<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Trosch| Thomas &#8211; artcritical</title>
	<atom:link href="https://artcritical.com/tag/trosch-thomas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://artcritical.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2017 07:53:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.5.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>All Our Blurbs from Art Fair Week, March 2017</title>
		<link>https://artcritical.com/2017/03/09/blurbs-art-fair-week-march-2017/</link>
					<comments>https://artcritical.com/2017/03/09/blurbs-art-fair-week-march-2017/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[THE EDITORS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2017 07:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Art Fairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bartos| Elena]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dorland| Chris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goodman| Brenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardinger| Ruth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kincheloe| Megan Liu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Larsen| Mernet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Løffler| Ervin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metz| Landon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pinder| Jefferson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Studio Zurcher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tompkins| Betty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trosch| Thomas]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.artcritical.com?p=66541&#038;preview_id=66541</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Capsule reviews by David Cohen and Roman Kalinovski from the commercial front lines </p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2017/03/09/blurbs-art-fair-week-march-2017/">All Our Blurbs from Art Fair Week, March 2017</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Monday, February 27: Salon Zürcher at Zurcher Gallery, 33 Bleecker Street</strong></p>
<figure id="attachment_66113" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-66113" style="width: 550px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/unnamed.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-66113"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-66113" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/unnamed-e1489043928821.jpg" alt="Installation shot, Zurcher Salon, featuring Inna Art Space of Hangzhou, China" width="550" height="413" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-66113" class="wp-caption-text">Installation shot, Zurcher Salon, featuring Inna Art Space of Hangzhou, China</figcaption></figure>
<p>Salon Zürcher is to fair weeks what New Hampshire is to primary elections. Armory Week 2017 kicks off Monday with the 16th edition of this boutique fair, an early bird special that hands the keys to Zürcher’s Bleecker Street premises to six galleries from Paris, Brussels, Oslo, Provincetown (MA) and Hangzhou, China, whose Inna Art Space’s booth is pictured here.</p>
<p><strong>Tuesday, February 28: Moving Image New York at <a href="http://www.icontact-archive.com/I0k5-GqgMSl17qCxO51T9Rpm5yrqlxG_?w=3">The Tunnel</a>, 269 11th Avenue</strong></p>
<figure id="attachment_66544" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-66544" style="width: 550px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/unnamed-1-e1488308870914.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-66544"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-66544" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/unnamed-1-e1488308870914.jpg" alt="Jefferson Pinder’s Afro-Cosmonaut/Alien (White Noise" width="550" height="458" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-66544" class="wp-caption-text">Jefferson Pinder’s Afro-Cosmonaut/Alien (White Noise)</figcaption></figure>
<p>Jefferson Pinder’s Afro-Cosmonaut/Alien (White Noise) is, according to his gallery, Curator’s Office of Bathesda, Md., “an escapist video narrative that ends in destruction when the protagonist plummets back to Earth after a mystical space journey. Like the doomed Icarus of Ancient Greek myth, the epic fall comes after reaching a brilliant zenith that is both mesmerizing and lethal. This white-faced Butoh-inspired performance is a crude metaphor of the civil rights legacy. Taking cues from experimental films, Pinder plants himself within the work, asking the viewers to watch the images of propulsion and power.”</p>
<p><strong>Wednesday, March 1: Spring/Break Art Show, 4 Times Square</strong></p>
<figure id="attachment_66221" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-66221" style="width: 384px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Kincheloe_Dice.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-66221"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-66221" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Kincheloe_Dice.jpg" alt="Megan Liu Kincheloe, Dice, 2017" width="384" height="500" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2017/02/Kincheloe_Dice.jpg 384w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2017/02/Kincheloe_Dice-275x358.jpg 275w" sizes="(max-width: 384px) 100vw, 384px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-66221" class="wp-caption-text">Megan Liu Kincheloe, Dice, 2017</figcaption></figure>
<p>Spring/Break was the most anarchic and exuberant of the fairs back in the days when it was staged in the old USPS administrative offices – a David Lynch-like time-capsule of New Deal bureacracy. Now Spring/Break has been given a break in the form of two floors of a glass and steel high-rise 22 stories above Times Square. But there is no corresponding corporateness in the resulting display. The organizing principle remains: each room has its own curators who sometimes include the exhibiting artists themselves. It was gratifying for artcritical to see some of its own writers among the curators. Eric Sutphin, for instance, has brought together an inspired coupling of New York School painter Rosemarie Beck, who was active from the 1950s onwards with classically sourced, abstractly composed multi-figure compositions, and contemporary mannerist, Angela Dufresne, with her swirling, voluptuous, cinematic scenes. Each display has a neat little office of its own, with spectacular views of the midtown skyline. Too spectacular, sometimes, as it can overwhelm what’s on view. Inspired, therefore, was the decision to hang works in the blinds-drawn windows in one mini show, Thing Gap Method, selected by artcritical writer Megan Liu Kincheloe and featuring Sophia Flood, Sascha Ingber, Kelly McCafferty, Sarah Tortora and Kincheloe herself, whose Dice (2017) is pictured here. DAVID COHEN</p>
<p><strong>Thursday, March 2: The Armory Show at Piers 92 &amp; 94</strong></p>
<figure id="attachment_66543" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-66543" style="width: 550px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/trosch.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-66543"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-66543" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/trosch.jpg" alt="Thomas Trosch, One Day in the Life of Lovely Mars, 2008, Oil and encaustic on canvas on wood panel, 44 × 50 inches. Courtesy of the Artist and Fredericks &amp; Freiser, NY" width="550" height="482" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2017/02/trosch.jpg 550w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2017/02/trosch-275x241.jpg 275w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2017/02/trosch-370x324.jpg 370w" sizes="(max-width: 550px) 100vw, 550px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-66543" class="wp-caption-text">Thomas Trosch, One Day in the Life of Lovely Mars, 2008, Oil and encaustic on canvas on wood panel, 44 × 50 inches. Courtesy of the Artist and Fredericks &amp; Freiser, NY</figcaption></figure>
<p>It’s a good year for texture. Well, so is any year probably, and a good year for anything else if all you want to do is scatter evidence for some such glib hunch amidst the labyrinth that is the city’s biggest art fair, conceptual bread crumbs, so to speak, to trace your way back to the front door. But as the first piece to grab my eye was a fabric work by Jayson Musson at Philadelphia’s Fleisher-Ollman texture became my trail. Next stop, a cunningly camp “salon” for Florine Stettheimer, presented by Jeffrey Deitch, showing latter-day acolytes of the society heiress pioneer of the American avant garde where a 1990s shlock horror wedding cake of impasto by the unjustly forgotten Thomas Trosch abstractly emulated Florine’s Harlem beach scene that presides over the display. From there it was texture everywhere, whether the geological encrustations of Bosco Sodi, preponderant in the fair and to be seen, for instance, at Galeria Hilario Galguera of Mexico City, Blain Southern and Paul Kasmin; the very 1950s-looking sculpted netted grids of Michelle Grabner at James Cohan; or the painterly reliefs of Miguel Barcelo at Thaddeus Ropac. The tactility can even manifest vicariously, as in the Vik Muniz Isis print of a strangely mottled version of Picasso’s The Dreamer, at Edwin Houk. Haptic experiences grounded the gaze amidst the accelerating flow of spectacle. DAVID COHEN</p>
<p><strong>Featured item from The Armory Show 2017: Mernet Larsen at Various Small Fires</strong></p>
<figure id="attachment_66256" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-66256" style="width: 550px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/larsen-cover-e1488550458541.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-66256"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-66256" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/larsen-cover-e1488550458541.jpg" alt="Mernet Larsen, Faculty Meeting with Wendy, 2006. Acrylic on Bristol paper, 21 × 26 inches." width="550" height="447" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2017/03/larsen-cover-e1488550458541.jpg 550w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2017/03/larsen-cover-e1488550458541-275x224.jpg 275w" sizes="(max-width: 550px) 100vw, 550px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-66256" class="wp-caption-text">Mernet Larsen, Faculty Meeting with Wendy, 2006. Acrylic on Bristol paper, 21 × 26 inches.</figcaption></figure>
<p>Various Small Fires, the Los Angeles gallery, has a solo show of preparatory sketches by Tampa, Florida-based painter Mernet Larsen in the Presents section of The Armory Show 2017. Larsen, who also has a work on view at James Cohan Gallery’s booth at the same fair, has only recently come into her own since retiring from a distinguished career in art education, memories of which pervade her frequent return to the motif of the faculty meeting. Rooted in an earlier abstract practice as well as explorations of Japanese prints, Larsen’s jocular imagery thinly disguises her fascination with unconventional perspective systems. She pursues radical spatial solutions that eschew conventional single-point perspective in favor of parallel perspective, reverse perspective and eccentric, seemingly improvised but in fact rigorous fusions of different systems within the same work. By destabilizing the location of the viewer, sometimes indeed to the point of inducing vertigo, she forces us to know, rather than merely see, the situation. DAVID COHEN</p>
<p><strong>Friday, March 3: VOLTA NY at Pier 90, 12th Avenue @ 50th Street<a href="http://ny.voltashow.com/about/"><br />
</a></strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<figure id="attachment_66285" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-66285" style="width: 333px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/17098070_10209953352523442_2650906123601025991_o-e1488570891436.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-66285"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-66285" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/17098070_10209953352523442_2650906123601025991_o-e1488570891436.jpg" alt="Works by Ruth Hardinger presented at Volta by David &amp; Scheweitzer " width="333" height="500" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-66285" class="wp-caption-text">Works by Ruth Hardinger presented at Volta by David &amp; Scheweitzer Contemporary</figcaption></figure>
<p>Ruth Hardinger’s striking Volta display at David&amp;Scheweitzer Contemporary draws together disparate forces: the artist’s passionate environmental activism, her longstanding affinity with Mesoamerican culture, and historically informed, critically sharpened investigations of working methods. These are all felt in works such works as Bundle of Rights, a sculpture in plaster and rope, and Reading the Clouds, a tapestry collaboration with Mexican weavers, seen at the Piers. Meanwhile, back at the rancheros, that is to say 56 Bogart Street, the same gallery presents an ongoing retrospective overview of Hardinger work in different media. There are tapestries, a calendar, hanging works in paper and assembled sculptures. Obsessive-compulsive minimalist hatch drawings worked on varyingly rough and smooth surfaces are installed in a grid that conforms to the Golden Rule. Dating from the 1970s, this work manages to resonate with a recent, altogether more robust and spontaneous cast concrete and found slate sculptural arrangement. What binds these efforts across the decades is the humble yet inventive presentness of their maker. DAVID COHEN</p>
<p><strong>Saturday, March 4: The Art Show at Park Avenue Armory, 643 Park Avenue @ 66th Street</strong></p>
<figure id="attachment_66338" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-66338" style="width: 345px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/censored_grid.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-66338"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-66338" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/censored_grid.jpg" alt="A work by Betty Tompkins presented by PPOW at The Art Show" width="345" height="469" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2017/02/censored_grid.jpg 345w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2017/02/censored_grid-275x374.jpg 275w" sizes="(max-width: 345px) 100vw, 345px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-66338" class="wp-caption-text">A work by Betty Tompkins presented by PPOW at The Art Show</figcaption></figure>
<p>The New York art fair scene can be confusing to the uninitiated: the most prominent fair, The Armory Show, takes place at a convention center on the Hudson while the Park Avenue Armory hosts an unrelated fair of its own, The Art Show by the Art Dealer&#8217;s Association of America. The work shown in the actual armory tends to be more conservative than the offerings of most of the other fairs, but there can be some surprises. PPOW&#8217;s booth this year is devoted to the work of Betty Tompkins, an artist who has been painting portraits of the pudendum for over forty years. Today she is best known for her colossal coital canvases, but her smaller works on paper, such as &#8220;Censored Grid #1&#8221; from 1974, provide a more intimate view of an intimate act. ROMAN KALINOVSKI</p>
<p><strong>Independent (Art Fair) at <a href="http://independenthq.com/2017/new-york/">Spring Studios</a>, 50 Varick Street</strong></p>
<figure id="attachment_66337" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-66337" style="width: 500px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/independent.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-66337"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-66337" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/independent.jpg" alt="Works by Ervin Løffler and Landon Metz presented at Independent by Oslo gallery VI, VII" width="500" height="333" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2017/02/independent.jpg 500w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2017/02/independent-275x183.jpg 275w" sizes="(max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-66337" class="wp-caption-text">Works by Ervin Løffler and Landon Metz presented at Independent by Oslo gallery VI, VII</figcaption></figure>
<p>Memo to Independent Art Fair, organizers and exhibitors alike: Enough already, put up some labels.</p>
<p>In the early days of the Basel Art Fair (the real one, in Basel, Switzerland) galleries would get an official reprimand from the all-powerful committee if the labels didn’t include prices. Dealers complained that having to ask was an icebreaker with collectors. But to have to ask who the artist is – never mind the title, medium, date? This is elitist, pretentious and anti-intellectual. To the innocent “general public” this says, this isn’t for you folks. To professionals it is impertinent and irritating, putting one in the humiliating position of asking when you half-know and gobbling up precious time in doing so. For new, unknown artists with foreign names it is a total downer: who is going to remember it, next time? And for collectors, having to beg for basic information has all the novelty and subtlety of a robo-telecall.</p>
<p>Despite this mishegas. Independent is still one of the most pleasing visitor experiences, thanks in no small measure to the gorgeous venue. My epiphanies on this visit were mostly three-dimensional for some reason: Beverly Buchanan’s shack constructions at Andrew Edlin; a bafflingly kinky saddle mounted on a scaffold “horse” by Magali Reus at London’s Approach; and a dynamically voluptuous bronze by the late Hungarian-born Norwegian sculptor Ervin Løffler, exquisitely installed by Oslo gallery VI, VII with works in dye on canvas by young New Yorker Landon Metz (Photo: Sebastiano Pellion) DAVID COHEN</p>
<p><strong>Sunday, March 5: NADA New York at Skylight Clarkson North, 572 Washington Street</strong></p>
<figure id="attachment_66351" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-66351" style="width: 337px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Screen-Shot-2017-03-05-at-12.18.08-PM-e1488735579721.png" rel="attachment wp-att-66351"><img loading="lazy" class=" wp-image-66351" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Screen-Shot-2017-03-05-at-12.18.08-PM-e1488735579721.png" alt="Brenda Goodman, Lament, 2016. Oil on panel, 36 x 30 inches" width="337" height="432" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-66351" class="wp-caption-text">Brenda Goodman, Lament, 2016. Oil on panel, 36 x 30 inches</figcaption></figure>
<p>A work by Brenda Goodman presented by Jeff Bailey at NADA, the New Art Dealers Association, 2017 fair. NADA was founded in 2002, launching its first fair that year in Miami. This year sees some changes in its New York outing: the time slot has switched from Frieze Week to Armory Week, and they have a new venue in west Soho. In tune with the self-styled progressive profile of the association, half of ticket sales are to be donated to the ACLU. DAVID COHEN</p>
<figure id="attachment_66352" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-66352" style="width: 323px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/16995985_468843366573195_3544132708151513781_n-e1489044710472.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-66352"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-66352" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/16995985_468843366573195_3544132708151513781_n-e1489044710472.jpg" alt="A digital print by Chris Dorland presented at NADA by Super Dakota Gallery from Brussels" width="323" height="500" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-66352" class="wp-caption-text">A digital print by Chris Dorland presented at NADA by Super Dakota Gallery from Brussels</figcaption></figure>
<p>This year&#8217;s iteration of the NADA fair was probably the most visually exhausting of the art fair week group, with dozens of galleries competing for attention in micro-booths that barely allowed one person to stand comfortably inside. Most of the galleries were from around New York but there were some international standouts, such as a selection of digital prints by Chris Dorland, courtesy of Super Dakota gallery from Brussels. Dorland&#8217;s glitchy work, made using a broken scanner and printed on eight foot tall aluminum panels, offered something monumental and digital in a fair that leaned towards the modest and traditional. Pictured: Untitled (corporate cannibal), 2017. ROMAN KALINOVSKI</p>
<p><strong>Monday, March 6: Spring/Break Art Show, 4 Times Square</strong></p>
<figure id="attachment_66424" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-66424" style="width: 511px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/unnamed-1-1-e1489044829926.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-66424"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-66424" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/unnamed-1-1-e1489044829926.jpg" alt="A work from the Family Portrait series by Aneta Bartos, presented at Spring/Break" width="511" height="500" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-66424" class="wp-caption-text">A work from the Family Portrait series by Aneta Bartos, presented at Spring/Break</figcaption></figure>
<p>As befits the most youthful of the fairs, Spring/Break has an extra 24 hours of energy and determination than the others: it is the one fair in Fair Week that makes it to the Monday of the next. And here is an artist who knows how to capture zest. Aneta Bartos, whose dad Zbigniew Bartos has a lifetime of competitive bodybuilding behind him. Naturally, it was to her that he would turn, aged 68, to capture his musculature in its last glory. A room of buff, nicely toned father-daughter photographs takes home trophies for audacity and composure. DAVID COHEN</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2017/03/09/blurbs-art-fair-week-march-2017/">All Our Blurbs from Art Fair Week, March 2017</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://artcritical.com/2017/03/09/blurbs-art-fair-week-march-2017/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Elizabeth Huey at Feigen Contemporary, Hilary Harkness at Mary Boone, Thomas Trosch at Fredericks Freiser</title>
		<link>https://artcritical.com/2005/05/12/gallery-going-a-version-of-this-article-first-appeared-in-the-new-york-sun-may-2005/</link>
					<comments>https://artcritical.com/2005/05/12/gallery-going-a-version-of-this-article-first-appeared-in-the-new-york-sun-may-2005/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Cohen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2005 18:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Exhibitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feigen Contemporary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fredericks & Freiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harkness| Hilary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Huey| Elizabeth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mary Boone Gallery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trosch| Thomas]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://testingartcritical.com/?p=2740</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Elizabeth Huey through May 28 at Feigen Contemporary, 535 W 20th Street, between 10th and 11th Avenues, 212-929-0500. Hilary Harkness through June 25 at Mary Boone, 745 Fifth Avenue at 57th Street, 212-752-2929. Thomas Trosch through June 10 at Fredericks Freiser, 504 W 22nd Street between 10th and 11th Avenues, 212-633-6555. Can a socially progressive &#8230; <a href="https://artcritical.com/2005/05/12/gallery-going-a-version-of-this-article-first-appeared-in-the-new-york-sun-may-2005/">Continued</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2005/05/12/gallery-going-a-version-of-this-article-first-appeared-in-the-new-york-sun-may-2005/">Elizabeth Huey at Feigen Contemporary, Hilary Harkness at Mary Boone, Thomas Trosch at Fredericks Freiser</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elizabeth Huey through May 28 at Feigen Contemporary, 535 W 20th Street, between 10th and 11th Avenues, 212-929-0500.</p>
<p>Hilary Harkness through June 25 at Mary Boone, 745 Fifth Avenue at 57th Street, 212-752-2929.</p>
<p>Thomas Trosch through June 10 at Fredericks Freiser, 504 W 22nd Street between 10th and 11th Avenues, 212-633-6555.</p>
<figure style="width: 432px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" title="Elizabeth Huey The Cyclothymic Forest  (detail: right panel)  2005   acrylic and oil on wood panel, 48 x 192 inches  Courtesy Feigen Contemporary" src="https://artcritical.com/DavidCohen/sun_images_may/huey.jpg" alt="Elizabeth Huey The Cyclothymic Forest  (detail: right panel)  2005   acrylic and oil on wood panel, 48 x 192 inches  Courtesy Feigen Contemporary" width="432" height="219" /><figcaption class="wp-caption-text">Elizabeth Huey, The Cyclothymic Forest  (detail: right panel)  2005   acrylic and oil on wood panel, 48 x 192 inches  Courtesy Feigen Contemporary</figcaption></figure>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Can a socially progressive male critic use the term “girlie” without getting lynched? Conscience and propriety would suggest not, yet an ascendant artworld aesthetic cries out for just this word.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Show after show, it seems, of emerging arists feature Barbie-like stick-figures, delicate, often saccherine colors, wilfully adolescent touch and a hyperbolic feyness that collides an inner child with a post-feminist sensibility. Whether the imagery is diaristic, narrative, or a postmodern jumble, the exemplar for the girlie generation, perversely enough, seems to be the wacky, tortured visionary Henry Darger: young women artists are as devoted to the Chicago janitor as he was to the Vivian Girls of his magnum opus.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Amy Wilson is an extreme example of this: “The Global Appeal of Liberty,” as her show is titled, closing this weekend at Bellwether, reveals an artistic personality split between psychological intensity and total drippiness, with a fusion of anal graphic handling and delicate watercolor, on the one hand, and long, bewildering bubble captions in a neat, fastidious script, on the other. The aesthetic is somewhere between medievalism and 5th grade.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">What Ms. Wilson has in common with three other current exhibitions that warrant closer attention is a charged collision of the obsessive and the ditsy: one of these shows is even by a man, just to prove there is nothing “essentialist” in the girlie aesthetic.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">At the front project room at Feigen Contemporary, Elizabeth Huey&#8217;s instense, involved symbolist narratives, often starring angels, little girls, and deer (a favored motif of the girlie generation, pace Maureen Cavanaugh and Jenny Scobel) are set in primal forests with intricately rendered Tudor mansions or oppressively bland institutional or utilitarian buildings as lurking presences.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">A recent Yale MFA graduate, Ms. Huey&#8217;s made a strong debut at Michael Steinberg last year. Combining folkoristic, religious, scientific and historical imagery, she pits naivité and sophistication against one another in terms, equally, of subject matter, artistic language, and attitude; the same dichotomy relate to her own interestingly split intentions.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Her show is dominated by a monumental diptych: “ The Cyclothymic Forest,” (2005). The figure of a young woman in a stylish, slightly retro dress repeats in mirror form at the joining edges, suggesting she is the “Girl, Interrupted” of the psychological disorder referenced in the title. But the two canvases fail to divide along bipolar lines, as degrees of elation and enervation permeate both halves. She is lost in her forest of signs: washed out gray sheep meander along pathways; men in green jackets empty likely toxic contents of a bucket down a manhole; a dominatrix with a blanked-out face struts around; illustration book twin girls with spindly legs, one dressed in Indian feathers and a bandit mask, look on. The figures seem pasted in, oblivious of one another, their costumes appropriated from different epochs and unrelated dramas, and yet this is far from being a flattened-out, arbitrary decorative schemes: the elements are held together by a strong narrative urge.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">In Ms. Huey&#8217;s handling, incongruity has neither the menace or humor of surrealism nor the cyncism of such image anarchists as David Salle or Sigmar Polke. What she offers instead, bravely, is an internalized bipolarity, with a handling and rendering that veers from masterful confidence to mousey feebleness, lyricism to quiet angst.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">***</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"> </span></p>
<figure style="width: 408px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><img loading="lazy" title="Hillary Harkness Dutch Treat  2005  graphite, oil, watercolor/paper, 11-1/4 x 10-3/4 inches " src="https://artcritical.com/DavidCohen/sun_images_may/harkness1.jpg" alt="Hillary Harkness Dutch Treat  2005  graphite, oil, watercolor/paper, 11-1/4 x 10-3/4 inches " width="408" height="432" /><figcaption class="wp-caption-text">Hillary Harkness, Dutch Treat  2005  graphite, oil, watercolor/paper, 11-1/4 x 10-3/4 inches </figcaption></figure>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">The narrative energy in Hilary Harkness is in a higher gear than in Ms. Huey: the focus of her sapphic, sado-masochistic orgy scenes, pillages and riots is unrelenting. Her skills are in harmony with her vision: where Ms. Huey paints with an awkward approximation of old master painterliness, Ms. Harkness has the hard, clean, nerdish exactitude of a cartoonist. She can be oldmasterly, too, but in her case it is the finesse of mannerist paintings on copper that come to mind: paint is transparent, surfaces sealed.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">But while a typical Harkness is crowded to bursting point with legions of near-identical figures—willowy, leggy stick figures running around torturing each other and exuding as much individuality and personality in the process as laboratory mice—they actually share with Ms. Huey&#8217;s angels and children a vacant sense of alienation. Her cloned cast is a herd of loners.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Less than a year ago Mary Boone presented her first show of this fascinatingly perverse artist: three relatively small panels were given a wall each of her Chelsea barn. Now, in a less precious display, an exhibition ostensibly devoted to drawings, which actually includes new panels and works in oil and watercolor on paper alongside line drawings, is offered at their uptown gallery. Morally speaking, it is business as usual: a massacre on a beach, a shoot out amidst back to the future modernist skyscrapers, a mass ablution in a luxurious ladies room.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">As ever, formally speaking, there is an amazing balance of detail and all-overness. “Heavy Cruisers” presents in cut-away cross section the bowels of a ship heavily populated by sailorettes equally busy with the naughty and the nautical. If the title is a suitably unsubtle pun, the handling of different mediums nonetheless reveal the extraordinary touch and control of this weird young woman. The firm delicacy of her line drawing, for instance, which have the legato exactitude of engravings, recall the neoclassical draughtsman John Flaxman. It makes one think: if Flaxman had honed his skills to Sade rather than Dante art history would have had its Harkness two centuries earlier.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">***</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"> </span></p>
<figure style="width: 432px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><img loading="lazy" title="Thomas Trosch Musical Comedy Medley #1 (detail) 1996   oil on canvas, 70 x 84 inches   Courtesy Fredericks Freiser" src="https://artcritical.com/DavidCohen/sun_images_may/trosch.jpg" alt="Thomas Trosch Musical Comedy Medley #1 (detail) 1996   oil on canvas, 70 x 84 inches   Courtesy Fredericks Freiser" width="432" height="287" /><figcaption class="wp-caption-text">Thomas Trosch, Musical Comedy Medley #1 (detail) 1996   oil on canvas, 70 x 84 inches   Courtesy Fredericks Freiser</figcaption></figure>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">“Pardon me if I seem lost in a world like a girl in a dream,” exclaims the bubble above the head of one of Thomas Trosch&#8217;s protagonists, a middle-aged lady presiding over a suburban salon. Mr. Trosch&#8217;s paintings are a risqué satire of modern art and bourgeois femininity. His absurdly camp style has often been compared with Florine Stettheimer in terms of whimsicality, naivité, and jolly palette, but where Stettheimer&#8217;s subject was her own high powered interaction with the pioneers of American modernism (Duchamp was a fixture in her salon) fused with a language, however fey, of personal intensity, Mr. Trosch offers a different edge in his collision of subject and style. He has almost recognizable Abstract Expressionist masters, or at least their spin-offs, blend with his rococo touch and girlie palette, sending up the supposed machismo of these heroic masters. But Mr. Trosch is demostrably more than a mere satirist: within the histrionics of his own tongue in cheek style he is concerned with the same formal issues as his mid-century artistic victims, for all that he tries to seem as blasé about them as his ladies-who-lunch fashion victims.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">A version of this article first appeared in the New York Sun, May 2005</span></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2005/05/12/gallery-going-a-version-of-this-article-first-appeared-in-the-new-york-sun-may-2005/">Elizabeth Huey at Feigen Contemporary, Hilary Harkness at Mary Boone, Thomas Trosch at Fredericks Freiser</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://artcritical.com/2005/05/12/gallery-going-a-version-of-this-article-first-appeared-in-the-new-york-sun-may-2005/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
