<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PPOW &#8211; artcritical</title>
	<atom:link href="https://artcritical.com/tag/ppow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://artcritical.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2016 05:00:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.5.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>De Beauvouir&#8217;s Inheritors: &#8220;The Woman Destroyed&#8221; at PPOW</title>
		<link>https://artcritical.com/2016/07/22/katelynn-mills-on-woman-destroyed/</link>
					<comments>https://artcritical.com/2016/07/22/katelynn-mills-on-woman-destroyed/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Katelynn Mills]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2016 17:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Exhibitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ellen| Enid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glaessner| Elizabeth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kelly| Lauren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mills| Katelynn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mramor| David]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[painting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPOW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Schulnik| Alison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sculpture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stoller| Jessica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Williams| Robin F.]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.artcritical.com/?p=59604</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A painterly, sumptuous show of work by women.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2016/07/22/katelynn-mills-on-woman-destroyed/">De Beauvouir&#8217;s Inheritors: &#8220;The Woman Destroyed&#8221; at PPOW</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><em>The Woman Destroyed</em> at P.P.O.W</strong></p>
<p>June 30 to July 29, 2016<br />
535 West 22nd Street (between 10th and 11th avenues)<br />
New York, 212 647 1044</p>
<figure id="attachment_59696" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-59696" style="width: 550px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/2011_WallFlower_24x20.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-59696"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-59696" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/2011_WallFlower_24x20.jpg" alt="Lauren Kelley, still from Froufrou Conclusions, 2011. Digital video, TRT: 1:29. Courtesy of the artist and PPOW." width="550" height="312" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2016/07/2011_WallFlower_24x20.jpg 550w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2016/07/2011_WallFlower_24x20-275x156.jpg 275w" sizes="(max-width: 550px) 100vw, 550px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-59696" class="wp-caption-text">Lauren Kelley, still from Froufrou Conclusions, 2011. Digital video, TRT: 1:29. Courtesy of the artist and PPOW.</figcaption></figure>
<p>“The Woman Destroyed,” a group exhibition at P.P.O.W, titled after Simone de Beauvoir’s work of fiction, is a latently hostile display of frustration aimed toward overused, female-unfriendly tropes. Picking up where De Beauvoir leaves off in her book, which focuses on the lives of middle-aged women and their unsexy encounters with betrayal, failure, and various crises, these six artists each embody a unique and complicated experience that emerges from such a disadvantage.</p>
<figure id="attachment_59699" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-59699" style="width: 275px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/2016_BagLady_40x58.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-59699"><img loading="lazy" class="size-medium wp-image-59699" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/2016_BagLady_40x58-275x391.jpg" alt="Robin F. Williams, Bag Lady 2016. Acrylic and oil on canvas. Courtesy of the artist and PPOW." width="275" height="391" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2016/07/2016_BagLady_40x58-275x391.jpg 275w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2016/07/2016_BagLady_40x58.jpg 352w" sizes="(max-width: 275px) 100vw, 275px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-59699" class="wp-caption-text">Robin F. Williams, Bag Lady 2016. Acrylic and oil on canvas. Courtesy of the artist and PPOW.</figcaption></figure>
<p>Perhaps the poster image for this exhibition is <em>Bag Lady</em> (2016) by Robin F. Williams. According to urban slang, a Bag Lady is a homeless and/or crazy woman who carries all her possessions in an assortment of bags. Another colloquialism explains that if a man wishes to have sex with an ugly woman that he may better his experience by putting a bag over her head. In this painting, the insulting act of hooding her subject with a bag is muffled by the trippy palette, the stormy, gray atmosphere blooming in the distance, and by the subject’s relaxed attitude, which lets the viewer know that she&#8217;s been through this sort of thing at least a thousand times. She&#8217;s a self-proclaimed Bag Lady that put the bag on her own damn head. Maybe it&#8217;s her way of saying that her mind is her only true possession — and that men finding her sexually attractive is not her main occupation. Williams’s other painting in the show, <em>In the Gutter</em> (2015), is a similar display of bad-assery. The model in this picture looks as though she walked off a billboard of naked women selling watches or shoes, and assumed a squat right over a gutter, as if to say “Sell this.” The crass gesture, coupled with her beautiful form adorned in golden shoes and matching belt, reinforce the simultaneously sad and unapologetic situation: a strong, capable woman stuck playing one of the most intellectually underwhelming roles of her life.</p>
<p>Elizabeth Glaessner’s 20 small paintings (all 2016) slip into a deeper, psychological realm. The space is internal, slow, and sludgy; each picture resembles a snapshot from a psychedelic vision or nightmare. <em>Circling</em>, for instance, reads like a creepy transcription of the Three Fates. The color emits a curious internal light and is often applied with direct, gestural mark-making. <em>Helping a Friend</em> has raised, red iron oxide hands in the immediate foreground, which suggest that the dreamer is falling away from, or calling out to, the two figures struggling in the mid ground. De Beauvoir wrote, in <em>The Second Sex</em> (1949), that, “one is not born, but rather becomes, a woman.” These images feel as though they move from the emergence to dissimilation of a woman — that a lifetime of memories and experience produce a psyche that is irreconcilable with reality perceived at face value. Glaessner’s figures appear to be forgetting their womanhood.</p>
<p>A similar disparate culling of inner thought and outer being can be found in David Mramor’s work. Mramor, who sometimes goes by his feminine pseudonym, Enid Ellen, features photographs of his late mother. The images, printed on canvas are embellished with smudges and lines of acrylic to create a juxtaposition of reality and painted marks. Ambiguous yet provoking, the pictures seem to point to an inability to access his mother, his inner womanhood, or even a comfortable synthesis of his his male and female attributes. The blatant clashing of language in his work corresponds to a dichotomous sensibility weighted by melancholy.</p>
<figure id="attachment_59700" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-59700" style="width: 275px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/2016_Slip-view-2_12.5x10x7.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-59700"><img loading="lazy" class="size-medium wp-image-59700" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/2016_Slip-view-2_12.5x10x7-275x273.jpg" alt="Jessica Stoller, Untitled (slip) 2016, porcelain, china paint, lustre, 12 1/2 x 10 x 7 inches. Courtesy of the artist and PPOW." width="275" height="273" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2016/07/2016_Slip-view-2_12.5x10x7-275x273.jpg 275w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2016/07/2016_Slip-view-2_12.5x10x7-71x71.jpg 71w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2016/07/2016_Slip-view-2_12.5x10x7-32x32.jpg 32w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2016/07/2016_Slip-view-2_12.5x10x7-64x64.jpg 64w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2016/07/2016_Slip-view-2_12.5x10x7-96x96.jpg 96w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2016/07/2016_Slip-view-2_12.5x10x7-128x128.jpg 128w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2016/07/2016_Slip-view-2_12.5x10x7-150x150.jpg 150w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2016/07/2016_Slip-view-2_12.5x10x7.jpg 550w" sizes="(max-width: 275px) 100vw, 275px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-59700" class="wp-caption-text">Jessica Stoller, Untitled (slip) 2016, porcelain, china paint, lustre, 12 1/2 x 10 x 7 inches. Courtesy of the artist and PPOW.</figcaption></figure>
<p>Moving from male-female to female-animal, <em>Centaurette in Forest</em> (2015), by Alison Schulnik, is a visceral, chunky rendering of a lady centaur. Not a bull in a china shop, but a centaurette in a cake shop, the frantic creature grasping at the sides of her head appears as though she herself is an amalgamation of frosting, wading through the surrounding flora, which is equally goopy. Historically, female centaurs rarely appear in mythology but are occasionally found in Greek and Roman mosaics. Conceivably, this work speaks to the nature of existing without the power to communicate — of being trapped. Similar in both form and content, Lauren Kelly’s digital print, <em>Wall Flower</em> (2011), depicts a constructed mini dancehall. A doll, whose face is cropped out of the shot, sits amid a cluster of empty chairs, wearing a billowing dress literally made of cake frosting. What was made to be tasted and enjoyed by others goes unsampled, either because her choice to withhold it, or by rejection of others.</p>
<p>Looking at Jessica Stoller’s sculpture, <em>Slip</em> (2016), we see again the persistent theme of dessert. The subject of a porcelain bust rears her head, smiling as she balances various pastries, sweets, and plates that have been plopped on top. But unlike Schulnik or Kelly’s females, who are either frantic or lonely, and different even from Williams’s cool and collected women, the figure here appears content — as though she&#8217;s merely wearing an extravagant hat to a Surrealist costume ball. Ultimately, what the various dispositions portrayed have in common is a post-angry dissatisfaction with the onslaught of slangs and expectations that women remarkably deal with.</p>
<figure id="attachment_59702" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-59702" style="width: 275px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/VenusBed3.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-59702"><img loading="lazy" class="size-medium wp-image-59702" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/VenusBed3-275x186.jpg" alt="David Mramor, Venus in Bed 3, 2014. Acrylic paint and archival inkjet on canvas, 48 x 72 inches. Courtesy of the artist and PPOW." width="275" height="186" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2016/07/VenusBed3-275x186.jpg 275w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2016/07/VenusBed3.jpg 550w" sizes="(max-width: 275px) 100vw, 275px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-59702" class="wp-caption-text">David Mramor, Venus in Bed 3, 2014. Acrylic paint and archival inkjet on canvas, 48 x 72 inches. Courtesy of the artist and PPOW.</figcaption></figure>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2016/07/22/katelynn-mills-on-woman-destroyed/">De Beauvouir&#8217;s Inheritors: &#8220;The Woman Destroyed&#8221; at PPOW</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://artcritical.com/2016/07/22/katelynn-mills-on-woman-destroyed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Secret World: The Art of Martin Wong</title>
		<link>https://artcritical.com/2016/01/31/david-carrier-on-martin-wong/</link>
					<comments>https://artcritical.com/2016/01/31/david-carrier-on-martin-wong/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Carrier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2016 19:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Exhibitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bronx Museum of the Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logothetis| Aristides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPOW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wong| Martin]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.artcritical.com/?p=54582</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The East Village artist, who died in 1999, gets a retrospective at the Bronx Museum of the Arts </p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2016/01/31/david-carrier-on-martin-wong/">Secret World: The Art of Martin Wong</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Martin Wong: Human Instamatic at the Bronx Museum of the Arts</p>
<p>November 4, 2015 to February 14, 2016<br />
1040 Grand Concourse, Bronx, (718) 681-6000</p>
<figure id="attachment_54585" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-54585" style="width: 550px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/wong-secret-world.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-54585"><img loading="lazy" class="wp-image-54585 size-full" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/wong-secret-world.jpg" alt="Martin Wong, My Secret World, 1978-81. Acrylic on canvas, 121 x 172 inches. Collection of Melva Bucksbaum and Raymond Learsy" width="550" height="387" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2016/01/wong-secret-world.jpg 550w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2016/01/wong-secret-world-275x194.jpg 275w" sizes="(max-width: 550px) 100vw, 550px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-54585" class="wp-caption-text">Martin Wong, My Secret World, 1978-81. Acrylic on canvas, 121 x 172 inches. Collection of Melva Bucksbaum and Raymond Learsy</figcaption></figure>
<p>“The pleasure which we derive from the representation of the present,” according to Baudelaire in “The Painter of Modern Life”, “is due not only to the beauty with which it can be invested, but also to its essential quality of being present.” The passion of such an artist, he adds, is “to become one flesh with the crowd.” Both the subjects and the manner of their presentation in this generous survey of 96 paintings, many of them large, by Martin Wong (1946-1999) mark him as a perfect exemplar of that ideal. Early on he did self-portraits. Then he painted crumbling tenement walls, as in <em>Iglesia Pentecostal </em> (1986); prisons, of which <em>Penitentary Fox </em>(1988) is one and, also, sexual encounters in prison such as <em>The Annunciation According to Mikey </em>Piñero<em> (Cupcake and Paco) </em>(1984)—one of Wong’s great lovers was a jailbird; firemen, as in <em>I Really Like the Way Firemen Smell </em>(1988); street scenes, like <em>Canal Street </em>(1992); brick walls, sometimes shown behind men kissing, as in <em>Sharp &amp; Dottie </em>(1984). His very distinctive dark palette – earth reds, burnt Siennas, ochers, and umbers—was derived from his experience as a potter. Wong loved to put words in his paintings, in book titles, signposts and captions which appear in English and Spanish, but also often in ASL (American Sign Language), as for instance in <em>Psychiatrists Testify: Demon Dogs Drive Man to Murder </em>(1980).</p>
<p><em>My Secret World, 1978-1981 </em>(1984) nicely summarizes the world found in Wong’s art. Looking into his bedroom behind the brick wall in a down-and-out hotel, identified with a caption above the window, we see a bed; some of his books—he was a collector; and a number of the paintings in this exhibition. Another caption identifies this as the room where the first painting for the hearing impaired was made. Wong grew up in San Francisco, near Chinatown; went to school at Humboldt State University, studying ceramics; and then in 1978 moved to Manhattan.</p>
<figure id="attachment_54586" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-54586" style="width: 275px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/wong-heaven.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-54586"><img loading="lazy" class="size-medium wp-image-54586" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/wong-heaven-275x275.jpg" alt="Martin Wong, Heaven 1988. Acrylic on canvas, 72 inches in diameter. Estate of Martin Wong, courtesy of PPOW Gallery" width="275" height="275" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2016/01/wong-heaven-275x275.jpg 275w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2016/01/wong-heaven-71x71.jpg 71w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2016/01/wong-heaven-32x32.jpg 32w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2016/01/wong-heaven-64x64.jpg 64w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2016/01/wong-heaven-96x96.jpg 96w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2016/01/wong-heaven-128x128.jpg 128w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2016/01/wong-heaven-150x150.jpg 150w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2016/01/wong-heaven.jpg 450w" sizes="(max-width: 275px) 100vw, 275px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-54586" class="wp-caption-text">Martin Wong, Heaven 1988. Acrylic on canvas, 72 inches in diameter. Estate of Martin Wong, courtesy of PPOW Gallery</figcaption></figure>
<p>Just as the Impressionists’ paintings of contemporary life don’t depict every scene found in their Paris, so Wong doesn’t show every subject found downtown in his New York. He doesn’t depict life inside the restaurants or stores. Nor does he usually show families—he focuses on the blank facades, and on gay men. He seems to have been exclusively an urban artist—like Baudelaire, he was resolutely uninterested in nature, or, even, in city parks, or the suburbs. That he associated the words in his paintings with writing in old master Chinese painting is unsurprising, for he was a connoisseur of that tradition. But how different his pictures are from any precedents. Wong was a graffiti collector—his large collection was displayed in 2014 at the Museum of the City of New York. His <em>Sharp Paints a Picture (Collaboration with Sharp) </em>(1997-98) shows a graffiti master with one of his works. But unlike most of those street artists, he benefitted from art school training. His uses of blankness and flat backgrounds and the scale of his best pictures makes him very much a late modernist—<em>Heaven </em> (1988) a big tondo, shows the bricks of a wall in lovingly close detail.</p>
<p>Wong’s first solo exhibition was in 1984. Unlike other East Village artists of that time, he does not appear to have been involved with any theorizing about art. The then much discussed concept of ‘postmodernism’ has nothing to do with his art. But, as often is the case with art rooted in contemporary life, some of his subjects now require identification. To understand <em>Courtroom Shocker/Jimmy the Weasil Sings Like a Canary </em>(1983), which is filled with ASL, you need to now that Jimmy Weasil was Jimmy Fratianno, the mobster who testified before a jury in 1981. Wong’s best pictures are immediately powerful because they are direct. “When I was younger,” he said near the end of his too-short life, “I was always paranoid that I would die before I could finish my paintings.” But, he then adds, “at a certain point I actually finished them.” He was a great painter –he created a picture-perfect presentation of a world that has mostly disappeared, Manhattan’s pre-gentrified Lower East Side.</p>
<figure id="attachment_54587" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-54587" style="width: 550px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Sharp-Paints-A-Picture-1997-98_48x30.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-54587"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-54587" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Sharp-Paints-A-Picture-1997-98_48x30.jpg" alt="Martin Wong, Sharp Paints a Picture (Collaboration with Sharp) , 1997-98. Acrylic on canvase, 30 x 48 inches. The Estate of Martin Wong, courtesy of PPOW Gallery" width="550" height="340" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2016/01/Sharp-Paints-A-Picture-1997-98_48x30.jpg 550w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2016/01/Sharp-Paints-A-Picture-1997-98_48x30-275x170.jpg 275w" sizes="(max-width: 550px) 100vw, 550px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-54587" class="wp-caption-text">Martin Wong, Sharp Paints a Picture (Collaboration with Sharp) , 1997-98. Acrylic on canvase, 30 x 48 inches. The Estate of Martin Wong, courtesy of PPOW Gallery</figcaption></figure>
<figure id="attachment_54588" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-54588" style="width: 499px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/martin-wong-courtroom.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-54588"><img loading="lazy" class="wp-image-54588 size-full" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/martin-wong-courtroom.jpg" alt="Martin Wong, Courtroom Shocker/Jimmy the Weasil Sings Like a Canary 1984. Acrylic on canvas, 48 x 48 inches. Courtesy of Michael Rosenberg Gallery, LLC, New York" width="499" height="500" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2016/01/martin-wong-courtroom.jpg 499w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2016/01/martin-wong-courtroom-71x71.jpg 71w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2016/01/martin-wong-courtroom-275x276.jpg 275w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2016/01/martin-wong-courtroom-32x32.jpg 32w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2016/01/martin-wong-courtroom-64x64.jpg 64w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2016/01/martin-wong-courtroom-96x96.jpg 96w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2016/01/martin-wong-courtroom-128x128.jpg 128w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2016/01/martin-wong-courtroom-150x150.jpg 150w" sizes="(max-width: 499px) 100vw, 499px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-54588" class="wp-caption-text">Martin Wong, Courtroom Shocker/Jimmy the Weasil Sings Like a Canary 1984. Acrylic on canvas, 48 x 48 inches. Courtesy of Michael Rosenberg Gallery, LLC, New York</figcaption></figure>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2016/01/31/david-carrier-on-martin-wong/">Secret World: The Art of Martin Wong</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://artcritical.com/2016/01/31/david-carrier-on-martin-wong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>October 2007: Nancy Princenthal, Gregory Volk, and John Zinsser with moderator David Cohen</title>
		<link>https://artcritical.com/2007/10/12/review-panel-october-2007/</link>
					<comments>https://artcritical.com/2007/10/12/review-panel-october-2007/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[THE EDITORS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 15:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[The Review Panel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Calame| Ingrid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Zwirner Gallery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heffernan| Julie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Cohan Gallery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pettibon| Raymond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPOW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Princenthal| Nancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Starr| Georgina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stingel| Rudolf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tracy Williams Ltd.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volk| Gregory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whitney Museum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zinsser| John]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://artcritical.com/?p=9639</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Rudolf Stingel at the Whitney, Raymond Pettibon at David Zwirner, Julie Heffernan at PPOW, Georgina Starr at Tracy Williams, and Ingrid Calame at James Cohan</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2007/10/12/review-panel-october-2007/">October 2007: Nancy Princenthal, Gregory Volk, and John Zinsser with moderator David Cohen</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>October 12, 2007 at the National Academy Museum and School of Fine Arts, New York</strong></p>
<p>[soundcloud url=&#8221;https://api.soundcloud.com/tracks/201583327&#8243; params=&#8221;color=ff5500&amp;auto_play=false&amp;hide_related=false&amp;show_comments=true&amp;show_user=true&amp;show_reposts=false&#8221; width=&#8221;100%&#8221; height=&#8221;166&#8243; iframe=&#8221;true&#8221; /]</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Nancy Princenthal, Gregory Volk, and John Zinsser joined David Cohen to review Rudolf Stingel at the Whitney, Raymond Pettibon at David Zwirner, Julie Heffernan at PPOW, Georgina Starr at Tracy Williams, and Ingrid Calame at James Cohan.</p>
<figure id="attachment_9646" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-9646" style="width: 324px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://artcritical.com/2007/10/12/review-panel-october-2007/starr/" rel="attachment wp-att-9646"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-9646" title="Georgina Starr, Death (after the Allegory of Vanity),  2007, Hand-painted plaster sculpture, Approx: 28 x 10 1/2 x 10 1/2 Inches" src="https://artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/starr.jpg" alt="Georgina Starr, Death (after the Allegory of Vanity),  2007, Hand-painted plaster sculpture, Approx: 28 x 10 1/2 x 10 1/2 Inches" width="324" height="432" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2010/08/starr.jpg 324w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2010/08/starr-275x367.jpg 275w" sizes="(max-width: 324px) 100vw, 324px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-9646" class="wp-caption-text">Georgina Starr, Death (after the Allegory of Vanity), 2007, Hand-painted plaster sculpture, Approx: 28 x 10 1/2 x 10 1/2 Inches</figcaption></figure>
<figure id="attachment_9647" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-9647" style="width: 500px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://artcritical.com/2007/10/12/review-panel-october-2007/stingel/" rel="attachment wp-att-9647"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-9647" title="Installation shot, Rudolf Stingel, 2007" src="https://artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/stingel.jpg" alt="Installation shot, Rudolf Stingel, 2007" width="500" height="333" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2010/08/stingel.jpg 500w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2010/08/stingel-300x199.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-9647" class="wp-caption-text">Installation shot, Rudolf Stingel, 2007</figcaption></figure>
<figure id="attachment_9640" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-9640" style="width: 500px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://artcritical.com/2007/10/12/review-panel-october-2007/calame/" rel="attachment wp-att-9640"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-9640 " title="Gallery view, Ingrid Calame, 2003, Courtesy James Cohan Gallery" src="https://artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/calame.jpg" alt="Gallery view, Ingrid Calame, 2003, Courtesy James Cohan Gallery" width="500" height="313" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2010/08/calame.jpg 500w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2010/08/calame-300x187.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-9640" class="wp-caption-text">Gallery view, Ingrid Calame, 2003, Courtesy James Cohan Gallery</figcaption></figure>
<figure id="attachment_9642" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-9642" style="width: 389px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://artcritical.com/2007/10/12/review-panel-october-2007/heffernan-2/" rel="attachment wp-att-9642"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-9642 " title="Julie Heffernan, Self Portrait with Men in Hats, 2007, Oil on canvas, Courtesy of PPOW Gallery" src="https://artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/heffernan1.jpg" alt="Julie Heffernan, Self Portrait with Men in Hats, 2007, Oil on canvas, Courtesy of PPOW Gallery" width="389" height="500" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2010/08/heffernan1.jpg 389w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2010/08/heffernan1-233x300.jpg 233w" sizes="(max-width: 389px) 100vw, 389px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-9642" class="wp-caption-text">Julie Heffernan, Self Portrait with Men in Hats, 2007, Oil on canvas, Courtesy of PPOW Gallery</figcaption></figure>
<figure id="attachment_9643" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-9643" style="width: 478px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://artcritical.com/2007/10/12/review-panel-october-2007/pettibone/" rel="attachment wp-att-9643"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-9643" title="Installation shot, Raymond Pettibon, 2007, Here's Your Irony Back (The Big Picture)" src="https://artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/pettibone.jpg" alt="Installation shot, Raymond Pettibon, 2007, Here's Your Irony Back (The Big Picture)" width="478" height="359" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2010/08/pettibone.jpg 478w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2010/08/pettibone-300x225.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 478px) 100vw, 478px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-9643" class="wp-caption-text">Installation shot, Raymond Pettibon, 2007, Here&#8217;s Your Irony Back (The Big Picture)</figcaption></figure>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2007/10/12/review-panel-october-2007/">October 2007: Nancy Princenthal, Gregory Volk, and John Zinsser with moderator David Cohen</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://artcritical.com/2007/10/12/review-panel-october-2007/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
