<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Chicago Imagists &#8211; artcritical</title>
	<atom:link href="https://artcritical.com/tag/chicago-imagists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://artcritical.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2014 00:10:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.5.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Beyond Image: William Conger of Chicago</title>
		<link>https://artcritical.com/2014/10/21/deven-golden-on-william-conger/</link>
					<comments>https://artcritical.com/2014/10/21/deven-golden-on-william-conger/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deven Golden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2014 22:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Exhibitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abstract painting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago Imagists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conger| William]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Golden| Deven]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Studio Vendome Projects]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.artcritical.com/?p=43949</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A veteran abstract painter defined by and defining his city. </p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2014/10/21/deven-golden-on-william-conger/">Beyond Image: William Conger of Chicago</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>William Conger at Studio Vendome Projects</p>
<p>September 18 &#8211; October 24 2014<br />
(exhibition closed earlier than scheduled)<br />
30 Grand Street (between Thompson Street and Sixth Avenue)<br />
New York City, 646 650 2466</p>
<figure id="attachment_43951" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-43951" style="width: 550px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/CongerInstall3.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-43951" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/CongerInstall3.jpg" alt="Installation shot of the exhibition under review with works by William Conger, both oil on canvas: left, Dervish, 2008, 54 x 60 inches, and Dutchman, 2011, 66 x 30 inches.  Courtesy of Studio Vendome Projects" width="550" height="462" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2014/10/CongerInstall3.jpg 550w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2014/10/CongerInstall3-275x231.jpg 275w" sizes="(max-width: 550px) 100vw, 550px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-43951" class="wp-caption-text">Installation shot of the exhibition under review with works by William Conger, both oil on canvas: left, Dervish, 2008, 54 x 60 inches, and Dutchman, 2011, 66 x 30 inches. Courtesy of Studio Vendome Projects</figcaption></figure>
<p>Before art magazines and the Internet flattened out the world and made us aware, perhaps overly so, of what artists everywhere were doing, artists developed their vision in dialogue with the place where they lived. As many know, Chicago had its own flavor of Pop Art in the 1960s and ‘70s: Imagism. Less well known are the many abstract artists there at the same time, engaged in loose but vital conversations with each other and other artists. Amongst them were Roland Ginzel, Thomas Kapsalis, Miyoko Ito, Richard Loving, and William Conger, whose recent works were recently on view in an exhibition organized by Saul Ostrow.</p>
<p>Simultaneously joyful and meditative, Conger’s paintings eschew anything that could be called outright representational. Yet consistently, insistently, they present a clearly identifiable space, albeit one defined by extremely flat perspective. The paint, oil for the larger works and gouache for the smaller ones, is applied with small careful strokes in thin blended colors, which then gently add up to large undulating planes of muted color. These large areas are, in turn, bounded and intersected by thick lines that are similarly, if less expansively, multicolored. The resulting images are oddly organic, strangely familiar, and resonate with undeniable emotional undertones. Perhaps it is simply human nature to try and ascribe recognizable objects to forms no matter how abstract, but Conger’s paintings elude the Rorschach test.</p>
<figure id="attachment_43953" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-43953" style="width: 275px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Conger-131.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="size-medium wp-image-43953" src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Conger-131-275x335.jpg" alt="William Conger, #131, 2014. Gouache on paper, 5 x 4 inches.  Courtesy of Studio Vendome Projects" width="275" height="335" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2014/10/Conger-131-275x335.jpg 275w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2014/10/Conger-131.jpg 410w" sizes="(max-width: 275px) 100vw, 275px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-43953" class="wp-caption-text">William Conger, #131, 2014. Gouache on paper, 5 x 4 inches. Courtesy of Studio Vendome Projects</figcaption></figure>
<p>Take, for instance, one of the larger paintings in the exhibition, the wonderful <em>Dutchman (</em>2011). Blue and violet geometric shapes make up a ground on which yellow, orange, red rounded forms (mostly) overlay. Gray-black lines, reminiscent of vine charcoal stick, weave in and out, behind and in front. The verticality of the canvas pushes a figurative reading — for a brief moment one might think Mickey Mouse on Owsley Acid — while the rounding of the forms and opalescent color leans decidedly more to thoughts of landscape. If this sounds confounding or unsettling, in person this dichotomy is much more likely to engender a sense of calm reflection. A tangential but related experience might be found viewing medieval stained-glass windows: shards of colored glass held together with lead present highly fragmented images that nonetheless imbue an overall feeling of wholeness.</p>
<p>Distant echoes and subtle influences clearly remain in Conger’s work from his early years in New Mexico looking at Raymond Jonson and other painters from the Transcendental Painting Group. Overall, however, Conger’s late works highlight the particular qualities of Chicago’s abstract style, favoring drawing and line over expressionistic brushwork resulting in there being more hand and less arm in the strokes. Imparting the impression of being a slower process, Chicago abstraction is less dependent on serendipity than its New York counterpart. There are exceptions, of course, and then one must also ask, if after 50 years as a major artist in Chicago, does Conger’s work look like the Chicago style, or does the Chicago style look like Conger’s work? A larger, more inclusive exhibition would be the way to find out.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2014/10/21/deven-golden-on-william-conger/">Beyond Image: William Conger of Chicago</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://artcritical.com/2014/10/21/deven-golden-on-william-conger/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gladys Nilsson / Julia Benjamin at National Exemplar</title>
		<link>https://artcritical.com/2013/10/04/julia-benjamin-and-gladys-nilsson/</link>
					<comments>https://artcritical.com/2013/10/04/julia-benjamin-and-gladys-nilsson/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nora Griffin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2013 18:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[a featured item from THE LIST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abstract painting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benjamin| Julia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago Imagists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Exemplar Gallery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nilsson| Gladys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nutt| Jim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surrealism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[watercolor]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.artcritical.com/?p=35074</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A fresh take on Surrealism in abstraction and figuration </p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2013/10/04/julia-benjamin-and-gladys-nilsson/">Gladys Nilsson / Julia Benjamin at National Exemplar</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<figure id="attachment_35084" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-35084" style="width: 560px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/jb.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class=" wp-image-35084 " title="Julia Benjamin, Untitled, 2013, oil on canvas, 42 x 52 inches. Courtesy of the artist and National Exemplar." src="https://www.artcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/jb-42x52.jpg" alt="Julia Benjamin, Untitled, 2013, oil on canvas, 42 x 52 inches. Courtesy of the artist and National Exemplar." width="560" height="457" srcset="https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2013/10/jb-42x52.jpg 700w, https://artcritical.com/app/uploads/2013/10/jb-42x52-275x224.jpg 275w" sizes="(max-width: 560px) 100vw, 560px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-35084" class="wp-caption-text">Julia Benjamin, Untitled, 2013, oil on canvas, 42 x 52 inches. Courtesy of the artist and National Exemplar.</figcaption></figure>
<p>Before you catch Magritte at the Museum of Modern Art this month, take a look at the contemporary version of Surrealist painting: Gladys Nilsson and Julia Benjamin. Gladys Nilsson (born 1940) has long been associated with a group of artists known as the Chicago Imagists, a moniker that belies the utter goofy-strangeness of her work, and that of her husband, Jim Nutt. Her watercolor and gouaches introduce a cast of characters from a pre-modern village, embedded within densely-realized landscapes of preening trees and tottering flowers. The gooey-lyrical abstract oil paintings of Julia Benjamin (born 1984) share Nilsson&#8217;s obsession with figures in space. In Benjamin&#8217;s case, strokes and dabs of color people the canvas and oddly mirror Nilsson&#8217;s skewered compositional style. Installed side-by-side, the paintings speak to each other as two-sides of the same story.</p>
<p>Gladys Nilsson / Julia Benjamin is on view until October 20, 2013 at the National Exemplar. The gallery is located at 381 Broadway at White Street, 2nd Floor, and is open Thursday to Sunday, 2 to 7 PM. Contact: thenationalexemplar@gmail.com</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com/2013/10/04/julia-benjamin-and-gladys-nilsson/">Gladys Nilsson / Julia Benjamin at National Exemplar</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://artcritical.com">artcritical</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://artcritical.com/2013/10/04/julia-benjamin-and-gladys-nilsson/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
