<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Leslie + Lohman Museum of Gay and Lesbian Art &#8211; artcritical</title>
	<atom:link href="https://artcritical.com/tag/leslie-lohman-museum-of-gay-and-lesbian-art/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://artcritical.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2018 05:39:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.5.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>How Not to Vanish: Barbara Hammer&#8217;s Resilient Gaze</title>
		<link>https://artcritical.com/2018/01/19/rebecca-allan-on-barbara-hammer/</link>
					<comments>https://artcritical.com/2018/01/19/rebecca-allan-on-barbara-hammer/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rebecca Allan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2018 17:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Exhibitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hammer| Barbara]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leslie + Lohman Museum of Gay and Lesbian Art]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.artcritical.com/?p=75228</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Her show at the Leslie-Lohman is on view through January 28.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2018/01/19/rebecca-allan-on-barbara-hammer/">How Not to Vanish: Barbara Hammer&#8217;s Resilient Gaze</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The veteran multi-media artist, Barbara Hammer, and her interviewer, painter and regular artcritical contributor Rebecca Allan, were both residents recently at an artists&#8217; retreat on the Côte d&#8217;Azur.  Allan&#8217;s profile of the artist coincides with her exhibition at the Leslie-Lohman, on view through January 28.</strong></p>
<figure id="attachment_75235" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-75235" style="width: 275px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Barbara-Hammer-What-You-Are-Not-Supposed-To-Look-At-2014-photo-Mylar-x-ray-collage.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-75235"><img loading="lazy" class="size-medium wp-image-75235" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Barbara-Hammer-What-You-Are-Not-Supposed-To-Look-At-2014-photo-Mylar-x-ray-collage-275x312.jpg" alt="Barbara Hammer, What You Are Not Supposed To Look At, 2014. Photo, Mylar, x-ray collage. Collaborative project with Ingrid Chhristie (camera). Courtesy of the artist." width="275" height="312" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2018/01/Barbara-Hammer-What-You-Are-Not-Supposed-To-Look-At-2014-photo-Mylar-x-ray-collage-275x312.jpg 275w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2018/01/Barbara-Hammer-What-You-Are-Not-Supposed-To-Look-At-2014-photo-Mylar-x-ray-collage.jpg 441w" sizes="(max-width: 275px) 100vw, 275px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-75235" class="wp-caption-text">Barbara Hammer, What You Are Not Supposed To Look At, 2014. Photo, Mylar, x-ray collage. Collaborative project with Ingrid Chhristie (camera). Courtesy of the artist.</figcaption></figure>
<p><em>Barbara Hammer: Evidentiary Bodies </em>at the Leslie–Lohman Museum of Gay and Lesbian Art,</p>
<p>October 7, 2017 to January 28, 2018<br />
Curated by Staci Bu Shea and Carmel Curtis26 Wooster Street, between Canal and Grand streets<br />
New York City, leslielohman.org</p>
<p>Barbara Hammer jumps out of the rental car and sprints up Boulevard Jean Moulin, yelling <em>Vous partez?!</em> at the man who is unlocking his car. We are tangled in a spontaneous street protest in Marseille, as she attempts to flag down that parking spot we need. Typically, Hammer would wield a camera, but this time we&#8217;re on the lookout for the art supply store to buy drawing tools to take back to the artists&#8217; retreat where we&#8217;re both working in an idyllic Mediterranean fishing village. On the winding drive back to Cassis, we talk about <em>Resisting Paradise</em> (2003), Hammer&#8217;s film about the French Resistance Movement here, and the artist&#8217;s role in times of conflict. She describes her initial research, especially a meeting with Lisa Fittko, who helped Jews and anti-Hitler resisters to escape Nazi-occupied France for Spain, where they took passage to safe havens. Fittko smuggled Walter Benjamin through this corridor. I have a boulder in my stomach recognizing that the body of water we look out over from the refuge of our retreat has been the death site of 5079 migrants fleeing Syria and Africa in 2016. Barbara Hammer&#8217;s desire to bear witness to the hidden and the endangered—her curiosity about the historical and political reality of a particular landscape—has been on my mind since that summer.</p>
<figure id="attachment_75230" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-75230" style="width: 275px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Barbara-Hammer-in-her-Westbeth-studio-Rebecca-Allan-photo.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-75230"><img loading="lazy" class="size-medium wp-image-75230" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Barbara-Hammer-in-her-Westbeth-studio-Rebecca-Allan-photo-275x372.jpg" alt="Barbara Hammer in her Westbeth studio, November 2017. Photo: Rebecca Allan" width="275" height="372" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2018/01/Barbara-Hammer-in-her-Westbeth-studio-Rebecca-Allan-photo-275x372.jpg 275w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2018/01/Barbara-Hammer-in-her-Westbeth-studio-Rebecca-Allan-photo.jpg 370w" sizes="(max-width: 275px) 100vw, 275px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-75230" class="wp-caption-text">Barbara Hammer in her Westbeth studio, November 2017. Photo: Rebecca Allan</figcaption></figure>
<p>A flash of light pierces the hallway as Barbara opens the door, welcoming me to her studio at Westbeth in New York City. It is November 2017. We sit at a small table in front of windows overlooking a glistening Hudson River and the pilings, relics of submerged logs that once supported the piers along the Manhattan&#8217;s West Side. They draw they eye outward to the water, resembling film sprockets. Furnished simply with a desk and well-organized bookshelves, the studio contains an artwork suspended from the ceiling: a black steel and sheet-lead sculpture in the form of a girdle and bra by California-based artist Jann Nunn. Hammer and her partner Florrie Burke bought the work from the artist. As it dangles above Hammer&#8217;s head, I cannot figure out whether the material is leathery or hard, heavy or light. At Westbeth, the cooperative artists&#8217; residence that was the once Bell Laboratories (1868-1966), Hammer had been on the waiting list for seven years and previously lived in two other spaces there. She says that this studio is the loveliest; it feels like living in a ship. The space is essentially empty of her own work because it is on view at the Leslie-Lohman Museum of Gay and Lesbian Art. <em>Barbara Hammer: Evidentiary Bodies</em> is a multifaceted exhibition-project that includes a retrospective of work from the 1960s to the present, a series of performances and film screenings throughout New York, a companion show of her early photographs, and two new publications. Curated by Staci Bu Shea and Carmel Curtis, the exhibition is a cornucopia of archival material, previously unseen films, videos, paintings, drawings, collages, and installations that provide fresh insights into the life&#8217;s work of this pioneer of queer and experimental cinema, and the first living lesbian to have a retrospective at the museum. Hammer&#8217;s life-embracing, take-no-prisoners approach is a model of invention, endurance, and passion that would inspire anyone who seeks to live with undaunted courage and authenticity.</p>
<p>Born in 1939 in Hollywood, California, Barbara Hammer has, over the course of 40 years, created more than 80 works in film and video that have defied categorization and addressed subjects that had been invisible throughout history: lesbian sexuality and culture in particular, the nature of the artist and the space she works within, environmental and political injustice, and the process of living with cancer.</p>
<p>At Leslie-Lohman, an opening wall displays archival photographs of the performances—some hilarious and others profound—that Hammer has presented over the years. In one work, audience members roam around an inflated weather balloon, which is the projection surface for the film <em>Bent Time</em> (1983). Shot in high-energy locations such as Chaco Canyon and the Brooklyn Bridge, the film was influenced by the scientific theory that light rays curve at the outer edges of the universe, and by extension, that time also bends. &#8220;I used an extreme wide-angle lens of 9mm and one frame of film per foot of physical space to simulate the concept of time bending,&#8221; Hammer writes. The milky membrane of the balloon is a giant floating eye, staring back at us. Through silence or percussive sound, and in their unconventional modes of presentation, Hammer&#8217;s films demand an active viewer. Be prepared to feel awkward, to guffaw, to hear your neighbor&#8217;s breathing and your own digestive noise, to reconsider where film images belong, and at times to be eager for the stimulation to end.</p>
<figure id="attachment_75229" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-75229" style="width: 275px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/film-still-from-Double-Strength.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-75229"><img loading="lazy" class="size-medium wp-image-75229" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/film-still-from-Double-Strength-275x213.jpg" alt="Film still from Double Strength, 1978, 16mm film transferred to digital video, color, sound. Courtesy the artist and Electronic Arts Intermix, New York" width="275" height="213" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2018/01/film-still-from-Double-Strength-275x213.jpg 275w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2018/01/film-still-from-Double-Strength.jpg 550w" sizes="(max-width: 275px) 100vw, 275px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-75229" class="wp-caption-text">Film still from Double Strength, 1978, 16mm film transferred to digital video, color, sound. Courtesy the artist and Electronic Arts Intermix, New York</figcaption></figure>
<figure id="attachment_75230" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-75230" style="width: 275px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Barbara-Hammer-in-her-Westbeth-studio-Rebecca-Allan-photo.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-75230"><img loading="lazy" class="size-medium wp-image-75230" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Barbara-Hammer-in-her-Westbeth-studio-Rebecca-Allan-photo-275x372.jpg" alt="Barbara Hammer in her Westbeth studio, November 2017. Photo: Rebecca Allan" width="275" height="372" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2018/01/Barbara-Hammer-in-her-Westbeth-studio-Rebecca-Allan-photo-275x372.jpg 275w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2018/01/Barbara-Hammer-in-her-Westbeth-studio-Rebecca-Allan-photo.jpg 370w" sizes="(max-width: 275px) 100vw, 275px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-75230" class="wp-caption-text">Barbara Hammer in her Westbeth studio, November 2017. Photo: Rebecca Allan</figcaption></figure>
<p>In the short film <em>Double Strength</em>, (1978) the naked aerial dancer Terry Sendgraff swings and flies, performing strenuous acrobatic movements in suspension as Hammer films her from the ground, and from her own trapeze. Combining internal diegetic sound with found music, it is a lyrical essay in how the body interacts with gravity, as well as a meditation on the stages of a relationship from sexual awakening, through struggle, break-up, and enduring friendship. Considered alongside her film <em>A</em> <em>Horse is not a Metaphor</em> (2008), I see correspondences with the American artist Charles Demuth&#8217;s intimately scaled, homoerotic watercolors of circus performers, as well as the female equestriennes who worked within a vanished infrastructure of riding academies and horse shows in New York City after the Civil War.</p>
<p>Barbara Hammer&#8217;s drawings, paintings, collages and sculpture are intriguing elisions that reveal how the artist savors the metaphorical capacity of abstraction as well as the perceptual specificity of representation. <em>Cancer Bones</em> (1994) is a sculptural arrangement of thirty calf bones arranged on a low platform. Experimenting with the handcrafted potential of photography and sculpture, Hammer made Kodaliths of newspaper headlines which she projected onto the bones, then fixed them with photographic chemicals. Their desiccated shapes call to mind ancient pottery shards that scatter the landscape at Los Alamos, the birthplace of the atomic bomb. And remember all those bones that Georgia O&#8217;Keeffe painted in New Mexico? Hammer is pleased that her archives are now living near O&#8217;Keeffe&#8217;s letters, having recently been acquired by The Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library at Yale University.</p>
<figure id="attachment_75231" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-75231" style="width: 275px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Cancer-Bones-1994-Gelatin-print-on-calf-bones-30-parts.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-75231"><img loading="lazy" class="size-medium wp-image-75231" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Cancer-Bones-1994-Gelatin-print-on-calf-bones-30-parts-275x367.jpg" alt="Barbara Hammer, Cancer Bones, 1994. Gelatin print on calf bones, 30 parts. Courtesy of the artist." width="275" height="367" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2018/01/Cancer-Bones-1994-Gelatin-print-on-calf-bones-30-parts-275x367.jpg 275w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2018/01/Cancer-Bones-1994-Gelatin-print-on-calf-bones-30-parts.jpg 375w" sizes="(max-width: 275px) 100vw, 275px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-75231" class="wp-caption-text">Barbara Hammer, Cancer Bones, 1994. Gelatin print on calf bones, 30 parts. Courtesy of the artist.</figcaption></figure>
<p>During a cancer scare while travelling in Scotland in 2014, Hammer secretly staged a photo series at a former veterinary hospital (with visual artist Ingrid Christie). She combined the photographs taken amidst the abandoned medical equipment with x-ray images of her own body to construct a series of collages titled <em>What You Are Not Supposed to Look At</em> (2014). With imagery that evokes the isolation and medicalization of illness, Hammer&#8217;s sophisticated utilization of translucent color along with layered and doubled images of her body evoke Robert Rauschenberg&#8217;s ghostlike Hoarfrost collages as well as John Coplans&#8217; photographs of his own aging flesh. Confessing that she never liked primary colors, Hammer is a nonetheless a learned and subtle colorist, whose earliest experiments with painting occurred when she was studying with William Moorhouse at San Francisco State in the early 1970s. There, painting directly onto 16mm film leader, she used a paint made for aquariums, a moment that catalyzed her sustained practice of breaking the barriers between painting, film, and photography. More recently, <em>Blue Paint Film Scroll</em> (2015) an 18-foot long digital print, originated from a 10-inch-long strip of 16mm film that Hammer treated with hydrochloric acid, salt crystals and paint. Burning and dodging her film in this new way, Hammer creates fizzy bubbles and pools of aquamarine blue, violet, and saffron yellow. Are these the insides of the lungs or pools of crude oil floating on the surface the Gulf of Mexico after the Deepwater Horizon disaster?</p>
<p>I first understood the obliterating power of water as a child, tiptoeing along the boulders of the breakwall in Ashtabula Harbor, Ohio, on Lake Erie. At 78, Barbara Hammer, stands on the treacherous side of the Marseilles seawall, proving that the risk of disappearing is worth the quest to find what more can be revealed when you tear down your defenses.</p>
<figure id="attachment_75232" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-75232" style="width: 275px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Blue-Paint-Film-Scroll.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-75232"><img loading="lazy" class="size-medium wp-image-75232" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Blue-Paint-Film-Scroll-275x466.jpg" alt="Barbara Hammer, Blue Paint Film Scroll, 2015. Crystals in hydrochloric acid and paint on film, digitally transferred and printed on archival photo paper. Courtesy of the artist." width="275" height="466" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2018/01/Blue-Paint-Film-Scroll-275x466.jpg 275w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2018/01/Blue-Paint-Film-Scroll.jpg 295w" sizes="(max-width: 275px) 100vw, 275px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-75232" class="wp-caption-text">Barbara Hammer, Blue Paint Film Scroll, 2015. Crystals in hydrochloric acid and paint on film, digitally transferred and printed on archival photo paper. Courtesy of the artist.</figcaption></figure>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2018/01/19/rebecca-allan-on-barbara-hammer/">How Not to Vanish: Barbara Hammer&#8217;s Resilient Gaze</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://artcritical.com/2018/01/19/rebecca-allan-on-barbara-hammer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beyond the Studio &#038; Out of the Closet: Art and Sex on the Waterfront, 1971-83</title>
		<link>https://artcritical.com/2012/07/05/waterfront/</link>
					<comments>https://artcritical.com/2012/07/05/waterfront/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Cohen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2012 04:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Exhibitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hujar| Peter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leslie + Lohman Museum of Gay and Lesbian Art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matta-Clark| Gordon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seccombe| Shelley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stellar| Stanley]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.artcritical.com/?p=25425</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Leslie + Lohman Museum of Gay and Lesbian Art</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2012/07/05/waterfront/">Beyond the Studio &#038; Out of the Closet: Art and Sex on the Waterfront, 1971-83</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>The Piers: Art and Sex along the New York Waterfront</em> at the Leslie + Lohman Museum of Gay and Lesbian Art</p>
<p>April 4 to July 7, 2012<br />
26 Wooster Street, between Grand and Canal streets<br />
New York City, 212-431-2609</p>
<figure id="attachment_25426" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-25426" style="width: 600px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/tress-hujar.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-25426 " title="Arthur Tress, The Urinal, 1979. Silver gelatin print, edition of 50, 14 x 11 inches. Courtesy of ClampArt, New York City, and right, Peter Hujar, Crossed Legs on the Pier, 1976. Silver gelatin print, 14.5 x 14.5 inches. The Peter Hujar Archive, Courtesy Matthew Marks Gallery" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/tress-hujar.jpg" alt="Arthur Tress, The Urinal, 1979. Silver gelatin print, edition of 50, 14 x 11 inches. Courtesy of ClampArt, New York City, and right, Peter Hujar, Crossed Legs on the Pier, 1976. Silver gelatin print, 14.5 x 14.5 inches. The Peter Hujar Archive, Courtesy Matthew Marks Gallery" width="600" height="295" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2012/07/tress-hujar.jpg 600w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2012/07/tress-hujar-275x135.jpg 275w" sizes="(max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-25426" class="wp-caption-text">Arthur Tress, The Urinal, 1979. Silver gelatin print, edition of 50, 14 x 11 inches. Courtesy of ClampArt, New York City, and right, Peter Hujar, Crossed Legs on the Pier, 1976. Silver gelatin print, 14.5 x 14.5 inches. The Peter Hujar Archive, Courtesy Matthew Marks Gallery</figcaption></figure>
<p>This fascinating, intelligently-conceived, at once astute  and celebratory exhibition, organized by Jonathan Weinberg and artist Darren Jones, documents, mostly through photographs, a moment of unique intersection between several histories: gay, art, industrial and New York. From 1971 to 1983 – post-Stonewall and pre-AIDS, and at a time of social liberation and economic distress – the rapidly decaying wharfs and docks on the West Side below 14th Street were the site of unprecedented sexual and artistic experimentation.  As commercial shipping moved to Jersey and Brooklyn and a bankrupt city could not afford to police its abandoned industrial stock along the waterfront, artists and gays, for varying reasons, seized the day (and night).</p>
<p>In a heady fusion of hedonism and politics, the Stonewall riots of 1969 empowered new levels of public affection.  Docks and sailors held historic associations of gay adventure anyway, but the virtual police no-go piers proved an enticing playground for those who liked it rough. “Why do gays love ruins?” asks a character in Andrew Holleran’s novel, <em>Nostalgia for the Mud</em>, quoted by Weinberg as the epigraph to his accompanying essay<em>.  </em>“The Lower West Side, the docks.  Why do we love slums so much?”  “One can hardly suck cock on Madison Avenue, darling” comes the reply.  With the ocean liners gone, cruising began in earnest.</p>
<figure id="attachment_25427" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-25427" style="width: 432px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Seccombe.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-25427 " title="Shelley Seccombe, Sunbathing on the Edge, Pier 52, 1977. Contemporary archival digital print, edition of 25, 11 x 15 inches. Courtesy of the artist" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Seccombe.jpg" alt="Shelley Seccombe, Sunbathing on the Edge, Pier 52, 1977. Contemporary archival digital print, edition of 25, 11 x 15 inches. Courtesy of the artist" width="432" height="312" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2012/07/Seccombe.jpg 432w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2012/07/Seccombe-275x198.jpg 275w" sizes="(max-width: 432px) 100vw, 432px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-25427" class="wp-caption-text">Shelley Seccombe, Sunbathing on the Edge, Pier 52, 1977. Contemporary archival digital print, edition of 25, 11 x 15 inches. Courtesy of the artist</figcaption></figure>
<p>But the piers were also compelling for artists, regardless of their orientation.  The abandoned real estate proved a perfect canvas for Gordon Matta-Clark’s literally breakthrough environmental interventions, his “building cuts.”  The show is rich in photographs of <em>Day’s End (Pier 52)</em>, his iconic cutout at the river’s end, steel wall of a mammoth shed, an Ellsworth Kelly-like sail-shaped puncture opening the dark interior to daylight.  Beside Matta-Clark’s own photographic diptych of his work there are images by urban photographers who documented the Piers scene such as Harry Shunk, Leonard Fink, Frank Hallam and Shelley Seccombe, who captures guys sunbathing along a jetty oblivious of the cut formed behind them in the name of art.  In contrast to literally and sexually cold nocturnal activities, the piers became a great place for mass gay sunbathing, and were soon dubbed “Manhattan Beach.”</p>
<p>For Vito Acconci, the dark, sinister, edgy quality of the wharfs made a suitable locus for <em>Untitled Project for Pier 17 </em>(1971). As announced in a printed statement posted at the John Gibson Gallery, the artist waited at a designated hour at the end of the pier and to anyone who came to see him there he would reveal “something that has not been exposed before and that would be disturbing for me to make public.”  Matta-Clark and Acconci were both made aware of the piers by ground-breaking curator Willoughby Sharp who anticipated the post-studio potential of the waterfront.</p>
<p>Artists and queers are by no means mutually exclusive groups, of course, but as cohabiters of the abandoned piers they were an odd couple.  Could this come down to the fact that for gays, whether there to cruise or sunbathe, the piers were perfect just as they were, a place in which life could improve, while for the artists, the piers were mere raw material, awaiting their magic touch?  The relations were active and passive: for gays, the piers were transformative whereas for artists the piers awaited transformation. Matta-Clark, as if anticipating a charge of vandalism of city property, defended himself in a rather prissy manifesto of 1975 in which he lamented the way the properties had been taken over by “a recently popularized sado-masochistic fringe,” arguing that his interventions would “transform the structure in the midst of its ugly criminal state into a place of interest, fascination and value.”  The city would ultimately do its own improvements, leveling the piers to create the running and cycling trails we have today.</p>
<p>Of course, both Matta-Clark’s macho hole busting and Acconci’s whispered secrets can be read as playing, with innuendo, upon the gayness of what was going on around them, a collision of sub and high culture.  But art in the piers was not all about cold cuts and furtive revelations: there was “gay abandon” aplenty.  At the end of the period covered by this show, in 1983, Mike Bidlo and David Wojnarowicz took over the Ward Line Pier which they made an extension of the then burgeoning East Village scene.  For artists they attracted like Luis Frangella and Judy Glantzman, the vacant industrial spaces were Sistine chapels awaiting their mural painting exuberance.  The Austrian street artist Tava (Gustav von Will) was already decorating the piers with stories high gay graphics of great skill and verve.</p>
<p>Sometimes, business and pleasure could be combined.  Colleagues Stanley Stellar and Peter Hujar ran into one another during a photo shoot at Pier 46 in 1981, as Weinberg recounts.  The photographers shot pictures of one another on Stellar’s camera.  And Hujar posed, getting a blow job, in the background of Stellar’s portrait of J.D. Slater as the celebrated porn-star leaned half-naked against a door jam with Keith Haring graffiti behind him, “a startling juxtaposition between an act of fellatio, a beautiful male body, and a signature Haring,” as Weinberg writes. This sumptuous photograph seems to be saying, in paraphrase of a chant made popular at the time: It’s a pier, we’re all here, get used to it.</p>
<figure id="attachment_25428" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-25428" style="width: 71px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/stellar.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-thumbnail wp-image-25428 " title="Stanley Stellar, Peter Gets His Dick Sucked, 1981. Contemporary digital print, 42 x 28 inches. Collection of Leslie-Lohman Museum. Gift of the artist" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/stellar-71x71.jpg" alt="Stanley Stellar, Peter Gets His Dick Sucked, 1981. Contemporary digital print, 42 x 28 inches. Collection of Leslie-Lohman Museum. Gift of the artist" width="71" height="71" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-25428" class="wp-caption-text">click to enlarge</figcaption></figure>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2012/07/05/waterfront/">Beyond the Studio &#038; Out of the Closet: Art and Sex on the Waterfront, 1971-83</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://artcritical.com/2012/07/05/waterfront/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
