66285"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-66285" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/17098070_10209953352523442_2650906123601025991_o-e1488570891436.jpg" alt="Works by Ruth Hardinger presented at Volta by David &amp; Scheweitzer " width="333" height="500" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-66285" class="wp-caption-text">Works by Ruth Hardinger presented at Volta by David &amp; Scheweitzer Contemporary</figcaption></figure>
<p>Ruth Hardinger’s striking Volta display at David&amp;Scheweitzer Contemporary draws together disparate forces: the artist’s passionate environmental activism, her longstanding affinity with Mesoamerican culture, and historically informed, critically sharpened investigations of working methods. These are all felt in works such works as Bundle of Rights, a sculpture in plaster and rope, and Reading the Clouds, a tapestry collaboration with Mexican weavers, seen at the Piers. Meanwhile, back at the rancheros, that is to say 56 Bogart Street, the same gallery presents an ongoing retrospective overview of Hardinger work in different media. There are tapestries, a calendar, hanging works in paper and assembled sculptures. Obsessive-compulsive minimalist hatch drawings worked on varyingly rough and smooth surfaces are installed in a grid that conforms to the Golden Rule. Dating from the 1970s, this work manages to resonate with a recent, altogether more robust and spontaneous cast concrete and found slate sculptural arrangement. What binds these efforts across the decades is the humble yet inventive presentness of their maker. DAVID COHEN</p>
<p><strong>Saturday, March 4: The Art Show at Park Avenue Armory, 643 Park Avenue @ 66th Street</strong></p>
<figure id="attachment_66338" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-66338" style="width: 345px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/censored_grid.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-66338"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-66338" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/censored_grid.jpg" alt="A work by Betty Tompkins presented by PPOW at The Art Show" width="345" height="469" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2017/02/censored_grid.jpg 345w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2017/02/censored_grid-275x374.jpg 275w" sizes="(max-width: 345px) 100vw, 345px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-66338" class="wp-caption-text">A work by Betty Tompkins presented by PPOW at The Art Show</figcaption></figure>
<p>The New York art fair scene can be confusing to the uninitiated: the most prominent fair, The Armory Show, takes place at a convention center on the Hudson while the Park Avenue Armory hosts an unrelated fair of its own, The Art Show by the Art Dealer&#8217;s Association of America. The work shown in the actual armory tends to be more conservative than the offerings of most of the other fairs, but there can be some surprises. PPOW&#8217;s booth this year is devoted to the work of Betty Tompkins, an artist who has been painting portraits of the pudendum for over forty years. Today she is best known for her colossal coital canvases, but her smaller works on paper, such as &#8220;Censored Grid #1&#8221; from 1974, provide a more intimate view of an intimate act. ROMAN KALINOVSKI</p>
<p><strong>Independent (Art Fair) at <a href="http://independenthq.com/2017/new-york/">Spring Studios</a>, 50 Varick Street</strong></p>
<figure id="attachment_66337" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-66337" style="width: 500px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/independent.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-66337"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-66337" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/independent.jpg" alt="Works by Ervin Løffler and Landon Metz presented at Independent by Oslo gallery VI, VII" width="500" height="333" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2017/02/independent.jpg 500w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2017/02/independent-275x183.jpg 275w" sizes="(max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-66337" class="wp-caption-text">Works by Ervin Løffler and Landon Metz presented at Independent by Oslo gallery VI, VII</figcaption></figure>
<p>Memo to Independent Art Fair, organizers and exhibitors alike: Enough already, put up some labels.</p>
<p>In the early days of the Basel Art Fair (the real one, in Basel, Switzerland) galleries would get an official reprimand from the all-powerful committee if the labels didn’t include prices. Dealers complained that having to ask was an icebreaker with collectors. But to have to ask who the artist is – never mind the title, medium, date? This is elitist, pretentious and anti-intellectual. To the innocent “general public” this says, this isn’t for you folks. To professionals it is impertinent and irritating, putting one in the humiliating position of asking when you half-know and gobbling up precious time in doing so. For new, unknown artists with foreign names it is a total downer: who is going to remember it, next time? And for collectors, having to beg for basic information has all the novelty and subtlety of a robo-telecall.</p>
<p>Despite this mishegas. Independent is still one of the most pleasing visitor experiences, thanks in no small measure to the gorgeous venue. My epiphanies on this visit were mostly three-dimensional for some reason: Beverly Buchanan’s shack constructions at Andrew Edlin; a bafflingly kinky saddle mounted on a scaffold “horse” by Magali Reus at London’s Approach; and a dynamically voluptuous bronze by the late Hungarian-born Norwegian sculptor Ervin Løffler, exquisitely installed by Oslo gallery VI, VII with works in dye on canvas by young New Yorker Landon Metz (Photo: Sebastiano Pellion) DAVID COHEN</p>
<p><strong>Sunday, March 5: NADA New York at Skylight Clarkson North, 572 Washington Street</strong></p>
<figure id="attachment_66351" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-66351" style="width: 337px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Screen-Shot-2017-03-05-at-12.18.08-PM-e1488735579721.png" rel="attachment wp-att-66351"><img loading="lazy" class=" wp-image-66351" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Screen-Shot-2017-03-05-at-12.18.08-PM-e1488735579721.png" alt="Brenda Goodman, Lament, 2016. Oil on panel, 36 x 30 inches" width="337" height="432" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-66351" class="wp-caption-text">Brenda Goodman, Lament, 2016. Oil on panel, 36 x 30 inches</figcaption></figure>
<p>A work by Brenda Goodman presented by Jeff Bailey at NADA, the New Art Dealers Association, 2017 fair. NADA was founded in 2002, launching its first fair that year in Miami. This year sees some changes in its New York outing: the time slot has switched from Frieze Week to Armory Week, and they have a new venue in west Soho. In tune with the self-styled progressive profile of the association, half of ticket sales are to be donated to the ACLU. DAVID COHEN</p>
<figure id="attachment_66352" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-66352" style="width: 323px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/16995985_468843366573195_3544132708151513781_n-e1489044710472.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-66352"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-66352" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/16995985_468843366573195_3544132708151513781_n-e1489044710472.jpg" alt="A digital print by Chris Dorland presented at NADA by Super Dakota Gallery from Brussels" width="323" height="500" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-66352" class="wp-caption-text">A digital print by Chris Dorland presented at NADA by Super Dakota Gallery from Brussels</figcaption></figure>
<p>This year&#8217;s iteration of the NADA fair was probably the most visually exhausting of the art fair week group, with dozens of galleries competing for attention in micro-booths that barely allowed one person to stand comfortably inside. Most of the galleries were from around New York but there were some international standouts, such as a selection of digital prints by Chris Dorland, courtesy of Super Dakota gallery from Brussels. Dorland&#8217;s glitchy work, made using a broken scanner and printed on eight foot tall aluminum panels, offered something monumental and digital in a fair that leaned towards the modest and traditional. Pictured: Untitled (corporate cannibal), 2017. ROMAN KALINOVSKI</p>
<p><strong>Monday, March 6: Spring/Break Art Show, 4 Times Square</strong></p>
<figure id="attachment_66424" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-66424" style="width: 511px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/unnamed-1-1-e1489044829926.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-66424"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-66424" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/unnamed-1-1-e1489044829926.jpg" alt="A work from the Family Portrait series by Aneta Bartos, presented at Spring/Break" width="511" height="500" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-66424" class="wp-caption-text">A work from the Family Portrait series by Aneta Bartos, presented at Spring/Break</figcaption></figure>
<p>As befits the most youthful of the fairs, Spring/Break has an extra 24 hours of energy and determination than the others: it is the one fair in Fair Week that makes it to the Monday of the next. And here is an artist who knows how to capture zest. Aneta Bartos, whose dad Zbigniew Bartos has a lifetime of competitive bodybuilding behind him. Naturally, it was to her that he would turn, aged 68, to capture his musculature in its last glory. A room of buff, nicely toned father-daughter photographs takes home trophies for audacity and composure. DAVID COHEN</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2017/03/09/blurbs-art-fair-week-march-2017/">All Our Blurbs from Art Fair Week, March 2017</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://artcritical.com/2017/03/09/blurbs-art-fair-week-march-2017/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Built Differently: Mernet Larsen&#8217;s Strange Constructions</title>
		<link>https://artcritical.com/2016/03/11/david-brody-on-mernet-larsen/</link>
					<comments>https://artcritical.com/2016/03/11/david-brody-on-mernet-larsen/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Brody]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2016 02:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Exhibitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brody| David]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constructivism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Cohan Gallery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Larsen| Mernet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lissitzky| El]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[painting]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.artcritical.com/?p=55764</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The artist makes strange use of perspective, planes, and other building blocks of composition and narrative.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2016/03/11/david-brody-on-mernet-larsen/">Built Differently: Mernet Larsen&#8217;s Strange Constructions</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><em>Mernet Larsen: Things People Do</em> at James Cohan Gallery</strong></p>
<p>January 22 to February 21, 2016<br />
291 Grand Street (at Eldridge Street)<br />
New York City, 212 714 9500</p>
<figure id="attachment_55770" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-55770" style="width: 488px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-55770" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/LARSEN_Chainsawer_and_Bicyclist_2014_JCG8258_crop_large0.jpg" alt="Mernet Larsen, Chainsawer and Bicyclist, 2014. Acrylic and mixed media on canvas, 49 1/2 x 49 inches. Courtesy of the artist and James Cohan." width="488" height="500" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2016/03/LARSEN_Chainsawer_and_Bicyclist_2014_JCG8258_crop_large0.jpg 488w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2016/03/LARSEN_Chainsawer_and_Bicyclist_2014_JCG8258_crop_large0-275x282.jpg 275w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2016/03/LARSEN_Chainsawer_and_Bicyclist_2014_JCG8258_crop_large0-32x32.jpg 32w" sizes="(max-width: 488px) 100vw, 488px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-55770" class="wp-caption-text">Mernet Larsen, Chainsawer and Bicyclist, 2014. Acrylic and mixed media on canvas, 49 1/2 x 49 inches. Courtesy of the artist and James Cohan.</figcaption></figure>
<p>Mernet Larsen has been teasing us for a long while now with enigmatic, spatially-warped interiors: are they pure constructions or abstractions from daily life? Her bewitchingly plain, boxy people, the only possible inhabitants of such regimented spaces, are perhaps distant descendants of David Bomberg’s anxious Vorticist personages and Oskar Schlemmer&#8217;s utopian Bauhaus ones, as well as the lay figures of how-to-draw manuals and avatars in computer games. But they might not be as generic as they seem. Some have identifying features like beards and glasses that could hold keys to identity. Often their clarified, repressed gestures distill emotion. A recent show of Larsen’s paintings at the new downtown outpost of James Cohan Gallery staked a claim to conquered turf, freshly restating the terms of her practice. Clearly this lately minted star — it was the septuagenarian artist&#8217;s first show at a big-name New York gallery, and it sold out — is only just getting started.</p>
<figure id="attachment_55769" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-55769" style="width: 275px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><img loading="lazy" class="size-medium wp-image-55769" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/LARSEN_Alphie_2015_JCG8257_large0-275x496.jpg" alt="Mernet Larsen, Alphie, 2015. Acrylic and mixed media on canvas, 71 1/8 x 39 1/2 inches. Courtesy of the artist and James Cohan." width="275" height="496" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2016/03/LARSEN_Alphie_2015_JCG8257_large0-275x496.jpg 275w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2016/03/LARSEN_Alphie_2015_JCG8257_large0.jpg 277w" sizes="(max-width: 275px) 100vw, 275px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-55769" class="wp-caption-text">Mernet Larsen, Alphie, 2015. Acrylic and mixed media on canvas, 71 1/8 x 39 1/2 inches. Courtesy of the artist and James Cohan.</figcaption></figure>
<p>One of the new paintings, <em>Alphie</em> (2015), substantially obeys what Larsen calls reverse perspective, her trademark disrupter of conventional pictorial space. This algorithm, in which objects get larger as they recede, is not easy to intuit. You can start by noting that normal perspective paintings, like Piero della Francesca&#8217;s <em>Flagellation of Christ</em> (ca. 1455–1460)<em>, </em>use the very same grid, with parallel lines converging to a point. But Larsen knows how to booby-trap this grid so that, should she choose, she could restore the scale of Piero’s famously upstaged man-god, relegated to the rear, to his rightful priority.</p>
<p>Larsen’s eccentric viewpoints, if plotted conventionally, would actually be closer to Ed Ruscha&#8217;s Standard station or a vertiginous Jack Kirby <em>Fantastic Four</em> panel than to centralized Renaissance mises-en-scène. In <em>Alphie,</em> a perfectly logical, if Marvel Comics view of a brick wall hung with a foreshortened portrait rises obliquely on the left of a cafeteria scene. We are looking dramatically up, and can even see a bit of the ceiling. Yet figures sitting at tables — the main subject — are rendered on the grid as if viewed <em>from above</em>, the liquid in a wine glass and a coffee cup attesting to this dissonant gravity with level calm. No matter what you tell your eyes to see, the mapping of up onto down, and thus near onto far, feels dizzying and uncanny, quite aside from the weird proximity of the portrait-hung brick wall’s “normal” space, which somehow seamlessly amalgamates with the rest.</p>
<p><span style="line-height: 1.5;">Reverse perspective began to appear in Larsen&#8217;s already spatially disruptive compositions around 2007. Patches of the technique’s compelling illogic might be construed in Roman and Byzantine painting, and in the work of El Lissitzky (whom Larsen acknowledges as a source for many of the compositions here), as well as that of Josef Albers, M.C Escher, and Al Held. Larsen’s fully worked-through reverse projections, however, are unprecedented, aside from in the fascinating paintings of Scott Grodesky, who has also made powerful use of the device for many years. On the other hand, no space is ever quite global in Larsen’s world, and in the group of paintings shown at Cohan, the artist seemed at pains to display all the tricks up her sleeve. </span></p>
<p><span style="line-height: 1.5;"><em>Punch</em> (2016) is a variation on the dining theme, an interior of five rather bored friends around a circular table. As in </span><em style="line-height: 1.5;">Alphie</em><span style="line-height: 1.5;">, the nearest figure is the smallest, but it’s more that he and his two neighbors go upside down, ceiling-wise, while the table above bends magically back into an alternate, isometric gestalt.</span></p>
<figure id="attachment_55772" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-55772" style="width: 275px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><img loading="lazy" class="size-medium wp-image-55772" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/LARSEN_Reading_in_Bed_crop_large0-275x437.jpg" alt="Mernet Larsen, Reading in Bed, 2015. Acrylic and mixed media on canvas, 60 x 38 1/4 inches. Courtesy of the artist and James Cohan." width="275" height="437" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2016/03/LARSEN_Reading_in_Bed_crop_large0-275x437.jpg 275w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2016/03/LARSEN_Reading_in_Bed_crop_large0.jpg 315w" sizes="(max-width: 275px) 100vw, 275px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-55772" class="wp-caption-text">Mernet Larsen, Reading in Bed, 2015. Acrylic and mixed media on canvas, 60 x 38 1/4 inches. Courtesy of the artist and James Cohan.</figcaption></figure>
<p>With <em>Chainsawer and Bicyclist </em>(2014) Larsen explores even fresher ground. The ostensible subject is a suburban idyll or, alternately, a horror film depending on how one resolves a visual pun. Saul Steinberg would stage incompatible incidents along a single horizontal line, casting it sequentially as a marine horizon, the upper edge of a viaduct, a laundry line hung with clothes, and so on across a dozen pages. Larsen’s humor here is more devilish. The woman with the chainsaw is ominously poised to sever the bare linear logic of the room that contains her, and which also functions as a roadside curb to the oncoming, plunging bicyclist. With fewer shading cues than usual, Larsen lets axial geometry rule; we infer the bike’s front wheel only from a straight black swath, as if the wheel happened to be pitched and yawed just so. The imperiled line under the teeth of the saw barely holds the woman’s and the cyclist’s disparate spatial worlds together. Should time begin to flow, the speeding saw teeth would cut this slender fulcrum like the string of a balloon.</p>
<p>Such tensely buoyant dynamics are the rule of the new paintings. At any rate, they seem airier than Larsen’s previous acrylic canvases, which regularly included zones of impasto. Her current textures — degrees of astringency — are, if not quite as delightful, all the more decisive. Freehand or ruled pencil lines, as always, get the last word along crucial edges of figures, furniture, and architecture; the steely graphite joins Larsen’s smartly shaded planes of color, where needed, into Superflat inlay. Further evidence of the gnarly intellect of the artist’s hand was seen in a number of careful studies, collaged and gridded-off for transfer.</p>
<p>Along with thinner paint quality comes a new lightness of spirit, even overt parody. At any rate, the subjects have emerged from the claustrophobic basements of academe­­ — seminar rooms, linoleum-tiled corridors — into the great outdoors. <em>Frontier </em>(2015) with its rifle-thin riflemen quotes Barnaby Furnas’s Civil War figures almost too closely, substituting for Furnas’s angular bloodbaths the liquefied, queasy undulations of a deforested landscape. <em>Misstep</em> (2015) doesn’t depict the accident of the title so much as it cartoons the crisis of graduation, wherein a sturdy man and woman are sequentially falling forward, lemming-like, from a pixilated Minecraft cliff. Or, if you prefer, they roll off the end of an assembly line into the unknown.</p>
<p>In opening up and broadening their horizons, it must be said that many of the new paintings relinquish the uniquely pressurized sensation characteristic of Larsen’s previous work. But <em>Reading in Bed</em> (2015), in compensation, takes the psychological remapping of space to a new level, by bringing us into the quotidian intimacy of a couple’s domestic blahs. The wrongness of scale is right at home in the brooding disconnect between enormous, watchful wife and diminishing, distracted husband. As with the best of Larsen&#8217;s twisted, inverted interiors, one finds oneself — rather in the manner of the film <em>Being John Malkovich</em> (1999) <em>—</em> passing impossibly to the inside of another person’s head.</p>
<figure id="attachment_55771" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-55771" style="width: 275px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><img loading="lazy" class="size-medium wp-image-55771" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/LARSEN_Punch_2016_JCG8281_large0-275x309.jpg" alt="Mernet Larsen, Punch, 2016. Acrylic and mixed media on canvas, 68 1/2 x 61 1/2 inches. Courtesy of the artist and James Cohan." width="275" height="309" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2016/03/LARSEN_Punch_2016_JCG8281_large0-275x309.jpg 275w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2016/03/LARSEN_Punch_2016_JCG8281_large0.jpg 445w" sizes="(max-width: 275px) 100vw, 275px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-55771" class="wp-caption-text">Mernet Larsen, Punch, 2016. Acrylic and mixed media on canvas, 68 1/2 x 61 1/2 inches. Courtesy of the artist and James Cohan.</figcaption></figure>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2016/03/11/david-brody-on-mernet-larsen/">Built Differently: Mernet Larsen&#8217;s Strange Constructions</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://artcritical.com/2016/03/11/david-brody-on-mernet-larsen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>September 2012: Ariella Budick, Roberta Smith and Marjorie Welish with moderator David Cohen</title>
		<link>https://artcritical.com/2012/09/28/the-review-panel-september-2012/</link>
					<comments>https://artcritical.com/2012/09/28/the-review-panel-september-2012/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[THE EDITORS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 16:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[The Review Panel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al-Hadid| Diana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budick| Ariella]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Larsen| Mernet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richter| Gerhard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smith| Roberta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Welish| Marjorie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zittel| Andrea]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.artcritical.com/?p=26197</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Joined David Cohen to review shows of Diana Al-Hadid, Mernet Larsen, Gerhard Richter and Andrea Zittel</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2012/09/28/the-review-panel-september-2012/">September 2012: Ariella Budick, Roberta Smith and Marjorie Welish with moderator David Cohen</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[soundcloud url=&#8221;https://api.soundcloud.com/tracks/201606755&#8243; params=&#8221;color=ff5500&amp;auto_play=false&amp;hide_related=false&amp;show_comments=true&amp;show_user=true&amp;show_reposts=false&#8221; width=&#8221;100%&#8221; height=&#8221;166&#8243; iframe=&#8221;true&#8221; /]</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Joining Moderator David Cohen to review shows of Diana Al-Hadid at Marianne Boesky Gallery, Mernet Larsen at Vogt Gallery, Gerhard Richter at Marian Goodman Galley and Andrea Zittel at Andrea Rosen Gallery</p>
<figure id="attachment_26426" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-26426" style="width: 71px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/index-25.jpeg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-thumbnail wp-image-26426 " title="Mernet Larsen, Mall Event, 2010. Acrylic and mixed media on canvas, 50 x 55 inches.  Courtesy of Vogt Gallery" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/index-25-71x71.jpeg" alt="Mernet Larsen, Mall Event, 2010. Acrylic and mixed media on canvas, 50 x 55 inches.  Courtesy of Vogt Gallery" width="71" height="71" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2012/09/index-25-71x71.jpeg 71w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2012/09/index-25-275x275.jpeg 275w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2012/09/index-25-150x150.jpeg 150w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2012/09/index-25.jpeg 599w" sizes="(max-width: 71px) 100vw, 71px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-26426" class="wp-caption-text">click to enlarge</figcaption></figure>
<figure id="attachment_26211" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-26211" style="width: 71px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/2012-09-12_gerhard-richter1.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-thumbnail wp-image-26211  " title="Gerhard Richter, 925-1 STRIP, 2012. Unique digital print mounted between Aludibond and Perspex (diasec) in 3 parts, 118-1/8 x 118-1/8 inches.  Courtesy of Marian Goodman Gallery  " src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/2012-09-12_gerhard-richter1-71x71.jpg" alt="Gerhard Richter, 925-1 STRIP, 2012. Unique digital print mounted between Aludibond and Perspex (diasec) in 3 parts, 118-1/8 x 118-1/8 inches.  Courtesy of Marian Goodman Gallery  " width="71" height="71" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2012/09/2012-09-12_gerhard-richter1-71x71.jpg 71w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2012/09/2012-09-12_gerhard-richter1-275x275.jpg 275w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2012/09/2012-09-12_gerhard-richter1.jpg 500w" sizes="(max-width: 71px) 100vw, 71px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-26211" class="wp-caption-text">click to enlarge</figcaption></figure>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2012/09/28/the-review-panel-september-2012/">September 2012: Ariella Budick, Roberta Smith and Marjorie Welish with moderator David Cohen</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://artcritical.com/2012/09/28/the-review-panel-september-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
