<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Valentine| De Wain &#8211; artcritical</title>
	<atom:link href="https://artcritical.com/tag/valentine-de-wain/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://artcritical.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 01:00:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.5.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>No Choice But To Trust The Senses: California Light and Space Revisited</title>
		<link>https://artcritical.com/2011/10/28/light-and-space-southern-california/</link>
					<comments>https://artcritical.com/2011/10/28/light-and-space-southern-california/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joan Boykoff Baron and Reuben M. Baron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 19:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Dispatches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Museum of Contemporary Art| San Diego]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pashgian| Helen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turrell| James]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valentine| De Wain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wheeler| Doug]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://artcritical.com/?p=19906</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>"Phenomenal" at  San Diego MoCA prompts rethink of West Coast minimalism</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2011/10/28/light-and-space-southern-california/">No Choice But To Trust The Senses: California Light and Space Revisited</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Report from… Southern California</p>
<figure id="attachment_19926" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-19926" style="width: 550px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/turrell.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-19926 " title="Doug Wheeler, DW 68 VEN MCASD 11, 1968/2011. White UV neon light installation, 18 x 34 x 33-3/4 feet. Courtesy of the artist" src="https://artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/turrell.jpg" alt="Doug Wheeler, DW 68 VEN MCASD 11, 1968/2011. White UV neon light installation, 18 x 34 x 33-3/4 feet. Courtesy of the artist" width="550" height="366" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2011/10/turrell.jpg 550w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2011/10/turrell-300x199.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 550px) 100vw, 550px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-19926" class="wp-caption-text">Doug Wheeler, DW 68 VEN MCASD 11, 1968/2011. White UV neon light installation, 18 x 34 x 33-3/4 feet. Courtesy of the artist</figcaption></figure>
<p>If ever there was a moment to reassess the 1960s Light and Space artists of Los Angeles, that moment is now.  At the Museum of Modern Art, New York, a recently reinstalled permanent gallery places three works from L.A. Light and Space art in critical dialogue with four works of New York Minimalism, which also had it defining years in the middle 1960s.  Simultaneously, a representative sampling of the Light and Space movement is presently on view at more than a dozen museums and gallery exhibits throughout Southern California participating in the Getty Foundation’s omnibus initiative <em>Pacific Standard Time:</em> <em>Art in L.A. 1945-1980</em>.  The pivotal survey, <em>Phenomenal California Light, Space, Surface</em> at the Museum of Contemporary Art San Diego through January 22, seen together with more focused shows at the other venues, listed at the end of this dispatch, allows us to grasp the fundamental characteristics of the Light and Space tradition that differentiates it from the Minimalism that was being practiced in New York by the likes of Donald Judd, Robert Morris, Frank Stella et al.</p>
<p>At a meta-level, the L.A. aesthetic may be characterized as “truth equals beauty” as distinguished from the “truth to materials” aesthetic prevailing in N.Y.  The N.Y. aesthetic embraced impermeable industrial materials and downplayed shadows and reflections in favor of the concreteness and stability of the specific object.  In contrast, L.A. artists, especially the Finish Fetish group, rejected concreteness and turned instead to newly available translucent and transparent materials—polyester resin, Plexiglas, fiberglass, coated glass, and plastics of all kinds.  These materials reflected, refracted, and filtered light, thus opening up new options for sculpture.  They were particularly well suited to capturing and transforming the ephemeral luminosity of the ocean and the smog-besmirched sky, as well as the high gloss brilliance of surfboards and autos that were primary everyday experiences for these artists.  In this context, the L.A. artists turned Stella’s reductive, “what you see is what you see” inside out by appending a question mark.<strong> </strong></p>
<p>Indeed, these L.A. works could be Michael Fried’s worst nightmare—their theatricality is an integral part of their aesthetic DNA.  They make us keenly aware that what you do affects what you see, and what you see affects what you do.  The properties of an effective resin piece don’t belong to the work alone.  Their color, shape, and surface effects are contingent on the spatial/temporal positions of observers as they move across, walk around, or enter the piece.  The spheres of Helen Pashgian and some of the boxes of Larry Bell change dramatically depending on the trajectory of the observer’s movements.  Certain works also depend upon the presence or absence of other people to bring out their complexity.  This occurs with Robert Irwin’s acrylic column and Bell’s five large coated glass panels, both installed strategically in busy and visually noisy locations on the Museum’s first floor.   These are socially contingent works that reach their potential when the movements of other people are reflected and refracted.</p>
<figure id="attachment_19924" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-19924" style="width: 225px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Valentine_Video_frame_01.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-19924 " title="De Wain Valentine, Diamond Column, 1978 (video still). Polyester resin, 91-1/ 2 x 44 x 12 inches. Collection Museum of Contemporary Art San Diego.© 1978 De Wain Valentine. Photo: Philipp Scholz Rittermann. " src="https://artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Valentine_Video_frame_01.jpg" alt="De Wain Valentine, Diamond Column, 1978 (video still). Polyester resin, 91-1/ 2 x 44 x 12 inches. Collection Museum of Contemporary Art San Diego.© 1978 De Wain Valentine. Photo: Philipp Scholz Rittermann. " width="225" height="350" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2011/10/Valentine_Video_frame_01.jpg 322w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2011/10/Valentine_Video_frame_01-193x300.jpg 193w" sizes="(max-width: 225px) 100vw, 225px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-19924" class="wp-caption-text">De Wain Valentine, Diamond Column, 1978 (video still). Polyester resin, 91-1/ 2 x 44 x 12 inches. Collection Museum of Contemporary Art San Diego.© 1978 De Wain Valentine. Photo: Philipp Scholz Rittermann. </figcaption></figure>
<p>Light and Space artists play the role of Shamans.   They have the uncanny ability to make the immaterial material and the material immaterial. They take liquid resin and make of it solid forms (Peter Alexander, Pashgian, and De Wain Valentine) or use light (James Turrell) or scrim (Irwin) to create the illusion of solid forms.  In doing so, strange things happen.  The observer is forced to confront objects and spaces that have hallucinatory properties not unlike the drooping watches in Dali’s <em>Persistence of Memory (1931)</em>.  These works challenge our assumptions about ordinary reality to a point where, using our perceptual, sensory-motor apparatus, we try to disambiguate forms as they appear to morph before our eyes.<strong> </strong>We<strong> </strong>feel compelled to walk up to and look behind a “floating” Irwin disc to see if it is attached to the wall or we stop short and gaze intently as soon as we detect an Irwin scrim that resizes a room by appearing to be a wall.  We feel compelled to check out whether the top portion of a tall Alexander Wedge is really still there when the bottom is deep orange and the color gradually fades to clear near the top;  to walk around Valentine’s <em>Diamond Column</em> to see how it is possible for people passing behind it to first appear, then disappear, and then return as three simultaneous images facing in different directions;  to walk up to Irwin’s dot painting and Pashgian’s white disc to explore how they are able to hover and pulsate;  to walk right up to the front of a Mary Corse painting with reflective glass microspheres after walking across it and seeing how it changes dramatically from matte to shiny and from totally uniform to containing grids or columns.  And we feel compelled to approach the wall works of Pashgian, Corse, Ron Cooper and Doug Wheeler, to see if there are lights embedded within them.  In all of these explorations, labeling is futile.  We have no choice but to trust our senses.</p>
<p>Several Light and Space artists are particularly good at making color diffuse into space.  Wheeler’s 35 foot-square room installation with one wall completely outlined in white neon UV lights suffuses the entire space in an ethereal<strong> </strong>atmosphere of blue air.  Other effects are achieved by introducing a temporal dimension to heighten color intensity.  Turrell’s installation (<em>Wedgework V</em>, 1975) requires several minutes of adjustment time in an initially pitch black space before a red wall begins to appear and then intensifies to a fiery glow.  Bruce Nauman’s narrow tunnel with two parallel walls one foot apart and forty feet long lit with green lights seduces us to inch slowly through it sideways.  When we exit this disorienting light tunnel into a wider space, everything appears purple for several seconds— the people, the walls, and the Pacific Ocean seen through an immense glass window.</p>
<p>The other museums and galleries showing Light and Space work (listed below) give us an appreciation of the career trajectories and new options being opened by several of the artists already mentioned (e.g., Alexander, Irwin, Pashgian, Valentine).  In particular, their new work, by utilizing the wall, reinvigorates a dialogue between painting and sculpture, begun earlier by John McCracken and Craig Kauffman.   These shows also introduce us to established but less well known artists like Tom Eatherton at Pomona College who has created an intensely blue space that creates the illusion that you are walking into the middle of a room-size painting.  And, thanks to storefront spaces like Ice Gallery, we can see emerging artists like Michael James Armstrong who is advancing the use of scrims in new and exciting directions.</p>
<p>After seeing these works in many different settings, we were left with three concluding observations.<strong> </strong>First, the Light and Space artists were determined to make us reexamine how we perceive the world—what is illusory and what is real.  Second, these artists shamelessly court beauty, an aesthetic questioned by postmodern art but openly embraced in the design aesthetic of Steve Jobs and in the reflective surfaces of Frank Gehry’s signature architecture—two iconic Californians who may be seen as heirs to the Light and Space culture.  Third, the relationship between Minimalism and the Light and Space tradition is a complex one, as can be seen, in the MOMA reinstallation, in the atmospheric effects of Dan Flavin’s light sculpture and the exquisite use of colored Plexiglas by Donald Judd. The fruitfulness of this exchange calls out for further study.  The next step?  We suggest a comprehensive exhibition combining Light and Space and East Coast Minimalism that would be seen on both coasts.  Such an exhibition would enable us to appreciate more fully the unique and shared strategies that animate those aspects of Minimalism that dare to flirt with beauty.</p>
<figure id="attachment_19927" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-19927" style="width: 300px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Pashgian_0293.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-medium wp-image-19927 " title="Helen Pashgian, Untitled, 1968-69, cast polyester resin. 8 inches diameter. Museum of Contemporary Art San Diego. Photo by Philipp Scholz Rittermann." src="https://artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Pashgian_0293-300x225.jpg" alt="Helen Pashgian, Untitled, 1968-69, cast polyester resin. 8 inches diameter. Museum of Contemporary Art San Diego. Photo by Philipp Scholz Rittermann." width="300" height="225" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-19927" class="wp-caption-text">Helen Pashgian, Untitled, 1968-69, cast polyester resin. 8 inches diameter. Museum of Contemporary Art San Diego. Photo by Philipp Scholz Rittermann.</figcaption></figure>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"> </span></p>
<p><strong>Los Angeles Light and Space Works on View in Southern California, Fall, 2011</strong></p>
<p><em>Phenomenal: California Light, Space, Surface</em> at Museum of Contemporary Art San Diego<br />
September 25, 2011 to January 22, 2012<br />
700 Prospect Street, La Jolla, CA and 1100 &amp; 1101 Kettner Boulevard, San Diego, CA, between Broadway and B Street. (858) 454-3541 (Catalogue available)</p>
<p>and</p>
<p><em>Pacific Standard Time: Crosscurrents</em> <em>in L.A. Painting and Sculpture, 1950-1970</em> at Getty Center, 1200 Getty Center Drive, L.A.  October 1, 2011 to February 5, 2012.  Light and Space art is a subset of the exhibition. (Catalogue)<em> </em></p>
<p><em>From Start to Finish: De Wain Valentine’s</em> <em>Grey Column </em>at Getty Center, 1200 Getty Center Drive, L.A.  September 13, 2011 to March 11, 2012. (Catalogue)</p>
<p><em>California Art: Selections from the Frederick R. Weisman Art Foundation </em>at<em> </em>Frederick R. Weisman Museum of Art, Pepperdine University, 24255 Pacific Coast Highway, Malibu<em>. </em>August 27 to December 2, 2011.  Light and Space art is a subset of the exhibition. (Catalogue)</p>
<p><em>It Happened at Pomona at the Edge of Los Angeles 1969—1973; Part I Hal Glicksman at Pomona,</em> Pomona College Museum of Art, 333 N. College Way, Claremont. August 30 to November 6, 2011.   (Catalogue)</p>
<p>James Turrell’s <em>Dividing the Light</em> (2007) at Draper Courtyard of the Lincoln &amp; Edmonds Buildings, corner of 6<sup>th</sup> Street and College Way, Pomona College, Claremont.  Permanent.</p>
<p><em>Mary Corse</em> <em>Recent Paintings </em>at Ace Gallery, 9430 Wilshire Boulevard, Beverly Hills. Through October, 2011.</p>
<p><em>Robert Irwin</em> <em>Column (1970) </em>at Ace Gallery, 9430 Wilshire Boulevard, Beverly Hills. Through October 18, 2011.</p>
<p><em>Helen Pashgian</em> <em>Columns and Walls </em>at Ace Gallery, 9430 Wilshire Boulevard, Beverly Hills. Through November, 2011.</p>
<p><em>De Wain Valentine</em> <em>Early Resins 1968-1972 and New Work at </em>Ace Gallery, 9430 Wilshire Boulevard, Beverly Hills. Through November, 2011.</p>
<p><em>James Turrell</em> <em>Present Tense </em>at<em> </em>Kayne, Griffen, Corcoran, 2902 Nebraska Ave., Santa Monica. September 15 to December 17, 2011.</p>
<p><em>Larry Bell Early Work</em> at Frank Lloyd Gallery, 2525 Michigan Avenue, B5B, Santa Monica. October 22 to November 26, 2011.</p>
<p><em>Fred Eversley: Four Decades—1970-2010 </em>at William Turner Gallery, 2525 Michigan Avenue, E1, Santa Monica.  September 24 to October 30, 2011.</p>
<p><em>Robert Irwin Way Out West</em> at L &amp; M Gallery, 660 Venice Boulevard, Venice. September 17 to October 22, 2011.</p>
<p><em>Peter Alexander, Mary Corse, Robert Irwin,</em> <em>New Out West</em> at Quint Gallery, 7547 Girard Ave., La Jolla. September 23 to November 12, 2011.</p>
<p><em>Larry Bell, Craig Kauffman, De Wain Valentine, Eric Johnson: Shift. Space. Slick</em> at Scott White Contemporary Art, 939 W. Kalmia, San Diego. September 9 to October 8, 2011.</p>
<p><em>Michael James Armstrong:</em> <em>A Study in Transparency</em> at Ice Gallery, 3417 30<sup>th</sup> Street, San Diego. September 18 to October 9, 2011.</p>
<figure id="attachment_19923" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-19923" style="width: 300px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Turrell_4087.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-medium wp-image-19923 " title="James Turrell, Wedgewood V, 1975, Fluorescent Light, dimensions variable. Courtesy of Abstract Select Ltd. UK" src="https://artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Turrell_4087-300x247.jpg" alt="James Turrell, Wedgewood V, 1975, Fluorescent Light, dimensions variable. Courtesy of Abstract Select Ltd. UK" width="300" height="247" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2011/10/Turrell_4087-300x247.jpg 300w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2011/10/Turrell_4087.jpg 550w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-19923" class="wp-caption-text">James Turrell, Wedgewood V, 1975, Fluorescent Light, dimensions variable. Courtesy of Abstract Select Ltd. UK</figcaption></figure>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2011/10/28/light-and-space-southern-california/">No Choice But To Trust The Senses: California Light and Space Revisited</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://artcritical.com/2011/10/28/light-and-space-southern-california/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Armory Show Modern (Pier 92): A photo journal</title>
		<link>https://artcritical.com/2010/03/08/the-armory-show-modern-pier-92-a-photo-journal/</link>
					<comments>https://artcritical.com/2010/03/08/the-armory-show-modern-pier-92-a-photo-journal/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Zinsser]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 19:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Out and About]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Armory Show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Botero| Fernando]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buren| Daniel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cao| Zou]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago| Judy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[de Kooning| Willem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Francis| Sam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knoedler & Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McLaughlin| John]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Murphy| Catherine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nozkowski| Thomas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Schnabel| Julian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Schultz| Michael]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senior & Shopmaker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snyder| Gary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spanierman Modern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valentine| De Wain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washburn| Joan and Brian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wei| Lilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Winter Works on Paper]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://testingartcritical.com/?p=179</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>“The second year looks good,” commented Washburn, the type of dealer who makes returning to The Armory Fair Modern a pleasure.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2010/03/08/the-armory-show-modern-pier-92-a-photo-journal/">The Armory Show Modern (Pier 92): A photo journal</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TANGLED UP IN BLUE</p>
<figure id="attachment_5713" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-5713" style="width: 500px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="http://testingartcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/1194.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-5713" title="Mother-and-son team Joan Washburn and Brian Washburn place themselves in painting’s expansive field.  " src="http://testingartcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/1194.jpg" alt="Mother-and-son team Joan Washburn and Brian Washburn place themselves in painting’s expansive field.  " width="500" height="375" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2010/03/1194.jpg 500w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2010/03/1194-275x205.jpg 275w" sizes="(max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-5713" class="wp-caption-text">Mother-and-son team Joan Washburn and Brian Washburn place themselves in painting’s expansive field.  </figcaption></figure>
<p>“The second year looks good,” commented Washburn, the type of dealer who makes returning to The Armory Fair Modern a pleasure. Her long-term dedication to a core group of New York School artists has paid off: she has material that no one else even has access to—rarities from estates and other connoisseur gems. Seen here: a 1960 Ray Parker and 1957 Nicolas Carone, with a 2006 Gwynn Murrill feline in the foreground.</p>
<p>SITTING PRETTY</p>
<figure id="attachment_5712" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-5712" style="width: 500px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="http://testingartcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/1195.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-5712" title="Fernando Botero bronze framed by a Sam Francis at Munich’s Galerie Thomas.  " src="http://testingartcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/1195.jpg" alt="Fernando Botero bronze framed by a Sam Francis at Munich’s Galerie Thomas.  " width="500" height="375" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2010/03/1195.jpg 500w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2010/03/1195-300x225.jpg 300w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2010/03/1195-275x205.jpg 275w" sizes="(max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-5712" class="wp-caption-text">Fernando Botero bronze framed by a Sam Francis at Munich’s Galerie Thomas.  </figcaption></figure>
<p>It just wouldn’t be an art fair proper, without Botero and Francis. And those two works provide a provenance for the future: the recent Damien Hirst spin painting directly beside.</p>
<p>THE HAVE KNOTS</p>
<figure id="attachment_5711" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-5711" style="width: 500px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="http://testingartcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/1196.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-5711" title="A sidelong glance from Knoedler’s Anastasia Ehrich says it all—everyone loves Catherine Murphy’s paintings.  " src="http://testingartcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/1196.jpg" alt="A sidelong glance from Knoedler’s Anastasia Ehrich says it all—everyone loves Catherine Murphy’s paintings.  " width="500" height="375" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2010/03/1196.jpg 500w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2010/03/1196-300x225.jpg 300w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2010/03/1196-275x205.jpg 275w" sizes="(max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-5711" class="wp-caption-text">A sidelong glance from Knoedler’s Anastasia Ehrich says it all—everyone loves Catherine Murphy’s paintings.  </figcaption></figure>
<p>A sidelong glance from Knoedler’s Anastasia Ehrich says it all—everyone loves Catherine Murphy’s paintings.</p>
<p>This solo show features the first works Murphy has ever made as a series. She became “obsessed with seeing repetitive things in her house,” I was told. In each, she depicts the ring stains that wood knots make through common house paint, leaving ghost-like circles. Murphy, a master of visual double entendre, locates these within larger plays of geometry and perception.</p>
<p>PAPERWORKS POWERHOUSE</p>
<figure id="attachment_5710" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-5710" style="width: 500px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="http://testingartcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/1198.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-5710" title="Chelsea newcomers Larry Shopmaker and Betsy Senior (with a Rauschenberg).  " src="http://testingartcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/1198.jpg" alt="Chelsea newcomers Larry Shopmaker and Betsy Senior (with a Rauschenberg).  " width="500" height="375" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2010/03/1198.jpg 500w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2010/03/1198-300x225.jpg 300w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2010/03/1198-275x205.jpg 275w" sizes="(max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-5710" class="wp-caption-text">Chelsea newcomers Larry Shopmaker and Betsy Senior (with a Rauschenberg).  </figcaption></figure>
<p>Reinvigorated by their recent move to 11th Avenue, and their launching of the new Senior &amp; Shopmaker space with a show of paper pieces by New York hometown hero, Thomas Nozkowski, these paired dealers are taking their act on the road in search of greater visibility.</p>
<p>PICTURES AT AN EXHIBITION</p>
<figure id="attachment_5709" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-5709" style="width: 500px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="http://testingartcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/1199.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-5709" title="A 1989 Daniel Buren: A Frame in a Frame in a Frame for a Frame, at Adler &amp; Conkright Fine A" src="http://testingartcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/1199.jpg" alt="A 1989 Daniel Buren: A Frame in a Frame in a Frame for a Frame, at Adler &amp; Conkright Fine A" width="500" height="375" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2010/03/1199.jpg 500w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2010/03/1199-300x225.jpg 300w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2010/03/1199-275x205.jpg 275w" sizes="(max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-5709" class="wp-caption-text">A 1989 Daniel Buren: A Frame in a Frame in a Frame for a Frame, at Adler &amp; Conkright Fine A</figcaption></figure>
<p>Suggesting fractured reality, this piece was originally made by the French stripe master for a show at the Hirshhorn Museum, according to the New York dealers offering it.</p>
<p>FISTS OF FURY</p>
<figure id="attachment_5708" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-5708" style="width: 500px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="http://testingartcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/1208.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-5708" title="Berlin’s Michael Schultz with Zou Cao’s, Chairman Mao, 2010.  " src="http://testingartcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/1208.jpg" alt="Berlin’s Michael Schultz with Zou Cao’s, Chairman Mao, 2010.  " width="500" height="375" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2010/03/1208.jpg 500w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2010/03/1208-300x225.jpg 300w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2010/03/1208-275x205.jpg 275w" sizes="(max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-5708" class="wp-caption-text">Berlin’s Michael Schultz with Zou Cao’s, Chairman Mao, 2010.  </figcaption></figure>
<p>Schultz is a globalist, with branch galleries in Seoul and Beijing and a pan-international neo-pop stable of artists. The work he stands before was sold at the outset of the fair for 130,000 euros, he told me. “Tonight, we eat good meat,” he crowed, with Teutonic glee, shaking his fists.</p>
<p>ECCENTRIC ABSTRACT</p>
<figure id="attachment_5707" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-5707" style="width: 500px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="http://testingartcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/1212.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-5707" title="Works by DeWain Valentine, 1971, John McLaughlin, 1960, and Judy Chicago, 1967, at David Klein Gallery, of Birmingham, Michigan.  " src="http://testingartcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/1212.jpg" alt="Works by DeWain Valentine, 1971, John McLaughlin, 1960, and Judy Chicago, 1967, at David Klein Gallery, of Birmingham, Michigan.  " width="500" height="375" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2010/03/1212.jpg 500w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2010/03/1212-300x225.jpg 300w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2010/03/1212-275x205.jpg 275w" sizes="(max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-5707" class="wp-caption-text">Works by DeWain Valentine, 1971, John McLaughlin, 1960, and Judy Chicago, 1967, at David Klein Gallery, of Birmingham, Michigan.  </figcaption></figure>
<p>One hardly expects to see such outré sophistication coming out of a gallery from the rural heartland. Here, geometry is played against personal idiosyncratic vision by three extremists of post-war non-objectivism.</p>
<p>HAIL TO THE CHEF</p>
<p><a href="http://testingartcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/1216.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-5706 alignnone" title="Art writer Lilly Wei strikes a supplicating pose in the presence of Julian Schnabel’s massive 2007 self-portrait at Galerie Forsblom, Helsinki." src="http://testingartcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/1216.jpg" alt="Art writer Lilly Wei strikes a supplicating pose in the presence of Julian Schnabel’s massive 2007 self-portrait at Galerie Forsblom, Helsinki." width="500" height="375" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2010/03/1216.jpg 500w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2010/03/1216-300x225.jpg 300w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2010/03/1216-275x205.jpg 275w" sizes="(max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px" /></a></p>
<p>Art writer Lilly Wei strikes a supplicating pose in the presence of Julian Schnabel’s massive 2007 self-portrait at Galerie Forsblom, Helsinki.</p>
<p>PHOTO BOOTH</p>
<figure id="attachment_5705" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-5705" style="width: 500px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="http://testingartcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/1222.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-5705" title="Williamsburg, Brooklyn dealer David Winter of Winter Works on Paper.  " src="http://testingartcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/1222.jpg" alt="Williamsburg, Brooklyn dealer David Winter of Winter Works on Paper.  " width="500" height="375" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2010/03/1222.jpg 500w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2010/03/1222-300x225.jpg 300w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2010/03/1222-275x205.jpg 275w" sizes="(max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-5705" class="wp-caption-text">Williamsburg, Brooklyn dealer David Winter of Winter Works on Paper.  </figcaption></figure>
<p>From 20th Century photography masters to odd ephemera from newspaper vaults and police mug shot files, here’s a trove of American Studies-worthy artifacts. “The hippest buyers are museums, like the Metropolitan and the Modern,” Winter told me. “They’re willing to buy something more edgy than collectors.” He expanded, “in painting and sculpture, you don’t have the museums leading.” The reason?  “Maybe it’s because they don’t have to re-sell the stuff,” he added, wryly.</p>
<p>MARRIAGE COUNCIL</p>
<figure id="attachment_5704" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-5704" style="width: 500px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="http://testingartcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/1229.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-5704" title="Works by Elaine de Kooning and William de Kooning at Mark Borghi Fine Art, of New York and Bridgehampton.  " src="http://testingartcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/1229.jpg" alt="Works by Elaine de Kooning and William de Kooning at Mark Borghi Fine Art, of New York and Bridgehampton.  " width="500" height="375" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2010/03/1229.jpg 500w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2010/03/1229-300x225.jpg 300w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2010/03/1229-275x205.jpg 275w" sizes="(max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-5704" class="wp-caption-text">Works by Elaine de Kooning and William de Kooning at Mark Borghi Fine Art, of New York and Bridgehampton.  </figcaption></figure>
<p>East End of Long Island veteran dealer Borghi mounted a series of Elaine de Kooning ink nudes, <em>Portrait of Bill—An Intimate View</em>, unflinching and direct. A show of comparative small works by the abstract expressionist couple rounded things out.</p>
<p>A DEALER’S SECRET</p>
<figure id="attachment_5703" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-5703" style="width: 500px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="http://testingartcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/1230.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-5703" title="Paintings by legendary dealer Betty Parsons (1900-1982) at Spanierman Modern.  " src="http://testingartcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/1230.jpg" alt="Paintings by legendary dealer Betty Parsons (1900-1982) at Spanierman Modern.  " width="500" height="375" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2010/03/1230.jpg 500w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2010/03/1230-300x225.jpg 300w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2010/03/1230-275x205.jpg 275w" sizes="(max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-5703" class="wp-caption-text">Paintings by legendary dealer Betty Parsons (1900-1982) at Spanierman Modern.  </figcaption></figure>
<p>Parsons helped launch Barnett Newman, Jackson Pollock, Clyfford Still, and Mark Rothko, among others. Her own contribution as an artist is overshadowed. In this rangy survey, viewers were left to connect the many dots: with evocations of Forrest Bess, Milton Avery and Robert Motherwell.</p>
<p>TONGUE AND GROOVE</p>
<figure id="attachment_5702" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-5702" style="width: 500px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="http://testingartcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/1233.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-5702" title="Dealer Gary Snyder flanked by works by Sven Lukin, 1965, and Nicholas Krushenick, 1962.  " src="http://testingartcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/1233.jpg" alt="Dealer Gary Snyder flanked by works by Sven Lukin, 1965, and Nicholas Krushenick, 1962.  " width="500" height="375" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2010/03/1233.jpg 500w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2010/03/1233-300x225.jpg 300w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2010/03/1233-275x205.jpg 275w" sizes="(max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-5702" class="wp-caption-text">Dealer Gary Snyder flanked by works by Sven Lukin, 1965, and Nicholas Krushenick, 1962.  </figcaption></figure>
<p>New York’s Gary Snyder/Project Space Gallery takes a curatorial approach, working the gap between pop and abstraction. Both artists pictured here were represented by Pace Gallery in the 1960s and then fell between the cracks. Maybe the time is right to take another look.</p>
<p>And that’s the art of art dealing at The Armory Show Modern—instinct and timing.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2010/03/08/the-armory-show-modern-pier-92-a-photo-journal/">The Armory Show Modern (Pier 92): A photo journal</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://artcritical.com/2010/03/08/the-armory-show-modern-pier-92-a-photo-journal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
