<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>street art &#8211; artcritical</title>
	<atom:link href="https://artcritical.com/tag/street-art/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://artcritical.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2015 04:21:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.5.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Notes from NOLA: Two Shows in New Orleans</title>
		<link>https://artcritical.com/2015/02/16/david-carrier-on-new-orleans/</link>
					<comments>https://artcritical.com/2015/02/16/david-carrier-on-new-orleans/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Carrier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2015 18:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Dispatches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Basquiat| Jean-Michel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carrier| David]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clark| Ed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaines| Charles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gauguin| Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graffiti]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Orleans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[painting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prospect Biennial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sirmans| Franklin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[street art]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.artcritical.com/?p=47069</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Two shows highlight the work of contemporary New Orleans artists and others connected to the city.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2015/02/16/david-carrier-on-new-orleans/">Notes from NOLA: Two Shows in New Orleans</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dispatch from New Orleans</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><em>Prospect.3: Notes for Now</em></strong></p>
<p>October 25, 2014 to January 25, 2015<br />
Various sites in New Orleans</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>ExhibitBe</strong><br />
Saturdays, November 15 to January 25, 2015<br />
3010 Sandra Drive, Algiers, New Orleans</p>
<figure id="attachment_47082" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-47082" style="width: 550px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/10952065_1572865512957848_6380059310922326567_n.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-47082" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/10952065_1572865512957848_6380059310922326567_n.jpg" alt="Installation view of ExhibitBe in New Orleans." width="550" height="179" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2015/02/10952065_1572865512957848_6380059310922326567_n.jpg 550w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2015/02/10952065_1572865512957848_6380059310922326567_n-275x90.jpg 275w" sizes="(max-width: 550px) 100vw, 550px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-47082" class="wp-caption-text">Panoramic installation view of ExhibitBe in New Orleans. Courtesy of ExhibitBe.</figcaption></figure>
<p>“Prospect.3: Notes for Now,” the third New Orleans biennial, curated by Franklin Sirmans, presented 58 artists and collaborations at 18 locations within that city. The New Orleans Museum of Art showed Paul Gauguin’s <em>Under the Pandanus</em> (1891), on loan from the Dallas Museum of Art; paintings and drawings by Brazilian artist Tarsila do Amaral; and handsome modernist abstractions by Ed Clark, a veteran local artist. At the Ogden Museum of Southern art was a gallery of large paintings by Jean-Michel Basquiat, who was involved with music from New Orleans — and he visited the city briefly. Also at the Ogden were photographs of the prisons in the Louisiana State Penitentiary, in nearby Angola; and colorful bas-reliefs by Herbert Singleton, who was incarnated in that prison. And three floors of the Contemporary Arts Center included displays of Manal Aldowayan’s photographs of female workers in her native country, Saudi Arabia and the grid-grounded paintings of McArthur Binion, which allude both to the history of that medium and to black political history. There were landscape photographs of Louisiana and Mississippi by Thomas Joshua Cooper; Charles Gaines’s LED panels presenting texts by African, Asian and European radicals and socialists; photographs of the Nigerian film industry by Pieter Hugo; and Yun-Fei Ji’s scroll, which uses a traditional format to present scenes of conflict in contemporary China.</p>
<figure id="attachment_47085" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-47085" style="width: 275px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/p.3_clark_3_copy-1413220940.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="wp-image-47085 size-medium" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/p.3_clark_3_copy-1413220940-275x341.jpg" alt="Ed Clark, New Orleans Series #4, 2012. Acrylic on canvas,  53 x 66 inches. Courtesy of the artist and Stella Jones Gallery, New Orleans." width="275" height="341" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2015/02/p.3_clark_3_copy-1413220940-275x341.jpg 275w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2015/02/p.3_clark_3_copy-1413220940.jpg 403w" sizes="(max-width: 275px) 100vw, 275px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-47085" class="wp-caption-text">Ed Clark, New Orleans Series #4, 2012. Acrylic on canvas, 53 x 66 inches. Courtesy of the artist and Stella Jones Gallery, New Orleans.</figcaption></figure>
<p>This show displayed some good local artists and, also, a full sampling of the sorts of installations, photography and videos that are fashionable in the present art world. It thus provides New Orleans residents and visitors an opportunity to learn about contemporary visual art. And the weighty, expensive catalogue provides a full visual record of the art on display, though the free newspaper map and guide published by <em>The New Orleans Advocate </em>is actually a more useful guide. The problem here was, quite simply, that while New Orleans has long been a literary and musical center, it hasn’t really been the home of very many well-known distinctive visual artists. When Sirmans justifies his inclusion of Gauguin on the grounds that he was a friend of Edgar Degas, who did visit the city, or of Amaral because of her interest in cultural diversity in her country, Brazil, one’s aware of this problem. The issues concerning class, gender and race faced by New Orleans, pressing concerns elsewhere, are dealt with in this Louisiana city in distinctive ways, which don’t get adequate critical analysis.</p>
<p>Stimulated, but a little frustrated by this ambitious exhibition, I drove South across the Mississippi River to ExhibitBe, an outdoor graffiti display in an unoccupied apartment complex just off of General De Gaulle Boulevard in Algiers. These five-story buildings, public low-cost housing (which is soon to be demolished to make way for a sports center) were the site for an outdoor display by 51 graffiti artists, curated by Brandan “B-mike” Odoms. On the first of these high walls was a pale green portrait of a woman by the Australian artist Rone. At the edge between the buildings Ana Hernandez and <a href="http://videos.nola.com/times-picayune/2012/12/artist_rontherin_ratliff_sculp.html">Rontherin Ratliff</a> wove plastic window blinds into the perforations of decorative concrete sunscreens to produce a pair of outstretched, three-story high hands in the form of plastic tapestry. On the next building is MEEK’s image of a Ferguson protestor tossing back a police tear gas canister. And Odum&#8217;s portrait shows a 15-year-old <a href="http://www.nola.com/crime/index.ssf/2014/10/teen_murder_victim_found_on_pi.html">George Carter, who was murdered in New Orleans,</a> staring from the fifth floor. On the two story building facing these apartments, B-mike painted black history icons — Gil Scott-Heron, Biggie Smalls, Harriet Tubman, Radio Raheem, Maya Angelou, Huey P. Newton, Fred Hampton, and Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. And there was more graffiti inside some of the condemned apartments.</p>
<figure id="attachment_47083" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-47083" style="width: 275px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/20141111-cac-jun-fei-ji-scroll02.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-medium wp-image-47083" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/20141111-cac-jun-fei-ji-scroll02-275x163.jpg" alt="Installation view of Yun-fei Ji in &quot;Prospect.3&quot; in New Orleans." width="275" height="163" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2015/02/20141111-cac-jun-fei-ji-scroll02-275x163.jpg 275w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2015/02/20141111-cac-jun-fei-ji-scroll02.jpg 550w" sizes="(max-width: 275px) 100vw, 275px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-47083" class="wp-caption-text">Installation view of Yun-fei Ji in &#8220;Prospect.3&#8221; in New Orleans.</figcaption></figure>
<p>“This is temporary,” a sign warned: “take a picture. It will last longer.” On a sunny warm day, this open-air, free-admission show attracted crowds — including a DJ and dancers. As always, of course, the moral ambiguities of gentrification are not easy to resolve — the exhibition was possible only thanks to the allowance of a property developer, who is destroying public housing. Acknowledging that problem, I would argue that ExhibitBe, more so than Prospect.3, provides an authentic, accessible record of the visual culture of New Orleans. Recently Joachim Pissarro and I have made the distinction between art-world art and “wild art,” such as graffiti, that is found outside of museums, a distinction which is illustrated perfectly in the contrast between these two very different exhibitions.</p>
<figure id="attachment_47081" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-47081" style="width: 275px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/10933885_422946417861405_1108201747440713602_n.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-medium wp-image-47081" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/10933885_422946417861405_1108201747440713602_n-275x183.jpg" alt="Brandan &quot;B-mike&quot; Odums at ExhibitBe, which he helped to organize." width="275" height="183" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2015/02/10933885_422946417861405_1108201747440713602_n-275x183.jpg 275w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2015/02/10933885_422946417861405_1108201747440713602_n.jpg 550w" sizes="(max-width: 275px) 100vw, 275px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-47081" class="wp-caption-text">Brandan &#8220;B-mike&#8221; Odums at ExhibitBe, which he helped to organize.</figcaption></figure>
<p>I owe thanks to my daughter Liz, who is a New Orleans resident, for taking me to this marvelous show, which I would never have discovered on my own.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2015/02/16/david-carrier-on-new-orleans/">Notes from NOLA: Two Shows in New Orleans</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://artcritical.com/2015/02/16/david-carrier-on-new-orleans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Be Wild and Obey: Shepard Fairey in Naples</title>
		<link>https://artcritical.com/2015/01/13/david-carrier-on-shepard-fairey/</link>
					<comments>https://artcritical.com/2015/01/13/david-carrier-on-shepard-fairey/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Carrier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2015 04:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carrier| David]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dispatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fairey| Shephard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Naples]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[street art]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.artcritical.com/?p=46130</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In the one neighborhood where there's little graffiti, a show of street art</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2015/01/13/david-carrier-on-shepard-fairey/">Be Wild and Obey: Shepard Fairey in Naples</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Report from&#8230; Naples</p>
<p>Shepard Fairey: #Obey at Palazzo delle Arti Naples (PAN)<br />
December 6, 2014 to February 28, 2015<br />
Via dei Mille, 60, 80121 Napoli, Italy</p>
<figure id="attachment_46131" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-46131" style="width: 550px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/fairey-obey.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-46131" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/fairey-obey.jpg" alt="publicity for the exhibition under review" width="550" height="366" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2015/01/fairey-obey.jpg 550w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2015/01/fairey-obey-275x183.jpg 275w" sizes="(max-width: 550px) 100vw, 550px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-46131" class="wp-caption-text">publicity for the exhibition under review</figcaption></figure>
<p>There is a vital distinction to be made between the kinds of works of art that are made to be shown in galleries and museums and what Joachim Pissarro and I have called “wild art” (in our 2013 book of that title from Phaidon Press), art that is initially presented outside this art world system. There is a great deal of wild art—for example, graffiti, tattoos and most of the art displayed in hotels and restaurants. But since in the contemporary art scene there is actually no significant difference in kind, besides location, between this wild art and art-world art, works of art can move between these two kinds of display sites. This distinction is important, however, because normally the art world—a system that relies upon exclusion to justify its aesthetic values—holds wild art at a distance. Occasionally, however, the distinction breaks down—and that is what has happened in this most instructive exhibition when Shepard Fairey’s graffiti was presented in a Neapolitan kunsthalle. The goal of what he calls his ongoing experiment in phenomenology, Fairey has explained, “is to reawaken a sense of wonder about one’s environment.” Thus his OBEY sticker attempts to stimulate curiosity and “bring people to question [&#8230;] their relationship with their surroundings.” He wishes to cause them “to consider the details and meanings of (these) surroundings. In the name of fun and observation,” a self-description that makes him sound like a modernist landscape painter or many other art museum artists.</p>
<figure id="attachment_46132" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-46132" style="width: 275px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/fairey-scam.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-medium wp-image-46132" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/fairey-scam-275x406.jpg" alt="Shepard Fairey, Uncle Scam, 2006.  Screenprint, 41 ? 29 inches, edition of 50.  Courtesy of the Artist" width="275" height="406" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2015/01/fairey-scam-275x406.jpg 275w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2015/01/fairey-scam.jpg 339w" sizes="(max-width: 275px) 100vw, 275px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-46132" class="wp-caption-text">Shepard Fairey, Uncle Scam, 2006. Screenprint, 41 x 29 inches, edition of 50. Courtesy of the Artist</figcaption></figure>
<p>This large-scale exhibition provided the welcome opportunity to trace Fairey’s stylistic development. In 1997 and 1998 he did images of Stalin, Mao, Lenin, with the politically ambiguous &#8220;Obey&#8221; logo attached, ironical takes on images of familiar leftist heroes. <em>Marylin Warhol </em>(2000) made an explicit allusion to art-world art, a procedure which didn’t really come off, however, as this image superimposing a depiction of Warhol on a Warholesque picture of Marilyn Monroe is weaker than Warhol’s own depictions of Monroe or himself. Fairey was more successful in <em>Malcolm X </em> (2006) and his screen prints, <em>Nixon Money</em>, <em>Mao Money</em>, <em>Lenin Money </em>(2003)—punchier images with a clear political impact, as he was in his <em>Uncle Scam </em>(2007), <em>Rise Above Cop </em>(2007) and, most especially <em>Two Sides of Capitalism: Good </em>and <em>Two Sides of Capitalism: Bad </em>(2007) which complicate his earlier concerns by juxtaposing words and images. He became internationally famous for the advertising image of Barack Obama for the 2008 presidential race, an image of which was acquired by the National Portrait Gallery, Washington, D.C. Thanks to his fame, he was invited to do beautifully decorative all-over red images of Angela Davis, Arab revolutionaries and <em>St. Mark’s Horses </em>for his show in Venice, 2009. The stunning mixed media collages <em>Eye Alert Cream </em>and <em>Eye Alert Red </em>(2010), close ups of faces with a dollar sign in the tear and a skull reflected in the eyeball, represent a new, richly suggestive development of his portraits.</p>
<p>Like any successful art world artist, Fairey has a developed personal style. His posters looked great in this site. Street artists normally seek one-off effects—you see their graffiti, and then stroll on. But when wild art moves into a gallery, it inevitably gets seen differently, in the context of an artist’s development and, also, in relation to that of contemporaries. Although a gifted designer of visually striking two-tone frontal images, Fairey’s development is relatively limited in formal terms, and yet the introduction by stages of more complex subjects makes for a visually rewarding retrospective. He has moved a long distance from his striking point. It was appropriate, surely, that I discovered the exhibition not through publicity in some art magazine or web site, but by seeing his ad in the streets. Open your eyes and you will discover that there’s a lot of wild art out there! Palazzo delle Arti is located in the upscale neighborhood of Chiaja, the one place in graffiti-filled Naples where little street art is found. “#Obey” reveals how art is transformed when wild art become art-world art. And so, now, as you can see from the upscale catalogue, his art is found in many private Italian collections.</p>
<figure id="attachment_46133" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-46133" style="width: 71px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/fairey-stmarkshorses.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-thumbnail wp-image-46133" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/fairey-stmarkshorses-71x71.jpg" alt="Shepard Fairey, St. Mark’s horses, 2009. Screenprint, 27-1/2 x 35-1/2 inches, edition of 250. Courtesy of the Artist" width="71" height="71" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2015/01/fairey-stmarkshorses-71x71.jpg 71w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2015/01/fairey-stmarkshorses-150x150.jpg 150w" sizes="(max-width: 71px) 100vw, 71px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-46133" class="wp-caption-text">click to enlarge</figcaption></figure>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2015/01/13/david-carrier-on-shepard-fairey/">Be Wild and Obey: Shepard Fairey in Naples</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://artcritical.com/2015/01/13/david-carrier-on-shepard-fairey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Waves: Swoon at the Brooklyn Museum</title>
		<link>https://artcritical.com/2014/07/07/swoon-at-brooklyn-musuem/</link>
					<comments>https://artcritical.com/2014/07/07/swoon-at-brooklyn-musuem/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Margaret Graham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2014 13:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[53rd Venice Biennale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brooklyn Museum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drawing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hurricane Sandy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[installation art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sculpture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[street art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Swoon]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.artcritical.com/?p=40726</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The acclaimed street artist creates an oceanic jungle in the Brooklyn Museum.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2014/07/07/swoon-at-brooklyn-musuem/">Waves: Swoon at the Brooklyn Museum</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Swoon: Submerged Motherlands</em> at the Brooklyn Museum<br />
April 11 to August 24, 2014<br />
200 Eastern Parkway (at Washington Ave.)<br />
Brooklyn, 718 638 5000</p>
<figure id="attachment_40731" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-40731" style="width: 550px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/S.SM6_.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-40731" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/S.SM6_.jpg" alt="Installation view, &quot;Swoon: Submerged Motherlands,&quot; 2014, the Brooklyn Museum. Courtesy of the artist and the Brooklyn Museum." width="550" height="367" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2014/07/S.SM6_.jpg 550w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2014/07/S.SM6_-275x183.jpg 275w" sizes="(max-width: 550px) 100vw, 550px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-40731" class="wp-caption-text">Installation view, &#8220;Swoon: Submerged Motherlands,&#8221; 2014, the Brooklyn Museum. Courtesy of the artist and the Brooklyn Museum.</figcaption></figure>
<p>With her installation at the Brooklyn Museum, entitled “Submerged Motherlands,” New York-based artist Swoon (Caledonia Curry) has come home in full force. For the better part of the last decade, Swoon has brought her particular brand of socially conscious and thoughtfully impermanent street art around the globe, from the banks of the Hudson to New Orleans to Venice to Haiti. Her creations, like a turn of phrase by poet Ann Lauterbach, powerfully convey “something in the mix of habit and hope.” They’re lavish yet down-to-earth, full of youthful dynamism and the fragility of time. Swoon combines found materials, expressionistic figure drawing and intricately detailed patterns on a grand scale, layering personal narrative and community crises into a dense, dramatic outpouring of lovingly curated objects. Of late, she has emerged alongside such artists as Ai Wei Wei and Shirin Neshat as a master of a kind of civic-minded, positively impactful art activism that is often as exquisite as it is challenging.</p>
<figure id="attachment_40729" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-40729" style="width: 275px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/S.SM2_.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="wp-image-40729 size-medium" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/S.SM2_-275x123.jpg" alt="Installation view, &quot;Swoon: Submerged Motherlands,&quot; 2014, the Brooklyn Museum. Courtesy of the artist and the Brooklyn Museum." width="275" height="123" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2014/07/S.SM2_-275x123.jpg 275w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2014/07/S.SM2_.jpg 550w" sizes="(max-width: 275px) 100vw, 275px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-40729" class="wp-caption-text">Installation view, &#8220;Swoon: Submerged Motherlands,&#8221; 2014, the Brooklyn Museum. Courtesy of the artist and the Brooklyn Museum.</figcaption></figure>
<p>“Submerged Motherlands” has engulfed the entire Iris and B. Gerald Cantor Gallery on the Museum’s fifth floor, transforming it into a dreamy ad hoc jungle village where the sea has crawled up to marry the land. An enormous tree stands tall at the center of the gallery’s rotunda, reaching gracefully up to the skylight, its limbs draped and dripping with delicate circular paper cutouts. Flanking the tree’s massive trunk — which is woven from long, vertical strips of fabric, each dyed a different muted tone — are two ragtag boats that the artist previously floated down the Mississippi River (in 2006), the Hudson River (2008) and into the Venice Bienniale (2009). Sets of mirrored cardboard figures radiate outward from the heart of the installation, looming large like sentinels or sphinxes, deities that bless and protect the space within. One is a pair of Incan mothers, arms outstretched as they gaze skyward, with matching crowns made of tentacles and breastplates of crabs’ legs; another couple resembles plump, seated Buddhas, each sporting a careworn grimace and a bandaged hand. Here, the mundane and discarded have been invigorated and made beautiful; waste has been turned to want.</p>
<figure id="attachment_40728" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-40728" style="width: 275px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/S.SM1_.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="wp-image-40728 size-medium" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/S.SM1_-275x183.jpg" alt="Installation view, &quot;Swoon: Submerged Motherlands,&quot; 2014, the Brooklyn Museum. Courtesy of the artist and the Brooklyn Museum." width="275" height="183" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2014/07/S.SM1_-275x183.jpg 275w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2014/07/S.SM1_.jpg 550w" sizes="(max-width: 275px) 100vw, 275px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-40728" class="wp-caption-text">Installation view, &#8220;Swoon: Submerged Motherlands,&#8221; 2014, the Brooklyn Museum. Courtesy of the artist and the Brooklyn Museum.</figcaption></figure>
<p>Everywhere the viewer looks there is something new to see: on the walls, the floors, the ceiling, in every nook and crevice. The forms are sundry and precise, and the textures and colors created by the play of light are splendid. According to the artist, the piece was conceived as a response to Hurricane Sandy, which struck the Atlantic Coast in 2012, and to the great tsunami that destroyed Doggerland, a landmass that once connected Great Britain and Europe, 8,000 years ago. References to the sea are pervasive: ornate mandalas and medallions made of thick lines sketched in marker on cardboard echo shells, aquatic plants and cephalopods, while the walls have been splashed with various jewel tones of blue. By fusing these maritime elements into the larger landlocked installation, Swoon rhythmically reiterates the simultaneous life-giving and life-threatening force of water, reminding us that the key to our existence and extinction lies curled in the crest of every wave. And while the artist’s style of mark making is decidedly street, embodying a frenetic sense of forward movement, the overall effect is calm, almost otherworldly, as though viewed from the quiet recesses of the ocean floor.</p>
<p>When faced with this magnanimous installation, one realizes the aptness of the artist’s pseudonym: Swoon. It is little wonder that standing in this space evokes a rush of emotion, like falling in love or the flush before a faint. There is a sense of safety, but no comfort, for to swoon is the body&#8217;s defense against perilous circumstance — extreme heat, fear, or fever, say — the moment when consciousness becomes too much to bear.&#8221;Submerged Motherlands&#8221; feels like the moment <em>before</em> that moment, or perhaps the one just after, when delirium sets in and sends the mind reeling, everything at once impossibly fuzzy and terribly clear. You focus on a single spot at the core of your vision while mirror images bloom along the periphery. Shapes and shadows swirl and flutter, multiplying and expanding until all dissolves into the unknown.</p>
<p>On a more literal note, the installation is also meant to be a memorial to the artist’s mother, who became ill and passed away during the gestation phase of the project. Swoon is very aware of her loss, and that awareness (and wariness) presses her toward an intimate way of making art that both embraces and cautions the viewer. Every aspect of the installation feels personal, and poised just so, as though it could collapse at any moment. Like a site-specific sculpture by Sarah Sze, the work is elaborate and immense but also vulnerable, forever on the verge of falling apart. In it, ideas of shelter and exposure, past and future, life and death are folded together into the very real, often difficult, often lovely median state where we live. The figure of a mother breast-feeding her child, or a skeletal woman whose bones are wrapped around the artist’s self-portrait are enough to convince this critic of the integrity of Swoon’s means, whatever (and whenever) the end.</p>
<figure id="attachment_40733" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-40733" style="width: 71px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/S.SM11.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-thumbnail wp-image-40733" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/S.SM11-71x71.jpg" alt="Installation view, &quot;Swoon: Submerged Motherlands,&quot; 2014, the Brooklyn Museum. Courtesy of the artist and the Brooklyn Museum." width="71" height="71" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-40733" class="wp-caption-text">click to enlarge</figcaption></figure>
<figure id="attachment_40730" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-40730" style="width: 71px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/S.SM5_.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-thumbnail wp-image-40730" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/S.SM5_-71x71.jpg" alt="Installation view, &quot;Swoon: Submerged Motherlands,&quot; 2014, the Brooklyn Museum. Courtesy of the artist and the Brooklyn Museum." width="71" height="71" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-40730" class="wp-caption-text">click to enlarge</figcaption></figure>
<figure id="attachment_40727" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-40727" style="width: 71px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/S.SM_.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-thumbnail wp-image-40727" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/S.SM_-71x71.jpg" alt="Installation view, &quot;Swoon: Submerged Motherlands,&quot; 2014, the Brooklyn Museum. Courtesy of the artist and the Brooklyn Museum." width="71" height="71" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-40727" class="wp-caption-text">click to enlarge</figcaption></figure>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2014/07/07/swoon-at-brooklyn-musuem/">Waves: Swoon at the Brooklyn Museum</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://artcritical.com/2014/07/07/swoon-at-brooklyn-musuem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Radical Bodies at Grey Art Gallery</title>
		<link>https://artcritical.com/2013/10/25/radical-presence-grey-art-gallery/</link>
					<comments>https://artcritical.com/2013/10/25/radical-presence-grey-art-gallery/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maddie Phinney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2013 04:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Exhibitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cassel Oliver| Valerie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fluxus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fusco| Coco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grey Art Gallery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hammons| David]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jones| Amelia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patterson| Benjamin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Piper| Adrian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pope L| William]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ramellzee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[street art]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.artcritical.com/?p=35576</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A two-part exhibition tells the story of black performance art in the 20th century</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2013/10/25/radical-presence-grey-art-gallery/">Radical Bodies at Grey Art Gallery</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1></h1>
<h1></h1>
<p><em>Radical Presence: Black Performance in Contemporary Art</em></p>
<p>Grey Art Gallery, NYU<br />
September 10 to December 7, 2013<br />
100 Washington Square East<br />
New York City, 212-998-6780</p>
<p>Part two of <em>Radical Presence: Black Performance in Contemporary Art</em><strong> </strong>will open November 14 at the Studio Museum in Harlem, and will remain on view until March 9, 2014.</p>
<figure id="attachment_35589" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-35589" style="width: 600px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/5_PopeL_EatingWSJ_2000_72dpi_3000pixwide.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-35589 " title="Pope L. performing Eating the Wall Street Journal (2000) at The Sculpture Center, New York, 2000. Courtesy of the artist. Photo: Lydia Grey. Installation on view at Grey Art Gallery, NYU." src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/5_PopeL_EatingWSJ_2000_72dpi_3000pixwide.jpg" alt="Pope L. performing Eating the Wall Street Journal (2000) at The Sculpture Center, New York, 2000. Courtesy of the artist. Photo: Lydia Grey. Installation on view at Grey Art Gallery, NYU." width="600" height="399" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2013/10/5_PopeL_EatingWSJ_2000_72dpi_3000pixwide.jpg 600w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2013/10/5_PopeL_EatingWSJ_2000_72dpi_3000pixwide-275x182.jpg 275w" sizes="(max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-35589" class="wp-caption-text">Pope L. performing Eating the Wall Street Journal (2000) at The Sculpture Center, New York, 2000. Courtesy of the artist. Photo: Lydia Grey. Installation on view at Grey Art Gallery, NYU.</figcaption></figure>
<p>The ambitious two-part survey <em>Radical Presence</em>, originally organized by Valerie Cassel Oliver for the Contemporary Arts Museum Houston, is a thrilling endeavor.  The exhibition showcases 50 years of performance by black artists, with two dozen artists featured in the first installment on view at Grey Art Gallery.  According to the gallery’s director Lynn Gumpert, this portion of the show will be the more historical of the two, with a selection of contemporary works to open at the Studio Museum in Harlem next month.  It was inspiring to see a show entirely devoted to black artists in performance, one which exhibits Cassel Oliver’s deep investment in tracing a historical lineage for artists of color outside the modernist fabric of aesthetic judgments or the strategies of production central to postmodern cultural critique. The exhibition will be accompanied by more than a dozen live performances during its run. However, it is the historical evidence of these works—the document, the artifact, the object—which are central to the installation, forming a new heredity of black performance rooted in the subjective experience of viewing.</p>
<p>Cassel Oliver’s mission to find historical precedents (ie generational links) for artists of color is readable through her installation, which places canonized performances (Adrian Piper and David Hammons) next to lesser known ones.  <em>Radical Presence</em> presents black performance art not as an extension of theater—a medium rooted in visual passivity—but rather in terms of body art practices that illustrate questions of racial difference by actually <em>enacting</em> this difference through its relationship to the body of the viewer.  One such artist is the brilliant Pope.L, whose work <em>Eating the Wall Street Journal</em> (2000) occupies a prominent place in the exhibition.  The installation consists of a toilet mounted on a 10-foot tower where Pope.L originally sat for several days, dressed in a jockstrap and caked in flour, reading pages from the <em>Wall Street Journal</em> before consuming and eventually purging them.  The wall text quotes the artist who writes, “I am a fisherman of social absurdity, if you will&#8230;. My focus is to politicize disenfranchisement &#8230; to reinvent what’s beneath us, to remind us where we all come from.”  His crawl pieces, a project he began in the 1970s, also display the politics of embodiment and social history.  For <em>The Great White Way</em>, Pope.L crawled down 22 miles of Broadway in New York, making himself horizontal against the pavement amidst a capitalist jungle of high-rises and industry.  For this work he donned a capeless superman costume—an appropriated illusion of (white) strength, historically unavailable to him.  These works engage a cross-cultural conversation: why is it that we conceive of whiteness as somehow separate from blackness when one relies on the other for signification?  Rather than seeing either culture as “authentic” or segregated, Pope.L’s work performs the ways in which binary social structures are in fact deeply imbricated in one another.</p>
<figure id="attachment_35591" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-35591" style="width: 322px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/2_PapoColo_Superman51_1977.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class=" wp-image-35591   " title="Papo Colo, Superman 51,1977 (video still), VHS transferred to digital video, black and white, silentTRT 4:08 min. Courtesy of the artist. Video on view at both venues." src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/2_PapoColo_Superman51_1977.jpg" alt="Papo Colo, Superman 51,1977 (video still), VHS transferred to digital video, black and white, silentTRT 4:08 min. Courtesy of the artist. Video on view at both venues." width="322" height="437" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2013/10/2_PapoColo_Superman51_1977.jpg 442w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2013/10/2_PapoColo_Superman51_1977-275x373.jpg 275w" sizes="(max-width: 322px) 100vw, 322px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-35591" class="wp-caption-text">Papo Colo, Superman 51,1977 (video still), VHS transferred to digital video, black and white, silentTRT 4:08 min. Courtesy of the artist. Video on view at both venues.</figcaption></figure>
<p>Coco Fusco is another artist interested in our preconceptions of “the other.”  She is perhaps most well-known for her 1992 collaboration with Guillermo Gomez-Peña in <em>The Year of the White Bear and Two Undiscovered Amerindians Visit the West</em> (1992–1994), which traveled widely and remains the archetype for contemporary questions of colonization, the aesthetic of primitivism and the very function of the museum.  Fusco’s <em>Sightings Photo Series</em> from 2004 continues her examination of the role and responsibility of the viewer.  The work came out of her video project <em>In her video a/k/a Mrs. George Gilbert </em>(2004) in which Fusco weaves together archival video and staged surveillance footage of the FBI search for Angela Davis.  In a portion of the video Fusco narrates “Some women began to fear that an afro had become a one-way ticket to a holding cell, other women decided to put on afro wigs to pass for black.”  During the FBI search, hundreds of black women were wrongly detained or arrested before Davis herself was brought to trial.  What then does it mean when white women appropriate this righteous black <em>aesthetic</em> without any potential for misidentification and thus no actual bodily risk?  This notion of “passing” is something that Adrian Piper commented on extensively early on in her career—a question that is rooted in the experience of the seer as opposed to that of the subject.</p>
<p>Benjamin Patterson’s 1962 work<strong> </strong><em>Pond</em> is on display as a series of instructions for performers to produce an indeterminate work.  The open action is guided by a grid designed by Patterson, as well as a number of wind-up frogs that direct the participant’s movements.  In the exhibition catalog Cassel Oliver notes that it was actually an investigation into Patterson’s career that prompted her to begin researching work for <em>Radical Presence</em>.  Patterson, a classically trained musician, was one of the founding members of Fluxus yet remained largely absent from canonical discourse, that is, up until Cassel Oliver organized his retrospective at the Contemporary Arts Museum Houston. The Fluxus preoccupations with destabilizing hierarchies through chance operations and the group’s emphasis on the phenomenological (and thus subjective) experience of the viewer is very much in line with the more provocative works in <em>Radical Presence</em>.</p>
<figure id="attachment_35597" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-35597" style="width: 287px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/7_Hancock_Devotion_2013.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class=" wp-image-35597  " title="Trenton Doyle Hancock performing Devotion (2013) at the Contemporary Arts Museum Houston, January 31, 2013. Courtesy of the artist and the Contemporary Arts Museum Houston. Photo: Max Fields. To be performed at Grey Art Gallery, NYU on November 7, 2013." src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/7_Hancock_Devotion_2013.jpg" alt="Trenton Doyle Hancock performing Devotion (2013) at the Contemporary Arts Museum Houston, January 31, 2013. Courtesy of the artist and the Contemporary Arts Museum Houston. Photo: Max Fields. To be performed at Grey Art Gallery, NYU on November 7, 2013." width="287" height="432" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2013/10/7_Hancock_Devotion_2013.jpg 399w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2013/10/7_Hancock_Devotion_2013-275x413.jpg 275w" sizes="(max-width: 287px) 100vw, 287px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-35597" class="wp-caption-text">Trenton Doyle Hancock performing Devotion (2013) at the Contemporary Arts Museum Houston, January 31, 2013. Courtesy of the artist and the Contemporary Arts Museum Houston. Photo: Max Fields. To be performed at Grey Art Gallery, NYU on November 7, 2013.</figcaption></figure>
<p>The artist Rammellzee (1960-2010) also comes from a musical background.  Known for his elaborate performance costumes and narratives, he became famous in the 1980s New York underground through his freestyle rapping and graffiti tags in the subway.  A photograph on display at Grey Art Gallery features a selection of his elaborate costumes, as the original garments were installed as part of the exhibition in Houston.  Also on view is his 1979 document<strong>, </strong><em>Iconic Treatise on Gothic Futurism</em>.  In this treatise, Rammellzee speaks to the political power of language, in particular letters, which, when separated from their narrative function can become powerful weapons that work in opposition to what he calls “counterfeit linguistic systems.”  He was directly inspired by monastic traditions and illuminated manuscripts, in which letters serve both a literary and formal function.  Interestingly, the wall text glossed over Rammellzee’s sci-fi, urban shaman persona; like Jean-Michel Basquiat and Keith Haring, he began as an artist by using the city’s walls as his drawing board.</p>
<p>The art historian and performance art theorist Amelia Jones notes the power of body art, as enacted by the non-normative subject, to expose the naturalized exclusionism in modern art history.  The works in <em>Radical Presence</em> hinge on elements of social construction, intersections of race, gender, and sexuality, and the idiosyncratic relationship between seer and seen. This is art that challenges not only the structure of the art institution, but also makes an indelible impact on the social structures beyond the gallery’s walls: Radical, indeed.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<figure id="attachment_35596" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-35596" style="width: 71px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/3b_Senga-Nengudi_RSVP_1978_2.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-thumbnail wp-image-35596 " title="Senga Nengudi, Performance Piece, 1978 (performed by Maren Hassinger), Gelatin silver print, 31 1/2  x 40 in. Courtesy of the artist and Thomas Erben Gallery, New York. Photo: Harmon Outlaw." src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/3b_Senga-Nengudi_RSVP_1978_2-71x71.jpg" alt="Senga Nengudi, Performance Piece, 1978 (performed by Maren Hassinger), Gelatin silver print, 31 1/2  x 40 in. Courtesy of the artist and Thomas Erben Gallery, New York. Photo: Harmon Outlaw." width="71" height="71" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2013/10/3b_Senga-Nengudi_RSVP_1978_2-71x71.jpg 71w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2013/10/3b_Senga-Nengudi_RSVP_1978_2-150x150.jpg 150w" sizes="(max-width: 71px) 100vw, 71px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-35596" class="wp-caption-text">click to enlarge</figcaption></figure>
<figure id="attachment_35600" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-35600" style="width: 71px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/1_Hammons_Spade_1969.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-thumbnail wp-image-35600 " title="David Hammons, Spade (Power to the Spade),1969, Body print, pigment, and mixed media on paper, 53 1/4 x 35 1/4 inches. Collection of Jack and Connie Tilton, New York. On view at Grey Art Gallery, NYU." src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/1_Hammons_Spade_1969-71x71.jpg" alt="David Hammons, Spade (Power to the Spade),1969, Body print, pigment, and mixed media on paper, 53 1/4 x 35 1/4 inches. Collection of Jack and Connie Tilton, New York. On view at Grey Art Gallery, NYU." width="71" height="71" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-35600" class="wp-caption-text">click to enlarge</figcaption></figure>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2013/10/25/radical-presence-grey-art-gallery/">Radical Bodies at Grey Art Gallery</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://artcritical.com/2013/10/25/radical-presence-grey-art-gallery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
